A Mixed Method Study Examining Corrective Reading Implementation Models in an Urban Midwest School District

<p> In this mixed methods study, the researcher analyzed three school years of third through fifth-grade students&rsquo; reading scores on the NWEA MAP reading test to determine possible differences in students&rsquo; reading growth relative to the instructional delivery model used to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vaughn, Claudette Denean
Language:EN
Published: Lindenwood University 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10976534
id ndltd-PROQUEST-oai-pqdtoai.proquest.com-10976534
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-PROQUEST-oai-pqdtoai.proquest.com-109765342018-11-15T16:12:02Z A Mixed Method Study Examining Corrective Reading Implementation Models in an Urban Midwest School District Vaughn, Claudette Denean Educational evaluation|Elementary education|Reading instruction <p> In this mixed methods study, the researcher analyzed three school years of third through fifth-grade students&rsquo; reading scores on the NWEA MAP reading test to determine possible differences in students&rsquo; reading growth relative to the instructional delivery model used to provide Corrective Reading as supplemental reading intervention. Students received Corrective Reading intervention with the classroom teacher, the after-school teacher (both large groups), or in small-groups with the Title I Reading Teacher. </p><p> Five elementary school principals and 15 teachers answered interview questions related to experiences with Corrective Reading, perceptions of student academic and behavioral outcomes, and perceptions of the three instructional delivery models. Teachers and principals agreed Corrective Reading improved students&rsquo; academic and behavioral outcomes. Classroom and after-school teachers believed students demonstrated greater reading growth in small groups. Title I Reading Teachers agreed, but desired the ability to show academic gains with a larger number of students. </p><p> The researcher conducted an Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test on reading growth scores from the three groups. The <i>p</i>-value of 0.0026 indicated a significant difference among the means, so the researcher rejected the null hypothesis. Students in all the reading intervention groups showed some reading growth. However, both the Tukey and Scheffe post hoc analyses revealed the mean of the Title I Reading Teacher group was significantly higher than the mean of the after-school group. As a result of the findings, the researcher recommends educational leaders staff buildings with reading intervention specialists to provide small-group intervention to struggling readers.</p><p> Lindenwood University 2018-11-14 00:00:00.0 thesis http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10976534 EN
collection NDLTD
language EN
sources NDLTD
topic Educational evaluation|Elementary education|Reading instruction
spellingShingle Educational evaluation|Elementary education|Reading instruction
Vaughn, Claudette Denean
A Mixed Method Study Examining Corrective Reading Implementation Models in an Urban Midwest School District
description <p> In this mixed methods study, the researcher analyzed three school years of third through fifth-grade students&rsquo; reading scores on the NWEA MAP reading test to determine possible differences in students&rsquo; reading growth relative to the instructional delivery model used to provide Corrective Reading as supplemental reading intervention. Students received Corrective Reading intervention with the classroom teacher, the after-school teacher (both large groups), or in small-groups with the Title I Reading Teacher. </p><p> Five elementary school principals and 15 teachers answered interview questions related to experiences with Corrective Reading, perceptions of student academic and behavioral outcomes, and perceptions of the three instructional delivery models. Teachers and principals agreed Corrective Reading improved students&rsquo; academic and behavioral outcomes. Classroom and after-school teachers believed students demonstrated greater reading growth in small groups. Title I Reading Teachers agreed, but desired the ability to show academic gains with a larger number of students. </p><p> The researcher conducted an Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test on reading growth scores from the three groups. The <i>p</i>-value of 0.0026 indicated a significant difference among the means, so the researcher rejected the null hypothesis. Students in all the reading intervention groups showed some reading growth. However, both the Tukey and Scheffe post hoc analyses revealed the mean of the Title I Reading Teacher group was significantly higher than the mean of the after-school group. As a result of the findings, the researcher recommends educational leaders staff buildings with reading intervention specialists to provide small-group intervention to struggling readers.</p><p>
author Vaughn, Claudette Denean
author_facet Vaughn, Claudette Denean
author_sort Vaughn, Claudette Denean
title A Mixed Method Study Examining Corrective Reading Implementation Models in an Urban Midwest School District
title_short A Mixed Method Study Examining Corrective Reading Implementation Models in an Urban Midwest School District
title_full A Mixed Method Study Examining Corrective Reading Implementation Models in an Urban Midwest School District
title_fullStr A Mixed Method Study Examining Corrective Reading Implementation Models in an Urban Midwest School District
title_full_unstemmed A Mixed Method Study Examining Corrective Reading Implementation Models in an Urban Midwest School District
title_sort mixed method study examining corrective reading implementation models in an urban midwest school district
publisher Lindenwood University
publishDate 2018
url http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10976534
work_keys_str_mv AT vaughnclaudettedenean amixedmethodstudyexaminingcorrectivereadingimplementationmodelsinanurbanmidwestschooldistrict
AT vaughnclaudettedenean mixedmethodstudyexaminingcorrectivereadingimplementationmodelsinanurbanmidwestschooldistrict
_version_ 1718790964702609408