An examination of several in-basket scoring strategies and their effect on reliability and criterion-related validity

The in-basket exercise, a paper-and-pencil measure of administrative ability, is an assessment technique characterized by complex, often subjective scoring procedures which have limited wide-scale applications of this popular instrument. Because the literature affords no clear classification system...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Harlos, Karen P.
Language:English
Published: 2008
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/1373
id ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-BVAU.2429-1373
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-BVAU.2429-13732014-03-14T15:37:00Z An examination of several in-basket scoring strategies and their effect on reliability and criterion-related validity Harlos, Karen P. The in-basket exercise, a paper-and-pencil measure of administrative ability, is an assessment technique characterized by complex, often subjective scoring procedures which have limited wide-scale applications of this popular instrument. Because the literature affords no clear classification system for this and related exercises, a structure which clarified the definitions of and relationships among management games, management simulations, work sample tests, and in-basket exercises was introduced. The primary purpose of the present research was to investigate the cross-sample generalizability of several strategies for scoring the in-basket exercise, including a reduced-item scoring approach in which an optimal subset of items was identified for scoring. The preliminary studies upon which the present research is based are also discussed in the present work. In addition to examining the impact of these scoring strategies on reliability and criterion-related validity, consideration was given to addressing long-standing concerns of in-basket training- and scoring time demands. Three hundred and twenty-one entry-level employees from a large western Canadian utility company were administered the same in-basket exercise previously applied in a different Canadian utility company. Contrary to expectations, the shrinkage in validity using an empirically-based scoring key was substantial, pointing to the selection of a more logically-derived panel key as the method of choice. The introduction of a new cognitive-based measure of in-basket performance showed promising results. In addition, the reduced-item scoring approach did not result insignificant losses in reliability or criterion-related validity, thus allowing substantial reductions in training- and scoring-time. Implications for in-basket development are also considered. 2008-08-13T21:40:16Z 2008-08-13T21:40:16Z 1992 2008-08-13T21:40:16Z 1993-05 Electronic Thesis or Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/1373 eng UBC Retrospective Theses Digitization Project [http://www.library.ubc.ca/archives/retro_theses/]
collection NDLTD
language English
sources NDLTD
description The in-basket exercise, a paper-and-pencil measure of administrative ability, is an assessment technique characterized by complex, often subjective scoring procedures which have limited wide-scale applications of this popular instrument. Because the literature affords no clear classification system for this and related exercises, a structure which clarified the definitions of and relationships among management games, management simulations, work sample tests, and in-basket exercises was introduced. The primary purpose of the present research was to investigate the cross-sample generalizability of several strategies for scoring the in-basket exercise, including a reduced-item scoring approach in which an optimal subset of items was identified for scoring. The preliminary studies upon which the present research is based are also discussed in the present work. In addition to examining the impact of these scoring strategies on reliability and criterion-related validity, consideration was given to addressing long-standing concerns of in-basket training- and scoring time demands. Three hundred and twenty-one entry-level employees from a large western Canadian utility company were administered the same in-basket exercise previously applied in a different Canadian utility company. Contrary to expectations, the shrinkage in validity using an empirically-based scoring key was substantial, pointing to the selection of a more logically-derived panel key as the method of choice. The introduction of a new cognitive-based measure of in-basket performance showed promising results. In addition, the reduced-item scoring approach did not result insignificant losses in reliability or criterion-related validity, thus allowing substantial reductions in training- and scoring-time. Implications for in-basket development are also considered.
author Harlos, Karen P.
spellingShingle Harlos, Karen P.
An examination of several in-basket scoring strategies and their effect on reliability and criterion-related validity
author_facet Harlos, Karen P.
author_sort Harlos, Karen P.
title An examination of several in-basket scoring strategies and their effect on reliability and criterion-related validity
title_short An examination of several in-basket scoring strategies and their effect on reliability and criterion-related validity
title_full An examination of several in-basket scoring strategies and their effect on reliability and criterion-related validity
title_fullStr An examination of several in-basket scoring strategies and their effect on reliability and criterion-related validity
title_full_unstemmed An examination of several in-basket scoring strategies and their effect on reliability and criterion-related validity
title_sort examination of several in-basket scoring strategies and their effect on reliability and criterion-related validity
publishDate 2008
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/1373
work_keys_str_mv AT harloskarenp anexaminationofseveralinbasketscoringstrategiesandtheireffectonreliabilityandcriterionrelatedvalidity
AT harloskarenp examinationofseveralinbasketscoringstrategiesandtheireffectonreliabilityandcriterionrelatedvalidity
_version_ 1716649553764024320