On Understanding of Multiplicative Identites in Junior Secondary Students.

碩士 === 國立彰化師範大學 === 科學教育研究所 === 83 === It is to explore junior secondary students''''understanding of mul- tiplicative identities,especially when the students fall short of competence inmathematics.The attempt is to answer the followin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sheng-Ho Chang, 張勝和
Other Authors: Sou-Yung Chiu
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 1995
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/27007810703477574400
id ndltd-TW-083NCUE0231009
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-083NCUE02310092015-10-13T12:47:24Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/27007810703477574400 On Understanding of Multiplicative Identites in Junior Secondary Students. 乘法公式理解之研究-以國中生為例 Sheng-Ho Chang 張勝和 碩士 國立彰化師範大學 科學教育研究所 83 It is to explore junior secondary students''''understanding of mul- tiplicative identities,especially when the students fall short of competence inmathematics.The attempt is to answer the following three questions:1.What are students''''errors in solving problems of multiplicative identities and the related mathematical tasks? 2. How do students achieve conceptual change about multiplicative identities and related mathematical knowledge? 3.How to probe into suitable remedial instruction? Qualitative method is used in data collection and analyses, including one-to-one interview and field-note-taking,video and audio taping while students solve problems.Protocols are made afterwards and analyzed.It''''s found : 1.Students often commit systematic errors.(1)Answers are impro- perly expressed,such as: X+X=X^2, X.X=2.X.(2).Meanings of operations are confused,or, coefficients and exponents are mis- placed,such as:X+X=X^2; X^2+ X=X^3.(3)False analogy or mal- generalization,such as:(ab)^2= a^2 b^2 implies (a+b)^2=a^2+b^2. (4)Misconception of"common factors",such as:3X.3X=(3.3)X=9X (X as common factor),or 3X.3 X=3(X.X)=3X^2(3 as common factor) (5)False composite of different terms or the coefficients of different terms,such as:4+3N=7N. 2.Misconceptions are robust to change.Basing on prior knowledge and encountering cognitive conflicts,students may produce conceptual change.Through numerical substitutions or geometric diagrams,students appreciate the meanings of letters and algebraic expressions and visualize the missing terms and imcomposables in the alleged contradictions. To sum up,it is necessary to provide familiar problem situations and to shed light on students''''prior knowledge in the remedial remedial instruction . More research waits to be headed on how to make students aware of the founding princples of algebra through analogical reasoning. Sou-Yung Chiu 邱守榕 1995 學位論文 ; thesis 193 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立彰化師範大學 === 科學教育研究所 === 83 === It is to explore junior secondary students''''understanding of mul- tiplicative identities,especially when the students fall short of competence inmathematics.The attempt is to answer the following three questions:1.What are students''''errors in solving problems of multiplicative identities and the related mathematical tasks? 2. How do students achieve conceptual change about multiplicative identities and related mathematical knowledge? 3.How to probe into suitable remedial instruction? Qualitative method is used in data collection and analyses, including one-to-one interview and field-note-taking,video and audio taping while students solve problems.Protocols are made afterwards and analyzed.It''''s found : 1.Students often commit systematic errors.(1)Answers are impro- perly expressed,such as: X+X=X^2, X.X=2.X.(2).Meanings of operations are confused,or, coefficients and exponents are mis- placed,such as:X+X=X^2; X^2+ X=X^3.(3)False analogy or mal- generalization,such as:(ab)^2= a^2 b^2 implies (a+b)^2=a^2+b^2. (4)Misconception of"common factors",such as:3X.3X=(3.3)X=9X (X as common factor),or 3X.3 X=3(X.X)=3X^2(3 as common factor) (5)False composite of different terms or the coefficients of different terms,such as:4+3N=7N. 2.Misconceptions are robust to change.Basing on prior knowledge and encountering cognitive conflicts,students may produce conceptual change.Through numerical substitutions or geometric diagrams,students appreciate the meanings of letters and algebraic expressions and visualize the missing terms and imcomposables in the alleged contradictions. To sum up,it is necessary to provide familiar problem situations and to shed light on students''''prior knowledge in the remedial remedial instruction . More research waits to be headed on how to make students aware of the founding princples of algebra through analogical reasoning.
author2 Sou-Yung Chiu
author_facet Sou-Yung Chiu
Sheng-Ho Chang
張勝和
author Sheng-Ho Chang
張勝和
spellingShingle Sheng-Ho Chang
張勝和
On Understanding of Multiplicative Identites in Junior Secondary Students.
author_sort Sheng-Ho Chang
title On Understanding of Multiplicative Identites in Junior Secondary Students.
title_short On Understanding of Multiplicative Identites in Junior Secondary Students.
title_full On Understanding of Multiplicative Identites in Junior Secondary Students.
title_fullStr On Understanding of Multiplicative Identites in Junior Secondary Students.
title_full_unstemmed On Understanding of Multiplicative Identites in Junior Secondary Students.
title_sort on understanding of multiplicative identites in junior secondary students.
publishDate 1995
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/27007810703477574400
work_keys_str_mv AT shenghochang onunderstandingofmultiplicativeidentitesinjuniorsecondarystudents
AT zhāngshènghé onunderstandingofmultiplicativeidentitesinjuniorsecondarystudents
AT shenghochang chéngfǎgōngshìlǐjiězhīyánjiūyǐguózhōngshēngwèilì
AT zhāngshènghé chéngfǎgōngshìlǐjiězhīyánjiūyǐguózhōngshēngwèilì
_version_ 1716866232305582080