Teacher Matters: Teacher Normative Influence and Student Persistence in College

This dissertation extends the work on teacher immediacy (TI) and student persistence by using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) (Ajzen, 1985) to account for variability in college student persistence. Students provided perceptions of their teachers immediacy behaviors using modified versions of G...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Denham, Jonathan Paul
Other Authors: Bodie, Graham
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: LSU 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-07142014-135910/
id ndltd-LSU-oai-etd.lsu.edu-etd-07142014-135910
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LSU-oai-etd.lsu.edu-etd-07142014-1359102014-07-31T03:50:30Z Teacher Matters: Teacher Normative Influence and Student Persistence in College Denham, Jonathan Paul Communication Studies This dissertation extends the work on teacher immediacy (TI) and student persistence by using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) (Ajzen, 1985) to account for variability in college student persistence. Students provided perceptions of their teachers immediacy behaviors using modified versions of Gorhams (1988) TI scale. Instruction prompts of the TI scale were manipulated to create four conditions. The results from Study 1 demonstrate that TI scale prompt language has an effect on the ways participants assess their teachers immediacy behaviors. The results from Study 2 show that student perceptions of their teachers immediacy behaviors change over the course of an academic semester, such that TI is statistically higher at the end of the semester than at the beginning, as measured by collecting data at four time points. The results from both studies generally support the hypotheses and suggest the TPB accurately predicts college student persistence. However, it is unclear how TI is influencing the overall TPB structural model. In some cases, adding TI to the TPB structural models resulted in a poorer fitting model. Discussions, limitations, and future research are provided for both studies. Bodie, Graham Edwards, Renee Garand, James Bourke, Brian LSU 2014-07-30 text application/pdf http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-07142014-135910/ http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-07142014-135910/ en unrestricted I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached herein a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to LSU or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below and in appropriate University policies, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Communication Studies
spellingShingle Communication Studies
Denham, Jonathan Paul
Teacher Matters: Teacher Normative Influence and Student Persistence in College
description This dissertation extends the work on teacher immediacy (TI) and student persistence by using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) (Ajzen, 1985) to account for variability in college student persistence. Students provided perceptions of their teachers immediacy behaviors using modified versions of Gorhams (1988) TI scale. Instruction prompts of the TI scale were manipulated to create four conditions. The results from Study 1 demonstrate that TI scale prompt language has an effect on the ways participants assess their teachers immediacy behaviors. The results from Study 2 show that student perceptions of their teachers immediacy behaviors change over the course of an academic semester, such that TI is statistically higher at the end of the semester than at the beginning, as measured by collecting data at four time points. The results from both studies generally support the hypotheses and suggest the TPB accurately predicts college student persistence. However, it is unclear how TI is influencing the overall TPB structural model. In some cases, adding TI to the TPB structural models resulted in a poorer fitting model. Discussions, limitations, and future research are provided for both studies.
author2 Bodie, Graham
author_facet Bodie, Graham
Denham, Jonathan Paul
author Denham, Jonathan Paul
author_sort Denham, Jonathan Paul
title Teacher Matters: Teacher Normative Influence and Student Persistence in College
title_short Teacher Matters: Teacher Normative Influence and Student Persistence in College
title_full Teacher Matters: Teacher Normative Influence and Student Persistence in College
title_fullStr Teacher Matters: Teacher Normative Influence and Student Persistence in College
title_full_unstemmed Teacher Matters: Teacher Normative Influence and Student Persistence in College
title_sort teacher matters: teacher normative influence and student persistence in college
publisher LSU
publishDate 2014
url http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-07142014-135910/
work_keys_str_mv AT denhamjonathanpaul teachermattersteachernormativeinfluenceandstudentpersistenceincollege
_version_ 1716709774702149632