Teaching Professionalism: Comparing Written and Video Case-Studies
Purpose: Professionalism is a difficult concept to teach to healthcare professionals. Case-studies in written and video format have demonstrated to be effective teaching tools to improve a student’s knowledge, but little is known about their impact on student behaviour. The purpose of this research...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2021-05-01
|
Series: | Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205211020740 |
id |
doaj-fa72389c65eb4db393fafbcdbb46dbd2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-fa72389c65eb4db393fafbcdbb46dbd22021-05-31T21:34:26ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Medical Education and Curricular Development2382-12052021-05-01810.1177/23821205211020740Teaching Professionalism: Comparing Written and Video Case-StudiesChristina Wong0Lisa Purdy1Medical Laboratory Technologist, MEd (HSE), University of Alberta, Faculty of Education, Edmonton, AB, CanadaAssociate Professor of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, MSc (IMIN) University of Alberta, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Edmonton, AB, CanadaPurpose: Professionalism is a difficult concept to teach to healthcare professionals. Case-studies in written and video format have demonstrated to be effective teaching tools to improve a student’s knowledge, but little is known about their impact on student behaviour. The purpose of this research study was to investigate and compare the impact of the 2 teaching tools on a student’s behaviour during a simulation. Method: A 3-stage mixed method study was conducted with senior Medical Laboratory Science (MLS) undergraduate students. All students were randomly divided into a Written Group or Video Group to attend a mandatory professionalism workshop focused on bullying and gossip. Twenty-six students completed the voluntary assignment and 21 students participated in the voluntary group simulations. Thematic analysis was performed on the assignments and simulation. Frequencies of themes were calculated. A Group Simulation Assessment Rubric was used to score simulations and calculate an adjusted group performance average (AGPA). Results: The assignment demonstrates that students from both groups obtained a theoretical understanding of how to resolve gossip and bullying. From the Written Group and Video Group, 70%/18% of students discouraged/resolved gossiping and 80%/63% prevented bullying. The mean AGPA for the Written Group and Video Group was 5.4 and 4.9 respectively ( t (5) = 1.5, P = .2). Discussion: Students can successfully apply knowledge they have gained in written and video case-studies focused on the professionalism topics of bullying and gossip to a hypothetical situation. However, a discrepancy in their actions was found during the simulations. The data from the study suggests that written and video case-studies do not have different impacts on a student’s behaviour.https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205211020740 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Christina Wong Lisa Purdy |
spellingShingle |
Christina Wong Lisa Purdy Teaching Professionalism: Comparing Written and Video Case-Studies Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development |
author_facet |
Christina Wong Lisa Purdy |
author_sort |
Christina Wong |
title |
Teaching Professionalism: Comparing Written and Video Case-Studies |
title_short |
Teaching Professionalism: Comparing Written and Video Case-Studies |
title_full |
Teaching Professionalism: Comparing Written and Video Case-Studies |
title_fullStr |
Teaching Professionalism: Comparing Written and Video Case-Studies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Teaching Professionalism: Comparing Written and Video Case-Studies |
title_sort |
teaching professionalism: comparing written and video case-studies |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development |
issn |
2382-1205 |
publishDate |
2021-05-01 |
description |
Purpose: Professionalism is a difficult concept to teach to healthcare professionals. Case-studies in written and video format have demonstrated to be effective teaching tools to improve a student’s knowledge, but little is known about their impact on student behaviour. The purpose of this research study was to investigate and compare the impact of the 2 teaching tools on a student’s behaviour during a simulation. Method: A 3-stage mixed method study was conducted with senior Medical Laboratory Science (MLS) undergraduate students. All students were randomly divided into a Written Group or Video Group to attend a mandatory professionalism workshop focused on bullying and gossip. Twenty-six students completed the voluntary assignment and 21 students participated in the voluntary group simulations. Thematic analysis was performed on the assignments and simulation. Frequencies of themes were calculated. A Group Simulation Assessment Rubric was used to score simulations and calculate an adjusted group performance average (AGPA). Results: The assignment demonstrates that students from both groups obtained a theoretical understanding of how to resolve gossip and bullying. From the Written Group and Video Group, 70%/18% of students discouraged/resolved gossiping and 80%/63% prevented bullying. The mean AGPA for the Written Group and Video Group was 5.4 and 4.9 respectively ( t (5) = 1.5, P = .2). Discussion: Students can successfully apply knowledge they have gained in written and video case-studies focused on the professionalism topics of bullying and gossip to a hypothetical situation. However, a discrepancy in their actions was found during the simulations. The data from the study suggests that written and video case-studies do not have different impacts on a student’s behaviour. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205211020740 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT christinawong teachingprofessionalismcomparingwrittenandvideocasestudies AT lisapurdy teachingprofessionalismcomparingwrittenandvideocasestudies |
_version_ |
1721418789918081024 |