The experience curve and limit pricing as means of integrating portfolio matrices into capital budgeting

This thesis develops a model for the net present value to the firm of a strategy of increasing an SBU's market share as a function of four quantitative variables: the firm's initial market share, the current position in the product life cycle, as viewed by the firm, the competitor's r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marshall, Paul S.
Published: University of Bath 1985
Subjects:
658
Online Access:https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.353194
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-353194
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-3531942019-03-14T03:37:39ZThe experience curve and limit pricing as means of integrating portfolio matrices into capital budgetingMarshall, Paul S.1985This thesis develops a model for the net present value to the firm of a strategy of increasing an SBU's market share as a function of four quantitative variables: the firm's initial market share, the current position in the product life cycle, as viewed by the firm, the competitor's relative experience curve slope and the competitor's view of the shape and size of the product life cycle. The net present value is calculated using traditional definitions, but includes a limit pricing strategy by the firm and assumes the existence of the experience curve. The prime reason for the development of this model is to test quantitatively the capital budgeting implications of the portfolio matrices proposed by the Boston Consulting Group and McKinsey and Company. And, to suggest a format that better integrates corporate strategy and finance. The most important finding of this research is that the inclusion of experience curve effects causes relative market share to assume dominance over market growth rate in the BCG matrix and causes business strength to assume dominance over industry attractiveness in the McKinsey matrix, at least within the limitations and assumptions of the model. Put into laymen's terms, that means that corporate planners should abandon attempts to convert low share but high growth businesses (what BCG calls "Problem Children") into "Stars", if such conversion can only be accomplished .through price, or price equivalent competition, as long as both participants are equally competent. A second important finding is that other variables, beyond growth and share, can be successfully and quantitatively incorporated into the model. This means that the two-dimensional approach of the Boston Consulting Group can be improved upon by adding additional variables or that businessmen can make better use of the McKinsey approach to strategy and its investment implications, by logically quantifying their variables.658Corporate strategy and financeUniversity of Bathhttps://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.353194Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 658
Corporate strategy and finance
spellingShingle 658
Corporate strategy and finance
Marshall, Paul S.
The experience curve and limit pricing as means of integrating portfolio matrices into capital budgeting
description This thesis develops a model for the net present value to the firm of a strategy of increasing an SBU's market share as a function of four quantitative variables: the firm's initial market share, the current position in the product life cycle, as viewed by the firm, the competitor's relative experience curve slope and the competitor's view of the shape and size of the product life cycle. The net present value is calculated using traditional definitions, but includes a limit pricing strategy by the firm and assumes the existence of the experience curve. The prime reason for the development of this model is to test quantitatively the capital budgeting implications of the portfolio matrices proposed by the Boston Consulting Group and McKinsey and Company. And, to suggest a format that better integrates corporate strategy and finance. The most important finding of this research is that the inclusion of experience curve effects causes relative market share to assume dominance over market growth rate in the BCG matrix and causes business strength to assume dominance over industry attractiveness in the McKinsey matrix, at least within the limitations and assumptions of the model. Put into laymen's terms, that means that corporate planners should abandon attempts to convert low share but high growth businesses (what BCG calls "Problem Children") into "Stars", if such conversion can only be accomplished .through price, or price equivalent competition, as long as both participants are equally competent. A second important finding is that other variables, beyond growth and share, can be successfully and quantitatively incorporated into the model. This means that the two-dimensional approach of the Boston Consulting Group can be improved upon by adding additional variables or that businessmen can make better use of the McKinsey approach to strategy and its investment implications, by logically quantifying their variables.
author Marshall, Paul S.
author_facet Marshall, Paul S.
author_sort Marshall, Paul S.
title The experience curve and limit pricing as means of integrating portfolio matrices into capital budgeting
title_short The experience curve and limit pricing as means of integrating portfolio matrices into capital budgeting
title_full The experience curve and limit pricing as means of integrating portfolio matrices into capital budgeting
title_fullStr The experience curve and limit pricing as means of integrating portfolio matrices into capital budgeting
title_full_unstemmed The experience curve and limit pricing as means of integrating portfolio matrices into capital budgeting
title_sort experience curve and limit pricing as means of integrating portfolio matrices into capital budgeting
publisher University of Bath
publishDate 1985
url https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.353194
work_keys_str_mv AT marshallpauls theexperiencecurveandlimitpricingasmeansofintegratingportfoliomatricesintocapitalbudgeting
AT marshallpauls experiencecurveandlimitpricingasmeansofintegratingportfoliomatricesintocapitalbudgeting
_version_ 1719002809639108608