Promoting progress : a rhetorical analysis of college and university sexual harassment codes

This thesis is a rhetorical analysis of sexual harassment codes on college and university campuses. The situational model proposed by Lloyd Bitzer is used to examine representative artifacts from Rice University in Houston, Texas, and Oregon State University in Corvallis, Oregon, so as to determine...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Porrovecchio, Mark J.
Other Authors: Knapp, Trischa
Language:en_US
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1957/34265
id ndltd-ORGSU-oai-ir.library.oregonstate.edu-1957-34265
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-ORGSU-oai-ir.library.oregonstate.edu-1957-342652012-10-10T03:17:50ZPromoting progress : a rhetorical analysis of college and university sexual harassment codesPorrovecchio, Mark J.Rice University -- AdministrationOregon State University -- AdministrationSexual harassment in universities and colleges -- Texas -- HoustonSexual harassment in universities and colleges -- Oregon -- CorvallisCollege discipline -- Texas -- HoustonCollege discipline -- Oregon -- CorvallisThis thesis is a rhetorical analysis of sexual harassment codes on college and university campuses. The situational model proposed by Lloyd Bitzer is used to examine representative artifacts from Rice University in Houston, Texas, and Oregon State University in Corvallis, Oregon, so as to determine whether they operate as "fitting" rhetorical responses to the situation generally and the exigence of sexual harassment specifically. The body of this analysis develops in eight stages: an introductory discussion of sexual harassment and research conducted thereon; examination of codes as ethical and situational constructs; explication of the rhetorical framework; the nature of the exigence as a historical and campus-specific imperfection; examination of the publics that create the rhetorical audience; the inartistic and artistic constraints operative within the rhetorical situation; an analysis of the two codes; and summary comments and recommendations. Within the last two sections the determinations are made that: 1) the codes do not currently function as a "fitting" response to the situation/exigence, and that 2) revisions can be made so as to promote a more pragmatic and "fitting" response to sexual harassment.Graduation date: 1997Knapp, Trischa2012-10-09T17:23:17Z2012-10-09T17:23:17Z1997-05-021997-05-02Thesis/Dissertationhttp://hdl.handle.net/1957/34265en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
sources NDLTD
topic Rice University -- Administration
Oregon State University -- Administration
Sexual harassment in universities and colleges -- Texas -- Houston
Sexual harassment in universities and colleges -- Oregon -- Corvallis
College discipline -- Texas -- Houston
College discipline -- Oregon -- Corvallis
spellingShingle Rice University -- Administration
Oregon State University -- Administration
Sexual harassment in universities and colleges -- Texas -- Houston
Sexual harassment in universities and colleges -- Oregon -- Corvallis
College discipline -- Texas -- Houston
College discipline -- Oregon -- Corvallis
Porrovecchio, Mark J.
Promoting progress : a rhetorical analysis of college and university sexual harassment codes
description This thesis is a rhetorical analysis of sexual harassment codes on college and university campuses. The situational model proposed by Lloyd Bitzer is used to examine representative artifacts from Rice University in Houston, Texas, and Oregon State University in Corvallis, Oregon, so as to determine whether they operate as "fitting" rhetorical responses to the situation generally and the exigence of sexual harassment specifically. The body of this analysis develops in eight stages: an introductory discussion of sexual harassment and research conducted thereon; examination of codes as ethical and situational constructs; explication of the rhetorical framework; the nature of the exigence as a historical and campus-specific imperfection; examination of the publics that create the rhetorical audience; the inartistic and artistic constraints operative within the rhetorical situation; an analysis of the two codes; and summary comments and recommendations. Within the last two sections the determinations are made that: 1) the codes do not currently function as a "fitting" response to the situation/exigence, and that 2) revisions can be made so as to promote a more pragmatic and "fitting" response to sexual harassment. === Graduation date: 1997
author2 Knapp, Trischa
author_facet Knapp, Trischa
Porrovecchio, Mark J.
author Porrovecchio, Mark J.
author_sort Porrovecchio, Mark J.
title Promoting progress : a rhetorical analysis of college and university sexual harassment codes
title_short Promoting progress : a rhetorical analysis of college and university sexual harassment codes
title_full Promoting progress : a rhetorical analysis of college and university sexual harassment codes
title_fullStr Promoting progress : a rhetorical analysis of college and university sexual harassment codes
title_full_unstemmed Promoting progress : a rhetorical analysis of college and university sexual harassment codes
title_sort promoting progress : a rhetorical analysis of college and university sexual harassment codes
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/1957/34265
work_keys_str_mv AT porrovecchiomarkj promotingprogressarhetoricalanalysisofcollegeanduniversitysexualharassmentcodes
_version_ 1716393288462761984