| Summary: | 國人自我贈禮的風氣方興未艾，但在資源的束縛與傳統價值觀的影響下，使得消費者不免陷於困窘之境，而本研究即欲探討消費者自我贈禮與消費罪惡感之間的關係。本研究目的有四：其一，瞭解國人引發自我贈禮的主要背景情境與動機，並試圖對自我贈禮加以分類，以求得主要的背景情境與動機所對應之自我贈禮類型；其二，發展消費罪惡感之構面與發生時機；其三，瞭解不同自我贈禮類型與消費罪惡感的對應關係；其四，探討在不同產品類型的影響之下，自我贈禮與消費罪惡感的對應關係是否有所不同。
本研究以關鍵事件法設計問卷，透過三次前測得到正式問卷，針對60位消費者進行訪談及問卷施測，共收集了60個自我贈禮事件。經資料分析過後，得到研究結果可歸納成四大方向：
首先在自我贈禮方面，背景情境按發生頻次多寡依序為：發生重大事件、有成就感、工作辛苦、壓力負荷、心情低落、有額外資源、週期性自我回饋；背景情境與動機之間呈現一對一的關係，分別是為了留下紀念、犒賞自己、慰勞自己、抒解壓力、愉悅自己、維持好心情、對自己好一點。另外，若依照產品導向程度的強弱以及資訊準備程度的高低針對自我贈禮進行分類，國人進行最不常發生的自我贈禮類型為「高度產品導向—低度資訊準備」—驚鴻一瞥型。
其次在消費罪惡感方面，其構面為猶豫感、金錢疼惜感、愧疚感，時機為購買之前的預期性罪惡感，購買當下的進行性罪惡感，以及購買之後的反應性罪惡感，而雖然各時機都會有各構面的成分，但預期性罪惡感最主要的構面為猶豫感，進行性罪惡感最主要的構面為疼惜感，反應性罪惡感最主要的構面為愧疚感。
接著在自我贈禮與消費罪惡感之關係方面，當消費者進行週期性自我回饋時，會感受到程度最高的預期性罪惡感；而當消費者因有成就感或心情低落時所進行之自我贈禮，其感受到的是程度最低的預期性罪惡感。至於，若是屬於高度產品導向類型者，其表現在消費罪惡感上的類型最主要為財務類罪惡感；若是屬於低度產品導向類型者，比較有可能不會產生消費罪惡感。
最後，若是受到不同產品類型影響的情況下，由於自我贈禮之禮物類型皆為奢侈品，因此以功能型與享樂型產品做為產品分類的標準。對於購買功能型奢侈品做為自我贈禮禮物的消費者而言，無論是高度產品導向或是低度產品導向類型者，其表現在消費罪惡感上，最主要的類型為財務類罪惡感；對於購買享樂型奢侈品做為自我贈禮禮物的消費者而言，若是高度產品導向類型者，其表現在消費罪惡感上，最主要的類型為財務類罪惡感；若是低度產品導向者，則傾向完全沒有罪惡感。
整體而言，本研究不僅為國人自我贈禮的背景情境與動機之先導研究，亦開啟了消費罪惡感研究之先河，並建立消費罪惡感的構面與時機，著實為後續研究奠定了相當的基礎。
=== People in Taiwan have tended to buy themselves gifts recently. However, under the constraints of resources and the influence of traditional values, they would hesitate to buy or not to buy. This study focuses on this interesting theme-the relationship between consumers’ self-gift giving and consumer guilt. The objectives of this study are to explore consumers’ motivations of self-gifts, the dimensions and evolution of consumer guilt, and the relationship between consumers’ self-gift giving and consumer guilt. Product categories are also under the consideration of this study to examine the effects of different products on the relationship between consumers’ self-gift giving and consumer guilt.
This research employed the critical incident techniques. A questionnaire was first designed and pre-tested three times before the main field work. Through collecting, sorting and analyzing 60 self-gift giving events, the results pointed out four main parts as followed.
To begin with, the results indicated that consumers will buy gifts for themselves when the important events happened, something achieved, some hard work finished, feeling stressed, being depressed, gaining some extra resources, and purchasing periodically. These situations were one-to-one corresponding to some motivations, respectively to remember, to reward, to compensate, to relieve, to revive, to keep in a good mood, and to be nice to oneself. In addition, self-gift giving behavior might be divided into four types by the degree of product-oriented (high vs. low) and the degree of information-prepared (high vs. low). However, few Taiwanese were classified by “high product-oriented and low information-prepared”, called “Glance”.
Secondly, the consumer guilt had three dimensions-hesitation, anguish, and remorse. Also, it had three moments of occurrence. The anticipatory guilt occurred before purchasing; the proceeding guilt occurred when purchasing; and the reactive guilt occurred after purchasing. Although each moment of consumer guilt included three dimensions meanwhile, what’s more important, the major dimension of anticipatory guilt was hesitation, the major dimension of proceeding guilt was anguish, and the major dimension of reactive guilt was remorse.
As for the relationship between consumers’ self-gift giving and consumer guilt, consumers had the highest degree of anticipatory guilt when they bought gifts for themselves under periodical purchase. However, consumers had the lowest degree of anticipatory guilt if they bought self-gifts under achievements or depression. Besides, if self-gift giving behavior was highly product-oriented, consumers would have financial consumer guilt. Moreover, if self-gift giving behavior was lowly product-oriented, consumers would have no consumer guilt.
Finally, this study concerned the functional/hedonic products moderating the relation between self-gift giving and consumer guilt. For those who bought themselves functional gifts, no matter this self-gift giving behavior belonged to highly or lowly product-oriented, consumers would have financial consumer guilt. For those who bought themselves hedonic gifts, if this self-gift giving behavior was highly product-oriented, consumers would have financial consumer guilt; however, if this self-gift giving behavior was lowly product-oriented, consumers would have no consumer guilt.
|
|---|
