The understanding and practice of inclusive education in a Jewish community school in South Africa
This qualitative study, pursued within a one–site case study, explores the understanding and implementation of inclusive education in an independent Jewish community school in Johannesburg, South Africa nineteen years post democracy. It analyses the phenomenon of inclusion in a school with a communi...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Language: | Eng |
Published: |
University of Pretoria
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/32467 Meltz, A. 2013, The understanding and practice of inclusive education in a Jewish community school in South Africa, PhD thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/32467> |
id |
ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-up-oai-repository.up.ac.za-2263-32467 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
Eng |
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
South Africa Jewish community school Inclusive education Lewin’s Theory Special needs Disability Beliefs Faith–based Conditional inclusion Qualitative research Insider interviews Document analysis Case study Interpretative/constructivist UCTD |
spellingShingle |
South Africa Jewish community school Inclusive education Lewin’s Theory Special needs Disability Beliefs Faith–based Conditional inclusion Qualitative research Insider interviews Document analysis Case study Interpretative/constructivist UCTD Meltz, Adrienne The understanding and practice of inclusive education in a Jewish community school in South Africa |
description |
This qualitative study, pursued within a one–site case study, explores the understanding and implementation of inclusive education in an independent Jewish community school in Johannesburg, South Africa nineteen years post democracy. It analyses the phenomenon of inclusion in a school with a community ethos of care and belonging whose context is by definition exclusionary on grounds of a particular social category, religion. Because of its exclusionary agenda the school can be paradoxically positioned as inclusive on grounds of strong communal values. The school however, struggles with difference and diversity of a certain kind, despite its purportedly strong communal spirit and strong religious culture. This study set out to probe how stakeholders understood inclusive education in an attempt to explain how this influenced their practice of inclusive education.
Lewin’s theory of Planned Change and four belief systems were utilized to examine the understanding and practice of stakeholders at the school. The study suggested that the four belief systems influenced the way in which inclusive education was both understood and practised in this school. The study argued for the recognition of the importance of different belief systems in the implementation of inclusion in South Africa.
The main research question which guided the study was:
How has inclusive education policy been implemented in a mono-cultural community school in South Africa, with the three sub–questions being: 1. How do the various school stakeholders understand the concept of inclusion and what are their attitudes towards inclusion?
2. How is inclusive education managed at class, school and community level?
3. To what extent do their attitudes and understandings influence their practice of inclusive education?
It was conducted within an interpretative/constructivist research paradigm and utilized a case study design. It relied on qualitative methods of data generation such as insider interviews, personal accounts and document analysis. The participants were drawn from four stakeholder groups, namely, teachers, parents, middle managers and top managers.
The descriptions of the stakeholders’ understandings that emerged in this study highlighted how belief systems determined the action towards inclusive education and how despite the school being a community school, the community discourse did not prevail in the actions towards inclusive education, it was the individual beliefs which vied for dominance which determined inclusive action. This resulted in a qualified and fragmented inclusion and in some cases exclusion. The findings were linked to Lewin’s planned approach to change including field theoretical and group dynamic theories. The study concluded that the four belief systems influenced the way in which inclusive education was both understood and practised in this school and the study argued for the recognition of the importance of different belief systems in the implementation of inclusion in South Africa. === Thesis (PhD)--University of Pretoria, 2013. === am2013 === Education Management and Policy Studies === unrestricted |
author2 |
Herman, Chaya |
author_facet |
Herman, Chaya Meltz, Adrienne |
author |
Meltz, Adrienne |
author_sort |
Meltz, Adrienne |
title |
The understanding and practice of inclusive education in a Jewish community school in South Africa |
title_short |
The understanding and practice of inclusive education in a Jewish community school in South Africa |
title_full |
The understanding and practice of inclusive education in a Jewish community school in South Africa |
title_fullStr |
The understanding and practice of inclusive education in a Jewish community school in South Africa |
title_full_unstemmed |
The understanding and practice of inclusive education in a Jewish community school in South Africa |
title_sort |
understanding and practice of inclusive education in a jewish community school in south africa |
publisher |
University of Pretoria |
publishDate |
2013 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/32467 Meltz, A. 2013, The understanding and practice of inclusive education in a Jewish community school in South Africa, PhD thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/32467> |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT meltzadrienne theunderstandingandpracticeofinclusiveeducationinajewishcommunityschoolinsouthafrica AT meltzadrienne understandingandpracticeofinclusiveeducationinajewishcommunityschoolinsouthafrica |
_version_ |
1719358515834781696 |
spelling |
ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-up-oai-repository.up.ac.za-2263-324672020-11-21T05:20:19Z The understanding and practice of inclusive education in a Jewish community school in South Africa Meltz, Adrienne Herman, Chaya adrienne.meltz@gmail.com Pillay, Venitha South Africa Jewish community school Inclusive education Lewin’s Theory Special needs Disability Beliefs Faith–based Conditional inclusion Qualitative research Insider interviews Document analysis Case study Interpretative/constructivist UCTD This qualitative study, pursued within a one–site case study, explores the understanding and implementation of inclusive education in an independent Jewish community school in Johannesburg, South Africa nineteen years post democracy. It analyses the phenomenon of inclusion in a school with a community ethos of care and belonging whose context is by definition exclusionary on grounds of a particular social category, religion. Because of its exclusionary agenda the school can be paradoxically positioned as inclusive on grounds of strong communal values. The school however, struggles with difference and diversity of a certain kind, despite its purportedly strong communal spirit and strong religious culture. This study set out to probe how stakeholders understood inclusive education in an attempt to explain how this influenced their practice of inclusive education. Lewin’s theory of Planned Change and four belief systems were utilized to examine the understanding and practice of stakeholders at the school. The study suggested that the four belief systems influenced the way in which inclusive education was both understood and practised in this school. The study argued for the recognition of the importance of different belief systems in the implementation of inclusion in South Africa. The main research question which guided the study was: How has inclusive education policy been implemented in a mono-cultural community school in South Africa, with the three sub–questions being: 1. How do the various school stakeholders understand the concept of inclusion and what are their attitudes towards inclusion? 2. How is inclusive education managed at class, school and community level? 3. To what extent do their attitudes and understandings influence their practice of inclusive education? It was conducted within an interpretative/constructivist research paradigm and utilized a case study design. It relied on qualitative methods of data generation such as insider interviews, personal accounts and document analysis. The participants were drawn from four stakeholder groups, namely, teachers, parents, middle managers and top managers. The descriptions of the stakeholders’ understandings that emerged in this study highlighted how belief systems determined the action towards inclusive education and how despite the school being a community school, the community discourse did not prevail in the actions towards inclusive education, it was the individual beliefs which vied for dominance which determined inclusive action. This resulted in a qualified and fragmented inclusion and in some cases exclusion. The findings were linked to Lewin’s planned approach to change including field theoretical and group dynamic theories. The study concluded that the four belief systems influenced the way in which inclusive education was both understood and practised in this school and the study argued for the recognition of the importance of different belief systems in the implementation of inclusion in South Africa. Thesis (PhD)--University of Pretoria, 2013. am2013 Education Management and Policy Studies unrestricted 2013-11-19T09:13:39Z 2013-11-19T09:13:39Z 2013-09-04 2013 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/2263/32467 Meltz, A. 2013, The understanding and practice of inclusive education in a Jewish community school in South Africa, PhD thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/32467> D13/9/843 Eng © 2013 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria University of Pretoria |