Is the reporting obligation of attorneys in terms of section 29 of the Financial Intelligence Centre Act 38 of 2001 a myth or a reality?

Is the reporting obligation of attorneys in terms of section 29 of the Financial Intelligence Centre Act 38 of 2001 a myth or a reality?

This research examines an attorney’s reporting obligation in terms of section 29 of the Financial Intelligence Centre Act 38 of 2001 (FICA) to report suspicious and unusual transactions, which are not subject to legal professional privilege. In order to contextualise this reporting obligation and to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Burdette, Marine
Other Authors: Prof P Carstens
Published: 2013
Subjects:
Financial intelligence centre act 38 of 2001
Fica
UCTD
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2263/25166
Burdette, M 2010, Is the reporting obligation of attorneys in terms of section 29 of the Financial Intelligence Centre Act 38 of 2001 a myth or a reality?, LLM dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd < http://hdl.handle.net/2263/25166 >
http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-05312011-171223/

Internet

http://hdl.handle.net/2263/25166
Burdette, M 2010, Is the reporting obligation of attorneys in terms of section 29 of the Financial Intelligence Centre Act 38 of 2001 a myth or a reality?, LLM dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd < http://hdl.handle.net/2263/25166 >
http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-05312011-171223/

Similar Items