Investigating the prevalence and predictors of food insecurity: a comparison of HFSSM and EU-SILC indicators

Purpose: Data from the Northern Ireland (NI) Health Survey 2014/15 (n = 2,231) were statistically analysed to examine the prevalence of food insecurity according to both indicators. Pearson's X2 test for association and logistic regressions were used to examine associations between food securit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Beacom, E. (Author), Furey, S. (Author), Hollywood, L.E (Author), Humphreys, P. (Author), McLaughlin, C. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Emerald Group Holdings Ltd. 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 03024nam a2200445Ia 4500
001 10.1108-BFJ-05-2021-0514
008 220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 0007070X (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Investigating the prevalence and predictors of food insecurity: a comparison of HFSSM and EU-SILC indicators 
260 0 |b Emerald Group Holdings Ltd.  |c 2021 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-05-2021-0514 
520 3 |a Purpose: Data from the Northern Ireland (NI) Health Survey 2014/15 (n = 2,231) were statistically analysed to examine the prevalence of food insecurity according to both indicators. Pearson's X2 test for association and logistic regressions were used to examine associations between food security status and predictor variables. Design/methodology/approach: Household food insecurity has been identified as a significant societal issue in both developed and developing nations, but there exists no universal indicator to approximate its prevalence. In NI, two indicators (United States Household Food Security Survey Module [HFSSM] and the European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions [EU-SILC] food deprivation questions) have been used. This study examines how both indicators differ in their classification of food insecurity prevalence in a population sample and also examines the relationship between various demographic and household factors and food security status. Findings: According to the EU-SILC food deprivation questions, 8.3% (n = 185) were indicated to be food insecure, while according to the HFSSM, 6.5% (n = 146) were indicated to be food insecure. The HFSSM and EU-SILC regression models differed in the underlying variables they identified as significant predictors of food insecurity. Significant variables common to both modules were tenure, employment status, health status, anxiety/depression and receipt of benefits. Originality/value: Findings can inform policy action with regards to targeting the key contributors and can inform policy decisions in NI and elsewhere with regards to choosing the most appropriate food insecurity indicator. © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited. 
650 0 4 |a anxiety 
650 0 4 |a article 
650 0 4 |a demography 
650 0 4 |a Deprivation 
650 0 4 |a employment status 
650 0 4 |a European Union 
650 0 4 |a food deprivation 
650 0 4 |a food insecurity 
650 0 4 |a Food insecurity 
650 0 4 |a Food poverty 
650 0 4 |a food security 
650 0 4 |a health status 
650 0 4 |a household 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a Logistic regression 
650 0 4 |a major clinical study 
650 0 4 |a Measurement 
650 0 4 |a Northern Ireland 
650 0 4 |a poverty 
650 0 4 |a predictor variable 
650 0 4 |a prevalence 
650 0 4 |a United States 
700 1 |a Beacom, E.  |e author 
700 1 |a Furey, S.  |e author 
700 1 |a Hollywood, L.E.  |e author 
700 1 |a Humphreys, P.  |e author 
700 1 |a McLaughlin, C.  |e author 
773 |t British Food Journal