Dimensions and Levels of Students' Understanding of Area Measurement

Based on a synthesis of prior research, this study proposes a three dimensional framework to describe the cognitive achievements important for understanding area measurement in upper elementary school years (grade 4-6). Levels within each of the three dimensions were specified. Items were developed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zhou, Wenyan
Other Authors: Sun-Joo Cho
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: VANDERBILT 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-03292012-041328/
id ndltd-VANDERBILT-oai-VANDERBILTETD-etd-03292012-041328
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-VANDERBILT-oai-VANDERBILTETD-etd-03292012-0413282013-01-08T17:16:55Z Dimensions and Levels of Students' Understanding of Area Measurement Zhou, Wenyan Teaching and Learning Based on a synthesis of prior research, this study proposes a three dimensional framework to describe the cognitive achievements important for understanding area measurement in upper elementary school years (grade 4-6). Levels within each of the three dimensions were specified. Items were developed to elicit performances indicative of those levels. To refine the items prior to field testing, cognitive interviews were conducted with 28 students (grade 4-5) recruited from two schools in the southeastern US. Sixty items were selected and revised based on results of the cognitive interviews. These 60 items were then piloted with a sample of 267 students (grade 4-6) recruited from the same schools from which participants of the cognitive interviews were recruited. The psychometric properties of the items were analyzed using both classical methods and item response theories (IRT) models. The IRT analyses indicate that the three-dimensional model fits better than the one- and two-dimensional models. Furthermore, the order of the items in general follows the order of the levels they targeted. Quality of the assessment was examined regarding both its reliability and validity. While there might be some concerns of gender DIF in a few of the items, in general the psychometric properties of the assessment were satisfactory. In summary, the results of this study supports the three dimensional framework for describing cognitive achievements in understanding area measurement. Sun-Joo Cho Georgene Troseth Leona Schauble Rogers Hall Rich Lehrer VANDERBILT 2012-04-16 text application/pdf http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-03292012-041328/ http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-03292012-041328/ en restricted I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to Vanderbilt University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Teaching and Learning
spellingShingle Teaching and Learning
Zhou, Wenyan
Dimensions and Levels of Students' Understanding of Area Measurement
description Based on a synthesis of prior research, this study proposes a three dimensional framework to describe the cognitive achievements important for understanding area measurement in upper elementary school years (grade 4-6). Levels within each of the three dimensions were specified. Items were developed to elicit performances indicative of those levels. To refine the items prior to field testing, cognitive interviews were conducted with 28 students (grade 4-5) recruited from two schools in the southeastern US. Sixty items were selected and revised based on results of the cognitive interviews. These 60 items were then piloted with a sample of 267 students (grade 4-6) recruited from the same schools from which participants of the cognitive interviews were recruited. The psychometric properties of the items were analyzed using both classical methods and item response theories (IRT) models. The IRT analyses indicate that the three-dimensional model fits better than the one- and two-dimensional models. Furthermore, the order of the items in general follows the order of the levels they targeted. Quality of the assessment was examined regarding both its reliability and validity. While there might be some concerns of gender DIF in a few of the items, in general the psychometric properties of the assessment were satisfactory. In summary, the results of this study supports the three dimensional framework for describing cognitive achievements in understanding area measurement.
author2 Sun-Joo Cho
author_facet Sun-Joo Cho
Zhou, Wenyan
author Zhou, Wenyan
author_sort Zhou, Wenyan
title Dimensions and Levels of Students' Understanding of Area Measurement
title_short Dimensions and Levels of Students' Understanding of Area Measurement
title_full Dimensions and Levels of Students' Understanding of Area Measurement
title_fullStr Dimensions and Levels of Students' Understanding of Area Measurement
title_full_unstemmed Dimensions and Levels of Students' Understanding of Area Measurement
title_sort dimensions and levels of students' understanding of area measurement
publisher VANDERBILT
publishDate 2012
url http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-03292012-041328/
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouwenyan dimensionsandlevelsofstudentsunderstandingofareameasurement
_version_ 1716570528018333696