The Model Building of Perceived Service Quality-- The Empirical study on LISREL Analysis

碩士 === 中原大學 === 企業管理研究所 === 90 === Service quality is the key factor for gaining competitive advantage for modern companies. Since the SERVQUAL scale was developed by Parasuraman, Zeithaml and Berry(1985, 1988), the construct and measure of conceptual model of perceived service quality have become t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: En-Fu Wang, 王恩福
Other Authors: Horngder Lee
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2002
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/35767070418760264983
Description
Summary:碩士 === 中原大學 === 企業管理研究所 === 90 === Service quality is the key factor for gaining competitive advantage for modern companies. Since the SERVQUAL scale was developed by Parasuraman, Zeithaml and Berry(1985, 1988), the construct and measure of conceptual model of perceived service quality have become the most debated issue. Throughout published literatures, it suggests that service quality is a multidimensional, hierarchical construct. From this point of view, this dissertation is based on the service quality perceived by customer, using Brady’s(1997)model, and Dabholkar, Thrope, and Rentz(1996), Rust and Oliver’s(1994)methodology, applying LISREL to examine different dimensions in the hierarchical model. The research model is tested across four service industries in Taiwan(hair salon / fast food, dry cleaning / photo developing, entertainment, bank). Furthermore, 800 customers in targeted industry with age 20 or over were surveyed. 769 valid responses were collected and analyzed by LISREL model. The conclusion of this research are summarized as following: 1. The service quality perceived by customers could be explained by the multidimensional, hierarchical construct. 2. Service quality consists of interaction quality, physical environment quality, and outcome quality. 3. Factors affecting interaction quality are service provider’s attitude, behavior and expertise, in which behavior has stronger effect. 4. Atmosphere and design will affect the physical environment quality significantly; the invisible atmosphere in service encounter has stronger effect. 5. Tangibles and value will affect the outcome quality, and the tangible element in service outcome has stronger effect.