The understanding and practice of inclusive education in a Jewish community school in South Africa

This qualitative study, pursued within a one–site case study, explores the understanding and implementation of inclusive education in an independent Jewish community school in Johannesburg, South Africa nineteen years post democracy. It analyses the phenomenon of inclusion in a school with a communi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Meltz, Adrienne
Other Authors: Herman, Chaya
Language:Eng
Published: University of Pretoria 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2263/32467
Meltz, A. 2013, The understanding and practice of inclusive education in a Jewish community school in South Africa, PhD thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/32467>
id ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-up-oai-repository.up.ac.za-2263-32467
record_format oai_dc
collection NDLTD
language Eng
sources NDLTD
topic South Africa
Jewish community school
Inclusive education
Lewin’s Theory
Special needs
Disability
Beliefs
Faith–based
Conditional inclusion
Qualitative research
Insider interviews
Document analysis
Case study
Interpretative/constructivist
UCTD
spellingShingle South Africa
Jewish community school
Inclusive education
Lewin’s Theory
Special needs
Disability
Beliefs
Faith–based
Conditional inclusion
Qualitative research
Insider interviews
Document analysis
Case study
Interpretative/constructivist
UCTD
Meltz, Adrienne
The understanding and practice of inclusive education in a Jewish community school in South Africa
description This qualitative study, pursued within a one–site case study, explores the understanding and implementation of inclusive education in an independent Jewish community school in Johannesburg, South Africa nineteen years post democracy. It analyses the phenomenon of inclusion in a school with a community ethos of care and belonging whose context is by definition exclusionary on grounds of a particular social category, religion. Because of its exclusionary agenda the school can be paradoxically positioned as inclusive on grounds of strong communal values. The school however, struggles with difference and diversity of a certain kind, despite its purportedly strong communal spirit and strong religious culture. This study set out to probe how stakeholders understood inclusive education in an attempt to explain how this influenced their practice of inclusive education. Lewin’s theory of Planned Change and four belief systems were utilized to examine the understanding and practice of stakeholders at the school. The study suggested that the four belief systems influenced the way in which inclusive education was both understood and practised in this school. The study argued for the recognition of the importance of different belief systems in the implementation of inclusion in South Africa. The main research question which guided the study was: How has inclusive education policy been implemented in a mono-cultural community school in South Africa, with the three sub–questions being: 1. How do the various school stakeholders understand the concept of inclusion and what are their attitudes towards inclusion? 2. How is inclusive education managed at class, school and community level? 3. To what extent do their attitudes and understandings influence their practice of inclusive education? It was conducted within an interpretative/constructivist research paradigm and utilized a case study design. It relied on qualitative methods of data generation such as insider interviews, personal accounts and document analysis. The participants were drawn from four stakeholder groups, namely, teachers, parents, middle managers and top managers. The descriptions of the stakeholders’ understandings that emerged in this study highlighted how belief systems determined the action towards inclusive education and how despite the school being a community school, the community discourse did not prevail in the actions towards inclusive education, it was the individual beliefs which vied for dominance which determined inclusive action. This resulted in a qualified and fragmented inclusion and in some cases exclusion. The findings were linked to Lewin’s planned approach to change including field theoretical and group dynamic theories. The study concluded that the four belief systems influenced the way in which inclusive education was both understood and practised in this school and the study argued for the recognition of the importance of different belief systems in the implementation of inclusion in South Africa. === Thesis (PhD)--University of Pretoria, 2013. === am2013 === Education Management and Policy Studies === unrestricted
author2 Herman, Chaya
author_facet Herman, Chaya
Meltz, Adrienne
author Meltz, Adrienne
author_sort Meltz, Adrienne
title The understanding and practice of inclusive education in a Jewish community school in South Africa
title_short The understanding and practice of inclusive education in a Jewish community school in South Africa
title_full The understanding and practice of inclusive education in a Jewish community school in South Africa
title_fullStr The understanding and practice of inclusive education in a Jewish community school in South Africa
title_full_unstemmed The understanding and practice of inclusive education in a Jewish community school in South Africa
title_sort understanding and practice of inclusive education in a jewish community school in south africa
publisher University of Pretoria
publishDate 2013
url http://hdl.handle.net/2263/32467
Meltz, A. 2013, The understanding and practice of inclusive education in a Jewish community school in South Africa, PhD thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/32467>
work_keys_str_mv AT meltzadrienne theunderstandingandpracticeofinclusiveeducationinajewishcommunityschoolinsouthafrica
AT meltzadrienne understandingandpracticeofinclusiveeducationinajewishcommunityschoolinsouthafrica
_version_ 1719358515834781696
spelling ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-up-oai-repository.up.ac.za-2263-324672020-11-21T05:20:19Z The understanding and practice of inclusive education in a Jewish community school in South Africa Meltz, Adrienne Herman, Chaya adrienne.meltz@gmail.com Pillay, Venitha South Africa Jewish community school Inclusive education Lewin’s Theory Special needs Disability Beliefs Faith–based Conditional inclusion Qualitative research Insider interviews Document analysis Case study Interpretative/constructivist UCTD This qualitative study, pursued within a one–site case study, explores the understanding and implementation of inclusive education in an independent Jewish community school in Johannesburg, South Africa nineteen years post democracy. It analyses the phenomenon of inclusion in a school with a community ethos of care and belonging whose context is by definition exclusionary on grounds of a particular social category, religion. Because of its exclusionary agenda the school can be paradoxically positioned as inclusive on grounds of strong communal values. The school however, struggles with difference and diversity of a certain kind, despite its purportedly strong communal spirit and strong religious culture. This study set out to probe how stakeholders understood inclusive education in an attempt to explain how this influenced their practice of inclusive education. Lewin’s theory of Planned Change and four belief systems were utilized to examine the understanding and practice of stakeholders at the school. The study suggested that the four belief systems influenced the way in which inclusive education was both understood and practised in this school. The study argued for the recognition of the importance of different belief systems in the implementation of inclusion in South Africa. The main research question which guided the study was: How has inclusive education policy been implemented in a mono-cultural community school in South Africa, with the three sub–questions being: 1. How do the various school stakeholders understand the concept of inclusion and what are their attitudes towards inclusion? 2. How is inclusive education managed at class, school and community level? 3. To what extent do their attitudes and understandings influence their practice of inclusive education? It was conducted within an interpretative/constructivist research paradigm and utilized a case study design. It relied on qualitative methods of data generation such as insider interviews, personal accounts and document analysis. The participants were drawn from four stakeholder groups, namely, teachers, parents, middle managers and top managers. The descriptions of the stakeholders’ understandings that emerged in this study highlighted how belief systems determined the action towards inclusive education and how despite the school being a community school, the community discourse did not prevail in the actions towards inclusive education, it was the individual beliefs which vied for dominance which determined inclusive action. This resulted in a qualified and fragmented inclusion and in some cases exclusion. The findings were linked to Lewin’s planned approach to change including field theoretical and group dynamic theories. The study concluded that the four belief systems influenced the way in which inclusive education was both understood and practised in this school and the study argued for the recognition of the importance of different belief systems in the implementation of inclusion in South Africa. Thesis (PhD)--University of Pretoria, 2013. am2013 Education Management and Policy Studies unrestricted 2013-11-19T09:13:39Z 2013-11-19T09:13:39Z 2013-09-04 2013 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/2263/32467 Meltz, A. 2013, The understanding and practice of inclusive education in a Jewish community school in South Africa, PhD thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/32467> D13/9/843 Eng © 2013 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria University of Pretoria