Do 9-month-old infants expect distinct words to refer to kinds?

Three experiments investigated [t]he effect of labeling on 9-month-old infants’ object representations. During familiarization, a box was opened to reveal two objects inside: either two identical objects or two different objects. Test trials followed the same procedure except, before the box was ope...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dewar, Kathryn Megan
Language:English
Published: 2010
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/17927
id ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-17927
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-179272018-01-05T17:39:10Z Do 9-month-old infants expect distinct words to refer to kinds? Dewar, Kathryn Megan Three experiments investigated [t]he effect of labeling on 9-month-old infants’ object representations. During familiarization, a box was opened to reveal two objects inside: either two identical objects or two different objects. Test trials followed the same procedure except, before the box was opened, the contents were described using either two distinct labels ("I see a wug! I see a dak!") or the same label twice ("I see a zav! I see a zav!"). Infants hearing different labels looked longer at two identical objects versus two different objects. This pattern was reversed when infants heard a label repeated twice. The property of shape is a salient cue to kind membership and infants may expect different-shaped objects to be marked by different labels. However, they should not have this expectation for objects that differ in a kind-independent property, like colour. A second and third experiment where different object pairs differed only in shape and colour, respectively, confirmed these predictions. These results suggest that, prior to word learning, infants may expect distinct labels to refer to distinct kinds. Arts, Faculty of Psychology, Department of Graduate 2010-01-08T22:42:14Z 2010-01-08T22:42:14Z 2006 2006-11 Text Thesis/Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/17927 eng For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
collection NDLTD
language English
sources NDLTD
description Three experiments investigated [t]he effect of labeling on 9-month-old infants’ object representations. During familiarization, a box was opened to reveal two objects inside: either two identical objects or two different objects. Test trials followed the same procedure except, before the box was opened, the contents were described using either two distinct labels ("I see a wug! I see a dak!") or the same label twice ("I see a zav! I see a zav!"). Infants hearing different labels looked longer at two identical objects versus two different objects. This pattern was reversed when infants heard a label repeated twice. The property of shape is a salient cue to kind membership and infants may expect different-shaped objects to be marked by different labels. However, they should not have this expectation for objects that differ in a kind-independent property, like colour. A second and third experiment where different object pairs differed only in shape and colour, respectively, confirmed these predictions. These results suggest that, prior to word learning, infants may expect distinct labels to refer to distinct kinds. === Arts, Faculty of === Psychology, Department of === Graduate
author Dewar, Kathryn Megan
spellingShingle Dewar, Kathryn Megan
Do 9-month-old infants expect distinct words to refer to kinds?
author_facet Dewar, Kathryn Megan
author_sort Dewar, Kathryn Megan
title Do 9-month-old infants expect distinct words to refer to kinds?
title_short Do 9-month-old infants expect distinct words to refer to kinds?
title_full Do 9-month-old infants expect distinct words to refer to kinds?
title_fullStr Do 9-month-old infants expect distinct words to refer to kinds?
title_full_unstemmed Do 9-month-old infants expect distinct words to refer to kinds?
title_sort do 9-month-old infants expect distinct words to refer to kinds?
publishDate 2010
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/17927
work_keys_str_mv AT dewarkathrynmegan do9montholdinfantsexpectdistinctwordstorefertokinds
_version_ 1718590686408736768