Adhesion Comparison of Low Dielectric Constant Thin Films Using Four Point Bend and Nanoscratch Testing

As the semiconductor technology moves further into scaled down device structures, modern day complexities in the fabrication processes become more prevalent. This thesis focuses on the issues associated with mechaincal and adhesion failure in low dielectric constant (low-k) thin films. In this thesi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vilceus, Daniel
Format: Others
Published: Scholar Commons 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/547
https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1546&context=etd
id ndltd-USF-oai-scholarcommons.usf.edu-etd-1546
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-USF-oai-scholarcommons.usf.edu-etd-15462019-10-04T05:19:39Z Adhesion Comparison of Low Dielectric Constant Thin Films Using Four Point Bend and Nanoscratch Testing Vilceus, Daniel As the semiconductor technology moves further into scaled down device structures, modern day complexities in the fabrication processes become more prevalent. This thesis focuses on the issues associated with mechaincal and adhesion failure in low dielectric constant (low-k) thin films. In this thesis the four point bend test and nanoscratch test method was used for evaluating adhesion of boro-phosphate-silicate glass (BPSG) and tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS) low-k thin films to silicon subtrates. Nanoindation tests were also performed on the low-k films to evaluate material properties such as hardness and elastic modulus. The sample preparation and testing set up for the four point bend test and nanoscratch test were observed to be greatly disparate. Nanoscratch and nanoindentation sample preparation and sample testing were able to be carried out much quicker than in four point bending. It was observed that nanoscratch testing holds an immense potential for reducing the time needed to evaluate thin film adhesion then in FPB testing. Nanoindentation performed on the BPSG and TEOS dielectric thin films showed uniform mechinacal properties throughout the surface of the films. The adhesion energy for BPSG and TEOS using FPB testing ranged from 29.5390 J/m² - 3.0379 J/m². While the adhesion energy for BPSG and TEOS using nanoscratch testing ranged from 0.0012 J/m² - 0.0028 J/m². It was observed that the difference in adhesion energy for FPB and nanoscratch testing was due to differing failures modes. 2008-05-29T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/547 https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1546&context=etd default Graduate Theses and Dissertations Scholar Commons Epoxy Fracture Hardness Modulus Notch silicon American Studies Arts and Humanities
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Epoxy
Fracture
Hardness
Modulus
Notch
silicon
American Studies
Arts and Humanities
spellingShingle Epoxy
Fracture
Hardness
Modulus
Notch
silicon
American Studies
Arts and Humanities
Vilceus, Daniel
Adhesion Comparison of Low Dielectric Constant Thin Films Using Four Point Bend and Nanoscratch Testing
description As the semiconductor technology moves further into scaled down device structures, modern day complexities in the fabrication processes become more prevalent. This thesis focuses on the issues associated with mechaincal and adhesion failure in low dielectric constant (low-k) thin films. In this thesis the four point bend test and nanoscratch test method was used for evaluating adhesion of boro-phosphate-silicate glass (BPSG) and tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS) low-k thin films to silicon subtrates. Nanoindation tests were also performed on the low-k films to evaluate material properties such as hardness and elastic modulus. The sample preparation and testing set up for the four point bend test and nanoscratch test were observed to be greatly disparate. Nanoscratch and nanoindentation sample preparation and sample testing were able to be carried out much quicker than in four point bending. It was observed that nanoscratch testing holds an immense potential for reducing the time needed to evaluate thin film adhesion then in FPB testing. Nanoindentation performed on the BPSG and TEOS dielectric thin films showed uniform mechinacal properties throughout the surface of the films. The adhesion energy for BPSG and TEOS using FPB testing ranged from 29.5390 J/m² - 3.0379 J/m². While the adhesion energy for BPSG and TEOS using nanoscratch testing ranged from 0.0012 J/m² - 0.0028 J/m². It was observed that the difference in adhesion energy for FPB and nanoscratch testing was due to differing failures modes.
author Vilceus, Daniel
author_facet Vilceus, Daniel
author_sort Vilceus, Daniel
title Adhesion Comparison of Low Dielectric Constant Thin Films Using Four Point Bend and Nanoscratch Testing
title_short Adhesion Comparison of Low Dielectric Constant Thin Films Using Four Point Bend and Nanoscratch Testing
title_full Adhesion Comparison of Low Dielectric Constant Thin Films Using Four Point Bend and Nanoscratch Testing
title_fullStr Adhesion Comparison of Low Dielectric Constant Thin Films Using Four Point Bend and Nanoscratch Testing
title_full_unstemmed Adhesion Comparison of Low Dielectric Constant Thin Films Using Four Point Bend and Nanoscratch Testing
title_sort adhesion comparison of low dielectric constant thin films using four point bend and nanoscratch testing
publisher Scholar Commons
publishDate 2008
url https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/547
https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1546&context=etd
work_keys_str_mv AT vilceusdaniel adhesioncomparisonoflowdielectricconstantthinfilmsusingfourpointbendandnanoscratchtesting
_version_ 1719260599595040768