Managing clustering effects and learning effects in the design and analysis of multicentre randomised trials: a survey to establish current practice

Abstract Background Patient outcomes can depend on the treating centre, or health professional, delivering the intervention. A health professional’s skill in delivery improves with experience, meaning that outcomes may be associated with learning. Considering differences in intervention delivery at...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elizabeth J. Conroy, Jane M. Blazeby, Girvan Burnside, Jonathan A. Cook, Carrol Gamble
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-05-01
Series:Trials
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-020-04318-x
id doaj-d23a09064673439192a3ec177fa1c5df
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d23a09064673439192a3ec177fa1c5df2020-11-25T03:46:13ZengBMCTrials1745-62152020-05-0121111310.1186/s13063-020-04318-xManaging clustering effects and learning effects in the design and analysis of multicentre randomised trials: a survey to establish current practiceElizabeth J. Conroy0Jane M. Blazeby1Girvan Burnside2Jonathan A. Cook3Carrol Gamble4Department of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, a member of Liverpool Health PartnersCentre for Surgical Research, Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Population Health Sciences, University of BristolDepartment of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, a member of Liverpool Health PartnersCentre for Statistics in Medicine, University of OxfordDepartment of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, a member of Liverpool Health PartnersAbstract Background Patient outcomes can depend on the treating centre, or health professional, delivering the intervention. A health professional’s skill in delivery improves with experience, meaning that outcomes may be associated with learning. Considering differences in intervention delivery at trial design will ensure that any appropriate adjustments can be made during analysis. This work aimed to establish practice for the allowance of clustering and learning effects in the design and analysis of randomised multicentre trials. Methods A survey that drew upon quotes from existing guidelines, references to relevant publications and example trial scenarios was delivered. Registered UK Clinical Research Collaboration Registered Clinical Trials Units were invited to participate. Results Forty-four Units participated (N = 50). Clustering was managed through design by stratification, more commonly by centre than by treatment provider. Managing learning by design through defining a minimum expertise level for treatment provider was common (89%). One-third reported experience in expertise-based designs. The majority of Units had adjusted for clustering during analysis, although approaches varied. Analysis of learning was rarely performed for the main analysis (n = 1), although it was explored by other means. The insight behind the approaches used within and reasons for, or against, alternative approaches were provided. Conclusions Widespread awareness of challenges in designing and analysing multicentre trials is identified. Approaches used, and opinions on these, vary both across and within Units, indicating that approaches are dependent on the type of trial. Agreeing principles to guide trial design and analysis across a range of realistic clinical scenarios should be considered.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-020-04318-xTrials, Clinical Trials Unit, Clinical trial, Randomised controlled trial, Complex interventionSurgical interventionTrial designTrial analysisSurveyClustering
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Elizabeth J. Conroy
Jane M. Blazeby
Girvan Burnside
Jonathan A. Cook
Carrol Gamble
spellingShingle Elizabeth J. Conroy
Jane M. Blazeby
Girvan Burnside
Jonathan A. Cook
Carrol Gamble
Managing clustering effects and learning effects in the design and analysis of multicentre randomised trials: a survey to establish current practice
Trials
Trials, Clinical Trials Unit, Clinical trial, Randomised controlled trial, Complex intervention
Surgical intervention
Trial design
Trial analysis
Survey
Clustering
author_facet Elizabeth J. Conroy
Jane M. Blazeby
Girvan Burnside
Jonathan A. Cook
Carrol Gamble
author_sort Elizabeth J. Conroy
title Managing clustering effects and learning effects in the design and analysis of multicentre randomised trials: a survey to establish current practice
title_short Managing clustering effects and learning effects in the design and analysis of multicentre randomised trials: a survey to establish current practice
title_full Managing clustering effects and learning effects in the design and analysis of multicentre randomised trials: a survey to establish current practice
title_fullStr Managing clustering effects and learning effects in the design and analysis of multicentre randomised trials: a survey to establish current practice
title_full_unstemmed Managing clustering effects and learning effects in the design and analysis of multicentre randomised trials: a survey to establish current practice
title_sort managing clustering effects and learning effects in the design and analysis of multicentre randomised trials: a survey to establish current practice
publisher BMC
series Trials
issn 1745-6215
publishDate 2020-05-01
description Abstract Background Patient outcomes can depend on the treating centre, or health professional, delivering the intervention. A health professional’s skill in delivery improves with experience, meaning that outcomes may be associated with learning. Considering differences in intervention delivery at trial design will ensure that any appropriate adjustments can be made during analysis. This work aimed to establish practice for the allowance of clustering and learning effects in the design and analysis of randomised multicentre trials. Methods A survey that drew upon quotes from existing guidelines, references to relevant publications and example trial scenarios was delivered. Registered UK Clinical Research Collaboration Registered Clinical Trials Units were invited to participate. Results Forty-four Units participated (N = 50). Clustering was managed through design by stratification, more commonly by centre than by treatment provider. Managing learning by design through defining a minimum expertise level for treatment provider was common (89%). One-third reported experience in expertise-based designs. The majority of Units had adjusted for clustering during analysis, although approaches varied. Analysis of learning was rarely performed for the main analysis (n = 1), although it was explored by other means. The insight behind the approaches used within and reasons for, or against, alternative approaches were provided. Conclusions Widespread awareness of challenges in designing and analysing multicentre trials is identified. Approaches used, and opinions on these, vary both across and within Units, indicating that approaches are dependent on the type of trial. Agreeing principles to guide trial design and analysis across a range of realistic clinical scenarios should be considered.
topic Trials, Clinical Trials Unit, Clinical trial, Randomised controlled trial, Complex intervention
Surgical intervention
Trial design
Trial analysis
Survey
Clustering
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-020-04318-x
work_keys_str_mv AT elizabethjconroy managingclusteringeffectsandlearningeffectsinthedesignandanalysisofmulticentrerandomisedtrialsasurveytoestablishcurrentpractice
AT janemblazeby managingclusteringeffectsandlearningeffectsinthedesignandanalysisofmulticentrerandomisedtrialsasurveytoestablishcurrentpractice
AT girvanburnside managingclusteringeffectsandlearningeffectsinthedesignandanalysisofmulticentrerandomisedtrialsasurveytoestablishcurrentpractice
AT jonathanacook managingclusteringeffectsandlearningeffectsinthedesignandanalysisofmulticentrerandomisedtrialsasurveytoestablishcurrentpractice
AT carrolgamble managingclusteringeffectsandlearningeffectsinthedesignandanalysisofmulticentrerandomisedtrialsasurveytoestablishcurrentpractice
_version_ 1724507078075088896