Pay for performance, inequalities, and diabetes care

Background: The Quality and Outcome Framework (QOF) is a major pay for performance scheme that was introduced in 2004 in the UK. The introduction of QOF is a unique opportunity to evaluate the impact of pay for performance on inequalities and in particular on ethnic inequalities. This thesis examine...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alshamsan, Riyadh
Other Authors: Millett, Christopher ; Majeed, Azeem
Published: Imperial College London 2012
Subjects:
361
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.544264
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-544264
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-5442642017-08-30T03:16:38ZPay for performance, inequalities, and diabetes careAlshamsan, RiyadhMillett, Christopher ; Majeed, Azeem2012Background: The Quality and Outcome Framework (QOF) is a major pay for performance scheme that was introduced in 2004 in the UK. The introduction of QOF is a unique opportunity to evaluate the impact of pay for performance on inequalities and in particular on ethnic inequalities. This thesis examines the impact of QOF on ethnic inequalities and on patients with and without comorbidities in diabetes management. Methods: (1) Interrupted time series analysis of electronic medical record data of diabetes patients registered with 29 family practices in South West London for the years 2000 to 2007. (2) Cross-sectional study to examine the association between ethnicity, concordant and discordant comorbidity status and intermediate outcomes (HbA1c, blood pressure, total cholesterol). Results: The quality of diabetes care, as measured by the QOF indicators, has improved substantially throughout the study period, especially for the process aspect of care. The introduction of QOF was associated with initial additional improvements in systolic blood pressure in white and black patients but this was only sustained in black patients. Initial improvements in diastolic blood pressure in white and in cholesterol in black and white patients were not sustained in the post-QOF period. There was no beneficial impact of QOF on HbA1c in any ethnic group. The presence of ≥2 cardiovascular comorbidities was associated with similar blood pressure control among white and South Asian patients when compared with whites without comorbidity but with worse blood pressure control among black patients. Conclusion: The QOF scheme did not appear to address important inequalities in diabetes management over time. Targeted quality improvement strategies may be required to improve health care in vulnerable populations.361Imperial College Londonhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.544264http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/9207Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 361
spellingShingle 361
Alshamsan, Riyadh
Pay for performance, inequalities, and diabetes care
description Background: The Quality and Outcome Framework (QOF) is a major pay for performance scheme that was introduced in 2004 in the UK. The introduction of QOF is a unique opportunity to evaluate the impact of pay for performance on inequalities and in particular on ethnic inequalities. This thesis examines the impact of QOF on ethnic inequalities and on patients with and without comorbidities in diabetes management. Methods: (1) Interrupted time series analysis of electronic medical record data of diabetes patients registered with 29 family practices in South West London for the years 2000 to 2007. (2) Cross-sectional study to examine the association between ethnicity, concordant and discordant comorbidity status and intermediate outcomes (HbA1c, blood pressure, total cholesterol). Results: The quality of diabetes care, as measured by the QOF indicators, has improved substantially throughout the study period, especially for the process aspect of care. The introduction of QOF was associated with initial additional improvements in systolic blood pressure in white and black patients but this was only sustained in black patients. Initial improvements in diastolic blood pressure in white and in cholesterol in black and white patients were not sustained in the post-QOF period. There was no beneficial impact of QOF on HbA1c in any ethnic group. The presence of ≥2 cardiovascular comorbidities was associated with similar blood pressure control among white and South Asian patients when compared with whites without comorbidity but with worse blood pressure control among black patients. Conclusion: The QOF scheme did not appear to address important inequalities in diabetes management over time. Targeted quality improvement strategies may be required to improve health care in vulnerable populations.
author2 Millett, Christopher ; Majeed, Azeem
author_facet Millett, Christopher ; Majeed, Azeem
Alshamsan, Riyadh
author Alshamsan, Riyadh
author_sort Alshamsan, Riyadh
title Pay for performance, inequalities, and diabetes care
title_short Pay for performance, inequalities, and diabetes care
title_full Pay for performance, inequalities, and diabetes care
title_fullStr Pay for performance, inequalities, and diabetes care
title_full_unstemmed Pay for performance, inequalities, and diabetes care
title_sort pay for performance, inequalities, and diabetes care
publisher Imperial College London
publishDate 2012
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.544264
work_keys_str_mv AT alshamsanriyadh payforperformanceinequalitiesanddiabetescare
_version_ 1718521590853926912