A mixed method study of airline brand equity

This research investigates airline brand equity in a sequential, mixed method study. The initial, exploratory study undertaken with the focus groups identified relevant issues that influence airline brand equity. The secondary associations of airline brands are often related to the airlines’ country...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nakaprasit, Ayudh
Other Authors: Mason, Keith
Language:en
Published: Cranfield University 2013
Online Access:http://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/7868
id ndltd-CRANFIELD1-oai-dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk-1826-7868
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-CRANFIELD1-oai-dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk-1826-78682013-04-19T15:26:01ZA mixed method study of airline brand equityNakaprasit, AyudhThis research investigates airline brand equity in a sequential, mixed method study. The initial, exploratory study undertaken with the focus groups identified relevant issues that influence airline brand equity. The secondary associations of airline brands are often related to the airlines’ country of origin and culture or the intangible cues that are used in airline advertisements. These intangible cues and secondary associations play an important role in triggering airline brand awareness and the unique brand value proposition of each airline. The questionnaire-based study shows that the structure of airline brand equity is comprised of three factors. The first factor highlights the importance of airlines being able to provide suitable and innovative products and consistently good service. The second factor is a reflection of the first factor, i.e. airlines that can deliver both suitable tangible products and good services will be able to establish a large base of loyal customers. The third factor highlights the importance of establishing brand awareness. Based on the structure of airline brand equity that was found, there are four clusters of airline passengers with similar airline brand perceptions, namely: ‘Loyal customers’; ‘Asking for consistency customers’; ‘Hard to please customers’; and ‘Difficult to talk to customers’. The determinant attribute analysis shows that the determinant for the choice of airline brand is different. Each airline is different in its branding, products and service strategies. This suggests that the ways in which each airline brand can meet the needs of each group of airline passengers will also be different. This research demonstrates that the structure of airline brand equity for fullservice and low-cost carrier brands is different. For full-service carrier brands, it is the delivery of suitable tangible products and services that encourages loyalty. In contrast, when price is the most influential determinant attribute, it is the low-cost carrier brands’ resources and ability to offer consistently low fares that helps them to establish a large base of repeat customers.Cranfield UniversityMason, Keith2013-03-15T14:32:01Z2013-03-15T14:32:01Z2012-04Thesis or dissertationDoctoralPhDhttp://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/7868en© Cranfield University 2012. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of the copyright owner.
collection NDLTD
language en
sources NDLTD
description This research investigates airline brand equity in a sequential, mixed method study. The initial, exploratory study undertaken with the focus groups identified relevant issues that influence airline brand equity. The secondary associations of airline brands are often related to the airlines’ country of origin and culture or the intangible cues that are used in airline advertisements. These intangible cues and secondary associations play an important role in triggering airline brand awareness and the unique brand value proposition of each airline. The questionnaire-based study shows that the structure of airline brand equity is comprised of three factors. The first factor highlights the importance of airlines being able to provide suitable and innovative products and consistently good service. The second factor is a reflection of the first factor, i.e. airlines that can deliver both suitable tangible products and good services will be able to establish a large base of loyal customers. The third factor highlights the importance of establishing brand awareness. Based on the structure of airline brand equity that was found, there are four clusters of airline passengers with similar airline brand perceptions, namely: ‘Loyal customers’; ‘Asking for consistency customers’; ‘Hard to please customers’; and ‘Difficult to talk to customers’. The determinant attribute analysis shows that the determinant for the choice of airline brand is different. Each airline is different in its branding, products and service strategies. This suggests that the ways in which each airline brand can meet the needs of each group of airline passengers will also be different. This research demonstrates that the structure of airline brand equity for fullservice and low-cost carrier brands is different. For full-service carrier brands, it is the delivery of suitable tangible products and services that encourages loyalty. In contrast, when price is the most influential determinant attribute, it is the low-cost carrier brands’ resources and ability to offer consistently low fares that helps them to establish a large base of repeat customers.
author2 Mason, Keith
author_facet Mason, Keith
Nakaprasit, Ayudh
author Nakaprasit, Ayudh
spellingShingle Nakaprasit, Ayudh
A mixed method study of airline brand equity
author_sort Nakaprasit, Ayudh
title A mixed method study of airline brand equity
title_short A mixed method study of airline brand equity
title_full A mixed method study of airline brand equity
title_fullStr A mixed method study of airline brand equity
title_full_unstemmed A mixed method study of airline brand equity
title_sort mixed method study of airline brand equity
publisher Cranfield University
publishDate 2013
url http://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/7868
work_keys_str_mv AT nakaprasitayudh amixedmethodstudyofairlinebrandequity
AT nakaprasitayudh mixedmethodstudyofairlinebrandequity
_version_ 1716581540440309760