Patient priorities in relation to surgery for gastric cancer: qualitative interviews with gastric cancer surgery patients to inform the development of a core outcome set

by Jane M Blazeby, Bilal Alkhaffaf, Rebecca L Morris
Published 2020-02-01

Integrating expert opinions with clinical trial data to analyse low-powered subgroup analyses: a Bayesian analysis of the VeRDiCT trial

by Russell Thirard, Raimondo Ascione, Jane M. Blazeby, Chris A. Rogers
Published 2020-12-01

A mixed methods case study investigating how randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are reported, understood and interpreted in practice

by Ben E. Byrne, Leila Rooshenas, Helen S. Lambert, Jane M. Blazeby
Published 2020-05-01

Managing clustering effects and learning effects in the design and analysis of multicentre randomised trials: a survey to establish current practice

by Elizabeth J. Conroy, Jane M. Blazeby, Girvan Burnside, Jonathan A. Cook, Carrol Gamble
Published 2020-05-01

Standardising the reporting of outcomes in gastric cancer surgery trials: protocol for the development of a core outcome set and accompanying outcome measurement instrument set (th...

by Bilal Alkhaffaf, Anne-Marie Glenny, Jane M. Blazeby, Paula Williamson, Iain A. Bruce
Published 2017-08-01

Patients’ experiences of life after bariatric surgery and follow-up care: a qualitative study

by Amanda Owen-Smith, Jane M Blazeby, Jenny L Donovan, Karen D Coulman, Fiona MacKichan
Published 2020-02-01

'Trial Exegesis': Methods for Synthesizing Clinical and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Data in Trials to Inform Clinical Practice. A Systematic Review.

by Angus G K McNair, Rhiannon C Macefield, Natalie S Blencowe, Sara T Brookes, Jane M Blazeby
Published 2016-01-01

The EQ-5D-5L is a valid approach to measure health related quality of life in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.

by Jilles M Fermont, Jane M Blazeby, Chris A Rogers, Sarah Wordsworth, By-Band-Sleeve Study Management Group
Published 2017-01-01

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey.

by Sarah L Gorst, Elizabeth Gargon, Mike Clarke, Jane M Blazeby, Douglas G Altman, Paula R Williamson
Published 2016-01-01

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review.

by Elizabeth Gargon, Binu Gurung, Nancy Medley, Doug G Altman, Jane M Blazeby, Mike Clarke, Paula R Williamson
Published 2014-01-01

Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations.

by Jamie J Kirkham, Katherine Davis, Douglas G Altman, Jane M Blazeby, Mike Clarke, Sean Tunis, Paula R Williamson
Published 2017-11-01

Impact of question order on prioritisation of outcomes in the development of a core outcome set: a randomised controlled trial

by Sara T. Brookes, Katy A. Chalmers, Kerry N. L. Avery, Karen Coulman, Jane M. Blazeby, on behalf of the ROMIO study group
Published 2018-01-01

Identifying research priorities for effective retention strategies in clinical trials

by Anna Kearney, Anne Daykin, Alison R. G. Shaw, Athene J. Lane, Jane M. Blazeby, Mike Clarke, Paula Williamson, Carrol Gamble
Published 2017-08-01

Methods for assessment of patient adherence to removable orthoses used after surgery or trauma to the appendicular skeleton: a systematic review

by Gareth Davies, Daniel Yeomans, Zoe Tolkien, Irene A. Kreis, Shelley Potter, Matthew D. Gardiner, Abhilash Jain, James Henderson, Jane M. Blazeby
Published 2020-06-01

Core information sets for informed consent to surgical interventions: baseline information of importance to patients and clinicians

by Barry G. Main, Angus G. K. McNair, Richard Huxtable, Jenny L. Donovan, Steven J. Thomas, Paul Kinnersley, Jane M. Blazeby
Published 2017-04-01

Core Outcome Set-STAndardised Protocol Items: the COS-STAP Statement

by Jamie J. Kirkham, Sarah Gorst, Douglas G. Altman, Jane M. Blazeby, Mike Clarke, Sean Tunis, Paula R. Williamson, for the COS-STAP Group
Published 2019-02-01

COSUMO: study protocol for the development of a core outcome set for efficacy and effectiveness trials in posterior segment-involving uveitis

by Mohammad O. Tallouzi, Jonathan M. Mathers, David J. Moore, Philip I. Murray, Nicholas Bucknall, Jane M. Blazeby, Melanie Calvert, Alastair K. Denniston
Published 2017-12-01

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: An updated systematic review and involvement of low and middle income countries.

by Katherine Davis, Sarah L Gorst, Nicola Harman, Valerie Smith, Elizabeth Gargon, Douglas G Altman, Jane M Blazeby, Mike Clarke, Sean Tunis, Paula R Williamson
Published 2018-01-01

What empirical research has been undertaken on the ethics of clinical research in India? A systematic scoping review and narrative synthesis

by Leila Rooshenas, Jane M Blazeby, Richard Huxtable, Julia Wade, Sangeetha Paramasivan, Jonathan Ives, Jenny L Donovan, Nicola Mills, Alison Richards, Alba Realpe, Supriya Subramani
Published 2021-05-01

‘Overnight, things changed. Suddenly, we were in it’: a qualitative study exploring how surgical teams mitigated risks of COVID-19

by Leila Rooshenas, Jane M Blazeby, Anni Skilton, Peter Hutchinson, Sian Cousins, Daisy Elliott, Sangeetha Paramasivan, Jenny L Donovan, Cynthia Ochieng, Martin Birchall, Kerry NL Avery
Published 2021-06-01