Assessing Students’ Science Writing Performance With Peer Assessment

碩士 === 國立新竹教育大學 === 應用科學系碩士班 === 95 === Assessing Students’ Science Writing Performance With Peer Assessment Abstract The purpose of this study was to survey the effects by assessing students’ science writing performance with peer assessment for the curriculum of science and technology field. In thi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: 周資娟
Other Authors: 許春峰
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2007
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/01634092038006806765
Description
Summary:碩士 === 國立新竹教育大學 === 應用科學系碩士班 === 95 === Assessing Students’ Science Writing Performance With Peer Assessment Abstract The purpose of this study was to survey the effects by assessing students’ science writing performance with peer assessment for the curriculum of science and technology field. In this study, we adopted the method of pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design. The subjects were two fifth-grade classes of one elementary school in Taipei city, 30 children in each class. One of these two classes was the experimental and the other was control group. The experimental group was taught with the instruction of science writing and peer assessment , while the other group was taught only with the instruction of science writing. There were several findings. 1. There is no significant difference in learning achievement in natural sciences between students who receive science writing and peer assessment instructions and those who are given science writing. 2. The results showed that peer assessment can help promote students’ attitue toward to science writing. 3. By using science writing and peer assessment instructions could promote the students' the metacognition ability. 4. There were good validity and reliability among the elementary school students' peer assessment. The scores of peer assessment were significantly correlated with the scores of teacher assessment. 5. The elementary school students accepted the way of peer assessment highly. But different level students have different constructing comments. Finally, the researcher induced research conclusions, and offered some suggestions for applications and future research.