Product symbolic status: development of a scale to assess different product types

The literature on status, product symbolism, product involvement, and reference group influence is reviewed to conceptually define the Product Symbolic Status construct. The research consisted of two studies (N = 524) that examined 17 different product types to develop and validate the Product Symbo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wright, James Arthur
Other Authors: Samuelson, Charles D.
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: Texas A&M University 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/4222
id ndltd-tamu.edu-oai-repository.tamu.edu-1969.1-4222
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-tamu.edu-oai-repository.tamu.edu-1969.1-42222013-01-08T10:38:23ZProduct symbolic status: development of a scale to assess different product typesWright, James ArthurProduct SymbolismSymbolic StatusInvolvementReference GroupValue-expressiveScale DevelopmentConsumer PerceptionsConspicuous ConsumptionThe literature on status, product symbolism, product involvement, and reference group influence is reviewed to conceptually define the Product Symbolic Status construct. The research consisted of two studies (N = 524) that examined 17 different product types to develop and validate the Product Symbolic Status (PSS) scale. The PSS scale is comprised of four facets: self-concept, impression management, lifestyle, and social visibility. The PSS scale consists of nine items which produced an average reliability of α = .90 and showed evidence of convergent and discriminant validity in MTMM analyses with the constructs of product value-expressiveness, product involvement, and product exclusivity/luxury. The PSS scale can also be used for brand symbolic status research. The marketing and advertising research implications are discussed.Texas A&M UniversitySamuelson, Charles D.2006-10-30T23:25:37Z2006-10-30T23:25:37Z2005-082006-10-30T23:25:37ZBookThesisElectronic Dissertationtext242848 byteselectronicapplication/pdfborn digitalhttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/4222en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Product Symbolism
Symbolic Status
Involvement
Reference Group
Value-expressive
Scale Development
Consumer Perceptions
Conspicuous Consumption
spellingShingle Product Symbolism
Symbolic Status
Involvement
Reference Group
Value-expressive
Scale Development
Consumer Perceptions
Conspicuous Consumption
Wright, James Arthur
Product symbolic status: development of a scale to assess different product types
description The literature on status, product symbolism, product involvement, and reference group influence is reviewed to conceptually define the Product Symbolic Status construct. The research consisted of two studies (N = 524) that examined 17 different product types to develop and validate the Product Symbolic Status (PSS) scale. The PSS scale is comprised of four facets: self-concept, impression management, lifestyle, and social visibility. The PSS scale consists of nine items which produced an average reliability of α = .90 and showed evidence of convergent and discriminant validity in MTMM analyses with the constructs of product value-expressiveness, product involvement, and product exclusivity/luxury. The PSS scale can also be used for brand symbolic status research. The marketing and advertising research implications are discussed.
author2 Samuelson, Charles D.
author_facet Samuelson, Charles D.
Wright, James Arthur
author Wright, James Arthur
author_sort Wright, James Arthur
title Product symbolic status: development of a scale to assess different product types
title_short Product symbolic status: development of a scale to assess different product types
title_full Product symbolic status: development of a scale to assess different product types
title_fullStr Product symbolic status: development of a scale to assess different product types
title_full_unstemmed Product symbolic status: development of a scale to assess different product types
title_sort product symbolic status: development of a scale to assess different product types
publisher Texas A&M University
publishDate 2006
url http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/4222
work_keys_str_mv AT wrightjamesarthur productsymbolicstatusdevelopmentofascaletoassessdifferentproducttypes
_version_ 1716503441916821504