Power consciousness: Understanding and transforming educator classroom power

This study examines the issue of educator power in the classroom and suggests a practical mechanism by which educators can reflect on their power use and develop a deeper consciousness of it in their teaching. A review of the literature conducted for this study revealed a gap in the discussion of ed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hackman, Heather W
Language:ENG
Published: ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst 2000
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations/AAI9988794
Description
Summary:This study examines the issue of educator power in the classroom and suggests a practical mechanism by which educators can reflect on their power use and develop a deeper consciousness of it in their teaching. A review of the literature conducted for this study revealed a gap in the discussion of educator power between the theoretical and practice-oriented literature bases. This study considers whether a comparable gap exists in actual practice and through phenomenological interviews investigates the perceptions of classroom power use for ten faculty in higher education. Through classroom observations, these perceptions are compared to classroom practices for all participants and gaps are seen for all ten participants. The theoretical frame of analysis for this study is drawn from the review of the educational literature including critical and feminist pedagogy, multicultural, social justice, humanistic, and teacher education, as well as faculty development and self awareness literatures. The examination of this literature highlights the areas of educator power presently underinvestigated in both theory and practice. Specifically, this review lead to the development of two models for understanding educator power: the Spheres of Educator Power and the Sites of Educator Power. The Spheres model is an organizational schema that groups educator power into three primary ‘spheres’, Public, Private and Intimate, with the bulk of the literature addressing the Public and the Private leaving the Intimate significantly underinvestigated. The Sites model further explores the Intimate Sphere and identifies seven fundamental sites of educator power in the classroom—social identity, teacher education programs, educational biography, personal history, content mastery, student abdication, and institutional conferrence. These two frames for understanding educator power, combined with the interview and observational results, are the foundation of an action—reflection model, the Power Praxis model, designed to assist educators in becoming more conscious of their use of power in the classroom. Rooted in the aforementioned literatures, it is believed that a deeper awareness of the use of educator power in the classroom as a result of this model will lead to a more empowering educational experience for both students and educators.