Promoting progress : a rhetorical analysis of college and university sexual harassment codes
This thesis is a rhetorical analysis of sexual harassment codes on college and university campuses. The situational model proposed by Lloyd Bitzer is used to examine representative artifacts from Rice University in Houston, Texas, and Oregon State University in Corvallis, Oregon, so as to determine...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1957/34265 |
id |
ndltd-ORGSU-oai-ir.library.oregonstate.edu-1957-34265 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-ORGSU-oai-ir.library.oregonstate.edu-1957-342652012-10-10T03:17:50ZPromoting progress : a rhetorical analysis of college and university sexual harassment codesPorrovecchio, Mark J.Rice University -- AdministrationOregon State University -- AdministrationSexual harassment in universities and colleges -- Texas -- HoustonSexual harassment in universities and colleges -- Oregon -- CorvallisCollege discipline -- Texas -- HoustonCollege discipline -- Oregon -- CorvallisThis thesis is a rhetorical analysis of sexual harassment codes on college and university campuses. The situational model proposed by Lloyd Bitzer is used to examine representative artifacts from Rice University in Houston, Texas, and Oregon State University in Corvallis, Oregon, so as to determine whether they operate as "fitting" rhetorical responses to the situation generally and the exigence of sexual harassment specifically. The body of this analysis develops in eight stages: an introductory discussion of sexual harassment and research conducted thereon; examination of codes as ethical and situational constructs; explication of the rhetorical framework; the nature of the exigence as a historical and campus-specific imperfection; examination of the publics that create the rhetorical audience; the inartistic and artistic constraints operative within the rhetorical situation; an analysis of the two codes; and summary comments and recommendations. Within the last two sections the determinations are made that: 1) the codes do not currently function as a "fitting" response to the situation/exigence, and that 2) revisions can be made so as to promote a more pragmatic and "fitting" response to sexual harassment.Graduation date: 1997Knapp, Trischa2012-10-09T17:23:17Z2012-10-09T17:23:17Z1997-05-021997-05-02Thesis/Dissertationhttp://hdl.handle.net/1957/34265en_US |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en_US |
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Rice University -- Administration Oregon State University -- Administration Sexual harassment in universities and colleges -- Texas -- Houston Sexual harassment in universities and colleges -- Oregon -- Corvallis College discipline -- Texas -- Houston College discipline -- Oregon -- Corvallis |
spellingShingle |
Rice University -- Administration Oregon State University -- Administration Sexual harassment in universities and colleges -- Texas -- Houston Sexual harassment in universities and colleges -- Oregon -- Corvallis College discipline -- Texas -- Houston College discipline -- Oregon -- Corvallis Porrovecchio, Mark J. Promoting progress : a rhetorical analysis of college and university sexual harassment codes |
description |
This thesis is a rhetorical analysis of sexual harassment codes on college and
university campuses. The situational model proposed by Lloyd Bitzer is used to examine
representative artifacts from Rice University in Houston, Texas, and Oregon State
University in Corvallis, Oregon, so as to determine whether they operate as "fitting"
rhetorical responses to the situation generally and the exigence of sexual harassment
specifically. The body of this analysis develops in eight stages: an introductory discussion
of sexual harassment and research conducted thereon; examination of codes as ethical and
situational constructs; explication of the rhetorical framework; the nature of the exigence
as a historical and campus-specific imperfection; examination of the publics that create the
rhetorical audience; the inartistic and artistic constraints operative within the rhetorical
situation; an analysis of the two codes; and summary comments and recommendations.
Within the last two sections the determinations are made that: 1) the codes do not
currently function as a "fitting" response to the situation/exigence, and that 2) revisions
can be made so as to promote a more pragmatic and "fitting" response to sexual
harassment. === Graduation date: 1997 |
author2 |
Knapp, Trischa |
author_facet |
Knapp, Trischa Porrovecchio, Mark J. |
author |
Porrovecchio, Mark J. |
author_sort |
Porrovecchio, Mark J. |
title |
Promoting progress : a rhetorical analysis of college and university sexual harassment codes |
title_short |
Promoting progress : a rhetorical analysis of college and university sexual harassment codes |
title_full |
Promoting progress : a rhetorical analysis of college and university sexual harassment codes |
title_fullStr |
Promoting progress : a rhetorical analysis of college and university sexual harassment codes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Promoting progress : a rhetorical analysis of college and university sexual harassment codes |
title_sort |
promoting progress : a rhetorical analysis of college and university sexual harassment codes |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/1957/34265 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT porrovecchiomarkj promotingprogressarhetoricalanalysisofcollegeanduniversitysexualharassmentcodes |
_version_ |
1716393288462761984 |