Analysis of proctor feedback accuracy in a computer-aided personalized system of instruction
Information stored in computer files was analyzed to assess proctor feedback accuracy in a Computer-Aided Personalized System of Instruction. The effect of feedback on subsequent student responses to test questions also was assessed. Participants were students who in the Fall of 1996 completed an u...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
2007
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1993/2320 |
id |
ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-MWU.1993-2320 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-MWU.1993-23202014-03-29T03:42:06Z Analysis of proctor feedback accuracy in a computer-aided personalized system of instruction Martin, Toby Information stored in computer files was analyzed to assess proctor feedback accuracy in a Computer-Aided Personalized System of Instruction. The effect of feedback on subsequent student responses to test questions also was assessed. Participants were students who in the Fall of 1996 completed an undergraduate psychology course at the University of Manitoba. Participants had no contact with the researcher; instead, records of past student-proctor interactions were examined. Overall proctor accuracy was 72.6%. However, accuracy dropped to 36.0% when proctors graded incorrect answers. Students complied at least partially with 61.3% of all instances of feedback; this value changed little as a function of feedback importance. 2007-06-01T19:21:01Z 2007-06-01T19:21:01Z 2000-05-01T00:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/1993/2320 en_US |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en_US |
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
Information stored in computer files was analyzed to assess proctor feedback accuracy in a Computer-Aided Personalized System of Instruction. The effect of feedback on subsequent student responses to test questions also was assessed. Participants were students who in the Fall of 1996 completed an undergraduate psychology course at the University of Manitoba. Participants had no contact with the researcher; instead, records of past student-proctor interactions were examined. Overall proctor accuracy was 72.6%. However, accuracy dropped to 36.0% when proctors graded incorrect answers. Students complied at least partially with 61.3% of all instances of feedback; this value changed little as a function of feedback importance. |
author |
Martin, Toby |
spellingShingle |
Martin, Toby Analysis of proctor feedback accuracy in a computer-aided personalized system of instruction |
author_facet |
Martin, Toby |
author_sort |
Martin, Toby |
title |
Analysis of proctor feedback accuracy in a computer-aided personalized system of instruction |
title_short |
Analysis of proctor feedback accuracy in a computer-aided personalized system of instruction |
title_full |
Analysis of proctor feedback accuracy in a computer-aided personalized system of instruction |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of proctor feedback accuracy in a computer-aided personalized system of instruction |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of proctor feedback accuracy in a computer-aided personalized system of instruction |
title_sort |
analysis of proctor feedback accuracy in a computer-aided personalized system of instruction |
publishDate |
2007 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/1993/2320 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT martintoby analysisofproctorfeedbackaccuracyinacomputeraidedpersonalizedsystemofinstruction |
_version_ |
1716657695781552128 |