An Investigation of English Academic Writing Process: A Case Study of Novice EFL Writers

碩士 === 淡江大學 === 英文學系碩士班 === 105 === The purpose of this study was to investigate novice student writers’ (NSWs) L2 academic writing processes. The participants were four freshmen business majors. The study has three foci: the topic selection, the incorporation of relevant academic writing feedback,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jill Shu-Chen Chang, 張淑貞
Other Authors: 黃月貴
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: 2017
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/y22r3c
id ndltd-TW-105TKU00154001
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-105TKU001540012019-08-20T03:34:49Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/y22r3c An Investigation of English Academic Writing Process: A Case Study of Novice EFL Writers 探討大一學生的英文學術寫作過程 - 個案探討 Jill Shu-Chen Chang 張淑貞 碩士 淡江大學 英文學系碩士班 105 The purpose of this study was to investigate novice student writers’ (NSWs) L2 academic writing processes. The participants were four freshmen business majors. The study has three foci: the topic selection, the incorporation of relevant academic writing feedback, and three self-revisions. Drawing on qualitative research, data was collected from pre-interview questionnaires, interview transcripts, NSWs’ writing samples, teachers’ feedback along with subsequent revisions, and three self-revisions along with open-ended questionnaires. The results of the research showed that the NSWs’ background knowledge constituted a major factor driving them to decide their L2 academic writing topics. On top of that, L1 played a crucial role on NSW’s L2 academic writing. The diversity of teachers’ feedbacks including local, global, and some writing strategies did help the NSWs to overcome some writing difficulties. However, they were unable to incorporate all the feedback immediately due to their limited linguistic and L2 academic writing knowledge. They mainly focused on the local errors corrections on their subsequent revisions. Furthermore, in the three self-revisions, they tried to use connectors to connect sentences and paragraphs, substitute words to replace their original use, and change sentence structures or organizational arrangements to convey meaning, all of which demonstrating NSWs’ increased awareness of the use of cohesive devices, and the importance of lexical choices and organizational flow in presenting ideas. Findings of the study echo the importance of reading input as a means to build fundamental background knowledge and linguistic ability to the development of writing skills. 黃月貴 2017 學位論文 ; thesis 113 en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 淡江大學 === 英文學系碩士班 === 105 === The purpose of this study was to investigate novice student writers’ (NSWs) L2 academic writing processes. The participants were four freshmen business majors. The study has three foci: the topic selection, the incorporation of relevant academic writing feedback, and three self-revisions. Drawing on qualitative research, data was collected from pre-interview questionnaires, interview transcripts, NSWs’ writing samples, teachers’ feedback along with subsequent revisions, and three self-revisions along with open-ended questionnaires. The results of the research showed that the NSWs’ background knowledge constituted a major factor driving them to decide their L2 academic writing topics. On top of that, L1 played a crucial role on NSW’s L2 academic writing. The diversity of teachers’ feedbacks including local, global, and some writing strategies did help the NSWs to overcome some writing difficulties. However, they were unable to incorporate all the feedback immediately due to their limited linguistic and L2 academic writing knowledge. They mainly focused on the local errors corrections on their subsequent revisions. Furthermore, in the three self-revisions, they tried to use connectors to connect sentences and paragraphs, substitute words to replace their original use, and change sentence structures or organizational arrangements to convey meaning, all of which demonstrating NSWs’ increased awareness of the use of cohesive devices, and the importance of lexical choices and organizational flow in presenting ideas. Findings of the study echo the importance of reading input as a means to build fundamental background knowledge and linguistic ability to the development of writing skills.
author2 黃月貴
author_facet 黃月貴
Jill Shu-Chen Chang
張淑貞
author Jill Shu-Chen Chang
張淑貞
spellingShingle Jill Shu-Chen Chang
張淑貞
An Investigation of English Academic Writing Process: A Case Study of Novice EFL Writers
author_sort Jill Shu-Chen Chang
title An Investigation of English Academic Writing Process: A Case Study of Novice EFL Writers
title_short An Investigation of English Academic Writing Process: A Case Study of Novice EFL Writers
title_full An Investigation of English Academic Writing Process: A Case Study of Novice EFL Writers
title_fullStr An Investigation of English Academic Writing Process: A Case Study of Novice EFL Writers
title_full_unstemmed An Investigation of English Academic Writing Process: A Case Study of Novice EFL Writers
title_sort investigation of english academic writing process: a case study of novice efl writers
publishDate 2017
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/y22r3c
work_keys_str_mv AT jillshuchenchang aninvestigationofenglishacademicwritingprocessacasestudyofnoviceeflwriters
AT zhāngshūzhēn aninvestigationofenglishacademicwritingprocessacasestudyofnoviceeflwriters
AT jillshuchenchang tàntǎodàyīxuéshēngdeyīngwénxuéshùxiězuòguòchénggèàntàntǎo
AT zhāngshūzhēn tàntǎodàyīxuéshēngdeyīngwénxuéshùxiězuòguòchénggèàntàntǎo
AT jillshuchenchang investigationofenglishacademicwritingprocessacasestudyofnoviceeflwriters
AT zhāngshūzhēn investigationofenglishacademicwritingprocessacasestudyofnoviceeflwriters
_version_ 1719235639820419072