Behavioral responses of elk (Cervus elaphus) to the threat of wolf (Canus lupus) predation

We studied individual and herd level behavioral responses of elk to spatial and temporal variation in the risk of predation by wolves over three winters in the Upper Gallatin drainage, Montana. Within a given drainage, elk of both sexes moved into or closer to protective cover (timber) in response t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Winnie, John Arthur Jr.
Language:en
Published: 2006
Online Access:http://etd.lib.montana.edu/etd/2006/winnie/WinnieJ0506.pdf
id ndltd-MONTSTATE-http---etd.lib.montana.edu-etd-2006-winnie-WinnieJ0506.pdf
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-MONTSTATE-http---etd.lib.montana.edu-etd-2006-winnie-WinnieJ0506.pdf2012-03-09T15:49:06Z Behavioral responses of elk (Cervus elaphus) to the threat of wolf (Canus lupus) predation Winnie, John Arthur Jr. We studied individual and herd level behavioral responses of elk to spatial and temporal variation in the risk of predation by wolves over three winters in the Upper Gallatin drainage, Montana. Within a given drainage, elk of both sexes moved into or closer to protective cover (timber) in response to wolf presence. Cow elk responded to elevated risk by increasing vigilance in exchange for foraging, and large mixed (cow, calf, spike) herds substantially decreased in size. In contrast, when wolves were present, bulls did not increase vigilance levels, nor decrease feeding, and small bull-only groups slightly increased in size. As a consequence, small bull-only herds and large mixed sex herds converged on a similar size when wolves were present. We believe this response is a balancing of the benefits of risk dilution with increased detectability or attractiveness of larger herds to wolves. Based on proportions in the population, wolves overselected bulls and underselected cows as prey. Thus, bulls showed weaker antipredator responses than cows, despite facing a greater risk of predation. Using marrow fat content from elk killed by wolves as an indicator of body condition, bulls were in significantly worse body condition than cows throughout the winter, and condition deteriorated for both sexes as winter progressed. Overall, we conclude that: anti-predator behaviors carry substantial foraging costs; bulls, due to their poorer body condition, are less able to pay these costs than cows; and differences in ability to pay foraging costs likely explain sex specific differences in anti-predator behaviors. 2006-05-15 Dissertation Montana State University en http://etd.lib.montana.edu/etd/2006/winnie/WinnieJ0506.pdf
collection NDLTD
language en
sources NDLTD
description We studied individual and herd level behavioral responses of elk to spatial and temporal variation in the risk of predation by wolves over three winters in the Upper Gallatin drainage, Montana. Within a given drainage, elk of both sexes moved into or closer to protective cover (timber) in response to wolf presence. Cow elk responded to elevated risk by increasing vigilance in exchange for foraging, and large mixed (cow, calf, spike) herds substantially decreased in size. In contrast, when wolves were present, bulls did not increase vigilance levels, nor decrease feeding, and small bull-only groups slightly increased in size. As a consequence, small bull-only herds and large mixed sex herds converged on a similar size when wolves were present. We believe this response is a balancing of the benefits of risk dilution with increased detectability or attractiveness of larger herds to wolves. Based on proportions in the population, wolves overselected bulls and underselected cows as prey. Thus, bulls showed weaker antipredator responses than cows, despite facing a greater risk of predation. Using marrow fat content from elk killed by wolves as an indicator of body condition, bulls were in significantly worse body condition than cows throughout the winter, and condition deteriorated for both sexes as winter progressed. Overall, we conclude that: anti-predator behaviors carry substantial foraging costs; bulls, due to their poorer body condition, are less able to pay these costs than cows; and differences in ability to pay foraging costs likely explain sex specific differences in anti-predator behaviors.
author Winnie, John Arthur Jr.
spellingShingle Winnie, John Arthur Jr.
Behavioral responses of elk (Cervus elaphus) to the threat of wolf (Canus lupus) predation
author_facet Winnie, John Arthur Jr.
author_sort Winnie, John Arthur Jr.
title Behavioral responses of elk (Cervus elaphus) to the threat of wolf (Canus lupus) predation
title_short Behavioral responses of elk (Cervus elaphus) to the threat of wolf (Canus lupus) predation
title_full Behavioral responses of elk (Cervus elaphus) to the threat of wolf (Canus lupus) predation
title_fullStr Behavioral responses of elk (Cervus elaphus) to the threat of wolf (Canus lupus) predation
title_full_unstemmed Behavioral responses of elk (Cervus elaphus) to the threat of wolf (Canus lupus) predation
title_sort behavioral responses of elk (cervus elaphus) to the threat of wolf (canus lupus) predation
publishDate 2006
url http://etd.lib.montana.edu/etd/2006/winnie/WinnieJ0506.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT winniejohnarthurjr behavioralresponsesofelkcervuselaphustothethreatofwolfcanuslupuspredation
_version_ 1716390282669326336