On Understanding of Multiplicative Identites in Junior Secondary Students.
碩士 === 國立彰化師範大學 === 科學教育研究所 === 83 === It is to explore junior secondary students''''understanding of mul- tiplicative identities,especially when the students fall short of competence inmathematics.The attempt is to answer the followin...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
1995
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/27007810703477574400 |
id |
ndltd-TW-083NCUE0231009 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-083NCUE02310092015-10-13T12:47:24Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/27007810703477574400 On Understanding of Multiplicative Identites in Junior Secondary Students. 乘法公式理解之研究-以國中生為例 Sheng-Ho Chang 張勝和 碩士 國立彰化師範大學 科學教育研究所 83 It is to explore junior secondary students''''understanding of mul- tiplicative identities,especially when the students fall short of competence inmathematics.The attempt is to answer the following three questions:1.What are students''''errors in solving problems of multiplicative identities and the related mathematical tasks? 2. How do students achieve conceptual change about multiplicative identities and related mathematical knowledge? 3.How to probe into suitable remedial instruction? Qualitative method is used in data collection and analyses, including one-to-one interview and field-note-taking,video and audio taping while students solve problems.Protocols are made afterwards and analyzed.It''''s found : 1.Students often commit systematic errors.(1)Answers are impro- perly expressed,such as: X+X=X^2, X.X=2.X.(2).Meanings of operations are confused,or, coefficients and exponents are mis- placed,such as:X+X=X^2; X^2+ X=X^3.(3)False analogy or mal- generalization,such as:(ab)^2= a^2 b^2 implies (a+b)^2=a^2+b^2. (4)Misconception of"common factors",such as:3X.3X=(3.3)X=9X (X as common factor),or 3X.3 X=3(X.X)=3X^2(3 as common factor) (5)False composite of different terms or the coefficients of different terms,such as:4+3N=7N. 2.Misconceptions are robust to change.Basing on prior knowledge and encountering cognitive conflicts,students may produce conceptual change.Through numerical substitutions or geometric diagrams,students appreciate the meanings of letters and algebraic expressions and visualize the missing terms and imcomposables in the alleged contradictions. To sum up,it is necessary to provide familiar problem situations and to shed light on students''''prior knowledge in the remedial remedial instruction . More research waits to be headed on how to make students aware of the founding princples of algebra through analogical reasoning. Sou-Yung Chiu 邱守榕 1995 學位論文 ; thesis 193 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立彰化師範大學 === 科學教育研究所 === 83 === It is to explore junior secondary students''''understanding of
mul- tiplicative identities,especially when the students fall
short of competence inmathematics.The attempt is to answer the
following three questions:1.What are students''''errors in solving
problems of multiplicative identities and the related
mathematical tasks? 2. How do students achieve conceptual
change about multiplicative identities and related mathematical
knowledge? 3.How to probe into suitable remedial instruction?
Qualitative method is used in data collection and analyses,
including one-to-one interview and field-note-taking,video and
audio taping while students solve problems.Protocols are made
afterwards and analyzed.It''''s found : 1.Students often commit
systematic errors.(1)Answers are impro- perly expressed,such as:
X+X=X^2, X.X=2.X.(2).Meanings of operations are confused,or,
coefficients and exponents are mis- placed,such as:X+X=X^2; X^2+
X=X^3.(3)False analogy or mal- generalization,such as:(ab)^2=
a^2 b^2 implies (a+b)^2=a^2+b^2. (4)Misconception of"common
factors",such as:3X.3X=(3.3)X=9X (X as common factor),or 3X.3
X=3(X.X)=3X^2(3 as common factor) (5)False composite of
different terms or the coefficients of different terms,such
as:4+3N=7N. 2.Misconceptions are robust to change.Basing on
prior knowledge and encountering cognitive conflicts,students
may produce conceptual change.Through numerical substitutions
or geometric diagrams,students appreciate the meanings of
letters and algebraic expressions and visualize the missing
terms and imcomposables in the alleged contradictions. To sum
up,it is necessary to provide familiar problem situations and
to shed light on students''''prior knowledge in the remedial
remedial instruction . More research waits to be headed on
how to make students aware of the founding princples of
algebra through analogical reasoning.
|
author2 |
Sou-Yung Chiu |
author_facet |
Sou-Yung Chiu Sheng-Ho Chang 張勝和 |
author |
Sheng-Ho Chang 張勝和 |
spellingShingle |
Sheng-Ho Chang 張勝和 On Understanding of Multiplicative Identites in Junior Secondary Students. |
author_sort |
Sheng-Ho Chang |
title |
On Understanding of Multiplicative Identites in Junior Secondary Students. |
title_short |
On Understanding of Multiplicative Identites in Junior Secondary Students. |
title_full |
On Understanding of Multiplicative Identites in Junior Secondary Students. |
title_fullStr |
On Understanding of Multiplicative Identites in Junior Secondary Students. |
title_full_unstemmed |
On Understanding of Multiplicative Identites in Junior Secondary Students. |
title_sort |
on understanding of multiplicative identites in junior secondary students. |
publishDate |
1995 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/27007810703477574400 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT shenghochang onunderstandingofmultiplicativeidentitesinjuniorsecondarystudents AT zhāngshènghé onunderstandingofmultiplicativeidentitesinjuniorsecondarystudents AT shenghochang chéngfǎgōngshìlǐjiězhīyánjiūyǐguózhōngshēngwèilì AT zhāngshènghé chéngfǎgōngshìlǐjiězhīyánjiūyǐguózhōngshēngwèilì |
_version_ |
1716866232305582080 |