以適性化教材實現動態評量之研究

碩士 === 國立台北師範學院 === 數理教育研究所 === 92 === The two-tier multiple choice instrument is commonly used as conception diagnostic tools little by little, and the application domain of Dynamic Assessment(DA) is extending from special-education to general-education. The process of this study is to a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: 江銘中
Other Authors: 劉遠楨
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2004
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/52614471595811549712
Description
Summary:碩士 === 國立台北師範學院 === 數理教育研究所 === 92 === The two-tier multiple choice instrument is commonly used as conception diagnostic tools little by little, and the application domain of Dynamic Assessment(DA) is extending from special-education to general-education. The process of this study is to adopt the Computerized Two-Tier Multiple Choice Instrument (CTTMCI) as pre-test tool. To combine CTTMCI with the standardized graduate prompting mode of DA, the propose is stimulating a teacher to heckle the student’s concept-cognition situation individually, and according the misconceptions to arrange individualized remedial instruction. The process of this study is designed with the nonequivalent-control group design model. The teaching materials is setting in the fraction for five-grade of primary school. After collected many reserches about fraction misconceptions, to organize a two-tier multiple choice examination paper. The purpose is to proof the effectiveness of that CTTMCI to be adopted as conception diagnose tool. The experiment was designed into four group: one-tier controling group(OTCG),two-tier controling group(TTCG), one-tier experimenting group(OTEG), and two-tier experimenting group(TTEG). The specimen is comes from three primary school in Taipei County, there are 176 five-grade primary school pupil, is assigned into four group randomly. After analyzing the experiment data , we found: (1) The results of fraction conception post-testing of experimenting group is better than controlled group, and there are significant difference between them. (2) The results of fraction conception post-testing of TTCG is better than OTCG, and there are significant difference between them. (3) The results of fraction conception post-testing of TTEG is better than OTEG, and there are significant difference between them. Summary, in the same condition, the two-tier multiple choice instrument can differentiate the student’s misconception more than one-tier multiple choice instrument.