Responding to student writing : strategies for a distance-teaching context

• Main Author: Spencer, Brenda
• Other Authors: Kilfoil, W. R. (Wendy Ruth), 1952-
• Format: Others
• Language: en
• Published: 2015
• Subjects: 808.0420711; Written communication; Creative writing (Higher education); Tutors and tutoring; English language > Rhetoric > Study and teaching (Higher); English language > Composition and exercises > Ability testing; Academic writing > Evaluation; College prose > Evaluation
• Online Access: Spencer, Brenda (1998) Responding to student writing : strategies for a distance-teaching context, University of South Africa, Pretoria, <http://hdl.handle.net/10500/16094>; http://hdl.handle.net/10500/16094

Responding to Student Writing: Strategies for a Distance-Teaching Context identifies viable response techniques for a unique discourse community. An overview of paradigmatic shifts in writing and reading theory, 'frameworks of response' developed to classify response statements for research purposes, and an overview of research in the field provide the theoretical basis for the evaluation of the empirical study. The research comprises a three-fold exploration of the response strategies adopted by Unisa lecturers to the writing of Practical English (PENl00-3) students. In the first phase the focus falls on the effect of intervention on the students' revised drafts of four divergent marking strategies - coded correction, minimal marking, taped response and self assessment. All the experimental strategies tested result in statistically-significant improvement levels in the revised draft. The benefits of self assessment and rewriting, even without tutorial intervention, were demonstrated. The study is unique by virtue of its distance-teaching context, its sample size of 1750 and in the high significance levels achieved. The second phase of the research consisted of a questionnaire that determined 2640 students' expectations with respect to marking, the value of commentary, their perceptions of markers' roles and their opinions of the experimental strategies tested. Their responses were also correlated with their final Practical English examination results. The third phase examined tutorial response. The framework of response, developed for the purpose, revealed that present response strategies represent a regression to the traditional product-orientated approach to writing that contradicts the cognitive and rhetorical axiological basis of the course. There is thus a disjunction between the teaching and theoretical practices. The final chapter bridges this gap by examining issues of audience, transparency, ownership, timing of intervention and training. The researcher believes that she has successfully identified practical and innovative strategies that assist lecturers in a distance-teaching context to break away from old response blueprints. === English Studies === D.Litt. et Phil. (English)