Argument analysis and knowledge construction of whole-class discussion in the scientific classroom at elementary school
碩士 === 國立臺南大學 === 自然科學教育學系碩士班 === 93 === This research aims to understand the types of students’ scientific arguments, the ways to rebut others’arguments, the responds to others’ counterarguments, the episteme, and the influences of teacher’s authority in whole-class discussion. This qualitative inv...
Main Authors: | Yi-jeng Tsai, 蔡怡錚 |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Jer-Yann Lin |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2005
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/61093803437490652320 |
Similar Items
-
A interpretative approach and research of between a whole-class discourse and construction of scientific knowledge in a classroom
by: Wu Kuo-hua, et al.
Published: (2001) -
Argumentation in socio-scientific discussions
by: Mírian Rejane Magalhães Mendes, et al.
Published: (2013-12-01) -
Interactional patterns in argumentation discussions: Teacher and student roles in the construction and refinement of scientific arguments
by: González-Howard, María
Published: (2017) -
Argument, Counterargument, and Integration? Patterns of Argument Reappraisal in Controversial Classroom Discussions
by: Dorothee Gronostay
Published: (2016-06-01) -
Argument, Counterargument, and Integration? Patterns of Argument Reappraisal in Controversial Classroom Discussions
by: Dorothee Gronostay
Published: (2016-06-01)