Close, far, wherever they are: how young children code relative proximity to a landmark
This investigation examined whether children can code the relative proximity of two objects to a landmark and whether they use verbal or nonverbal strategies to remember a target location. Two- to 2.5-year-olds completed a memory task where they watched an experimenter hide two different toys in two...
Main Author: | Lorenz, Megan Galligan |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Plumert, Jodie M. |
Format: | Others |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Iowa
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ir.uiowa.edu/etd/6987 https://ir.uiowa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8488&context=etd |
Similar Items
-
Russian Prepositions with the Meaning of Proximity and Ways of Their Expression in the Persian Language
by: S. M. Aliyari, et al.
Published: (2017-08-01) -
Spatial Continuity Effect vs. Spatial Contiguity Failure. Revising the Effects of Spatial Proximity Between Related and Unrelated Representations
by: Maik Beege, et al.
Published: (2019-08-01) -
Corrigendum: Spatial Continuity Effect vs. Spatial Contiguity Failure. Revising the Effects of Spatial Proximity Between Related and Unrelated Representations
by: Maik Beege, et al.
Published: (2020-04-01) -
Asymmetric coding of categorical spatial relations in both language and vision.
by: Jessica eRoth, et al.
Published: (2012-11-01) -
The expression of proximity in French and in English
by: Claude Vandeloise
Published: (2017-11-01)