Flipped versus Traditional Classroom Information Literacy Sessions: Student Perceptions and Cognitions

Teaching effectively with limited classroom time is a challenge for information literacy teachers. In the flipped classroom (FC) teaching model, information transmission teaching is delivered outside of class, freeing up class time for learning activities. I adopted the FC model in sessions that we...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Torstein Låg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Bergen 2016-12-01
Series:Nordic Journal of Information Literacy in Higher Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://noril.uib.no/article/view/2494
id doaj-7089adc1a57c41baac47c0fa263bc33c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7089adc1a57c41baac47c0fa263bc33c2020-11-25T00:31:18ZengUniversity of BergenNordic Journal of Information Literacy in Higher Education1890-59002016-12-018110.15845/noril.v8i1.260191Flipped versus Traditional Classroom Information Literacy Sessions: Student Perceptions and CognitionsTorstein Låg0UiT The Arctic University of Norway Teaching effectively with limited classroom time is a challenge for information literacy teachers. In the flipped classroom (FC) teaching model, information transmission teaching is delivered outside of class, freeing up class time for learning activities. I adopted the FC model in sessions that were previously taught using a traditional classroom (TC) model. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the FC model's relative impact on (1) student perceptions of usefulness and quality, and (2) student cognitions about the IL sessions. Responses to evaluation forms from the TC model (N = 65), were compared to those from FC model (N = 78). Students judged usefulness and quality on two 4-point rating scales. Student cognitions were elicited with an open-ended question asking for suggestions for improvement and other comments. Responses to the latter were coded by an assistant blind to the conditions. Ratings were near ceiling and similar for both conditions. Responses to the open-ended question revealed interesting trends. Students in the FC condition provided wordier comments, were more concerned with what they themselves did and could do, and with the subject matter of the session. Students in the TC condition were more concerned with how information was presented to them. Results indicate that the FC teaching model is a viable alternative for IL sessions, and that it may encourage students to engage more with IL and their own learning process. https://noril.uib.no/article/view/2494information literacyteachingflipped classroomactive learning
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Torstein Låg
spellingShingle Torstein Låg
Flipped versus Traditional Classroom Information Literacy Sessions: Student Perceptions and Cognitions
Nordic Journal of Information Literacy in Higher Education
information literacy
teaching
flipped classroom
active learning
author_facet Torstein Låg
author_sort Torstein Låg
title Flipped versus Traditional Classroom Information Literacy Sessions: Student Perceptions and Cognitions
title_short Flipped versus Traditional Classroom Information Literacy Sessions: Student Perceptions and Cognitions
title_full Flipped versus Traditional Classroom Information Literacy Sessions: Student Perceptions and Cognitions
title_fullStr Flipped versus Traditional Classroom Information Literacy Sessions: Student Perceptions and Cognitions
title_full_unstemmed Flipped versus Traditional Classroom Information Literacy Sessions: Student Perceptions and Cognitions
title_sort flipped versus traditional classroom information literacy sessions: student perceptions and cognitions
publisher University of Bergen
series Nordic Journal of Information Literacy in Higher Education
issn 1890-5900
publishDate 2016-12-01
description Teaching effectively with limited classroom time is a challenge for information literacy teachers. In the flipped classroom (FC) teaching model, information transmission teaching is delivered outside of class, freeing up class time for learning activities. I adopted the FC model in sessions that were previously taught using a traditional classroom (TC) model. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the FC model's relative impact on (1) student perceptions of usefulness and quality, and (2) student cognitions about the IL sessions. Responses to evaluation forms from the TC model (N = 65), were compared to those from FC model (N = 78). Students judged usefulness and quality on two 4-point rating scales. Student cognitions were elicited with an open-ended question asking for suggestions for improvement and other comments. Responses to the latter were coded by an assistant blind to the conditions. Ratings were near ceiling and similar for both conditions. Responses to the open-ended question revealed interesting trends. Students in the FC condition provided wordier comments, were more concerned with what they themselves did and could do, and with the subject matter of the session. Students in the TC condition were more concerned with how information was presented to them. Results indicate that the FC teaching model is a viable alternative for IL sessions, and that it may encourage students to engage more with IL and their own learning process.
topic information literacy
teaching
flipped classroom
active learning
url https://noril.uib.no/article/view/2494
work_keys_str_mv AT torsteinlag flippedversustraditionalclassroominformationliteracysessionsstudentperceptionsandcognitions
_version_ 1725322738514526208