Passive Stiffness of Coupled Wrist and Forearm Rotations

The dynamics of wrist rotations are dominated by joint stiffness, which the neuromuscular system must account and compensate for when controlling wrist movements. Because wrist stiffness is anisotropic, movements in some directions require less torque than movements in others, creating opportunities...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Drake, Will Brandon
Format: Others
Published: BYU ScholarsArchive 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/3446
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4445&context=etd
id ndltd-BGMYU2-oai-scholarsarchive.byu.edu-etd-4445
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-BGMYU2-oai-scholarsarchive.byu.edu-etd-44452019-05-16T03:20:59Z Passive Stiffness of Coupled Wrist and Forearm Rotations Drake, Will Brandon The dynamics of wrist rotations are dominated by joint stiffness, which the neuromuscular system must account and compensate for when controlling wrist movements. Because wrist stiffness is anisotropic, movements in some directions require less torque than movements in others, creating opportunities to follow "paths of least resistance." Forearm pronation-supination (PS) can combine with wrist flexion-extension (FE) and radial-ulnar deviation (RUD) to allow the wrist to rotate in directions of least stiffness. Evaluating this hypothesis, and understanding the control of combined wrist and forearm rotations in general, requires a knowledge of the stiffness (the dominant mechanical impedance) encountered during combined wrist and forearm rotations. While wrist and forearm stiffness have been measured in isolation, there are no measurements of coupled wrist and the forearm stiffness. This study characterizes the passive stiffness of the wrist and forearm in combinations of FE, RUD, and PS. Using a wrist and forearm robot, we measured coupled wrist and forearm stiffness for 15° movements from neutral position in 10 young, healthy subjects. We found the stiffness in PS to be significantly smaller than the stiffness in RUD, but similar in magnitude to the stiffness in FE, indicating that the torque required to overcome stiffness in combinations of PS and FE is significantly smaller than the torque required to overcome stiffness in combinations of FE and RUD (assuming equal displacements). The coupled stiffness measured here will enable future studies to determine optimal paths and to compare these optimal paths to observed movements involving wrist and forearm rotations. 2013-03-20T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/3446 https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4445&context=etd http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/ All Theses and Dissertations BYU ScholarsArchive wrist forearm stiffness passive muscle tone motor control Mechanical Engineering
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic wrist
forearm
stiffness
passive
muscle tone
motor control
Mechanical Engineering
spellingShingle wrist
forearm
stiffness
passive
muscle tone
motor control
Mechanical Engineering
Drake, Will Brandon
Passive Stiffness of Coupled Wrist and Forearm Rotations
description The dynamics of wrist rotations are dominated by joint stiffness, which the neuromuscular system must account and compensate for when controlling wrist movements. Because wrist stiffness is anisotropic, movements in some directions require less torque than movements in others, creating opportunities to follow "paths of least resistance." Forearm pronation-supination (PS) can combine with wrist flexion-extension (FE) and radial-ulnar deviation (RUD) to allow the wrist to rotate in directions of least stiffness. Evaluating this hypothesis, and understanding the control of combined wrist and forearm rotations in general, requires a knowledge of the stiffness (the dominant mechanical impedance) encountered during combined wrist and forearm rotations. While wrist and forearm stiffness have been measured in isolation, there are no measurements of coupled wrist and the forearm stiffness. This study characterizes the passive stiffness of the wrist and forearm in combinations of FE, RUD, and PS. Using a wrist and forearm robot, we measured coupled wrist and forearm stiffness for 15° movements from neutral position in 10 young, healthy subjects. We found the stiffness in PS to be significantly smaller than the stiffness in RUD, but similar in magnitude to the stiffness in FE, indicating that the torque required to overcome stiffness in combinations of PS and FE is significantly smaller than the torque required to overcome stiffness in combinations of FE and RUD (assuming equal displacements). The coupled stiffness measured here will enable future studies to determine optimal paths and to compare these optimal paths to observed movements involving wrist and forearm rotations.
author Drake, Will Brandon
author_facet Drake, Will Brandon
author_sort Drake, Will Brandon
title Passive Stiffness of Coupled Wrist and Forearm Rotations
title_short Passive Stiffness of Coupled Wrist and Forearm Rotations
title_full Passive Stiffness of Coupled Wrist and Forearm Rotations
title_fullStr Passive Stiffness of Coupled Wrist and Forearm Rotations
title_full_unstemmed Passive Stiffness of Coupled Wrist and Forearm Rotations
title_sort passive stiffness of coupled wrist and forearm rotations
publisher BYU ScholarsArchive
publishDate 2013
url https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/3446
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4445&context=etd
work_keys_str_mv AT drakewillbrandon passivestiffnessofcoupledwristandforearmrotations
_version_ 1719185608354562048