An analysis of De Klerk v Du Plessis 1994 6 BCLR 124 (T) in the light of section 35(3) of the constitution of South Africa Act 200 of 1993

An analysis of De Klerk v Du Plessis 1994 6 BCLR 124 (T) in the light of section 35(3) of the constitution of South Africa Act 200 of 1993

Show other versions (1)

The issue of the vertical /or horizontal operation of the Bill of Rights (chapter 3) is a controversial one. The interim constitution deals with this controversy in a subtle way by avoiding direct horizontal operation of Chapter 3. Instead, it provides for the so-called 'seepage to horizontal r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Selokela, Kwena Alfred
Other Authors: Botha, C. J. (Christo J.)
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Analysis
De Klerk v Du Plessis
Section 35 (3)
Constitutional interpretation
Purposive approach
Vertical operation
Horizontal operation
Bill of Rights
Retrospective operation
Interim Constitution
342.8506802643
Human rights > South Africa
Constitutional law > South Africa > Interpretation and construction
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10500/17711

Internet

http://hdl.handle.net/10500/17711

Similar Items