Teaching Professionalism: Comparing Written and Video Case-Studies

Purpose: Professionalism is a difficult concept to teach to healthcare professionals. Case-studies in written and video format have demonstrated to be effective teaching tools to improve a student’s knowledge, but little is known about their impact on student behaviour. The purpose of this research...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christina Wong, Lisa Purdy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-05-01
Series:Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205211020740
id doaj-fa72389c65eb4db393fafbcdbb46dbd2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fa72389c65eb4db393fafbcdbb46dbd22021-05-31T21:34:26ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Medical Education and Curricular Development2382-12052021-05-01810.1177/23821205211020740Teaching Professionalism: Comparing Written and Video Case-StudiesChristina Wong0Lisa Purdy1Medical Laboratory Technologist, MEd (HSE), University of Alberta, Faculty of Education, Edmonton, AB, CanadaAssociate Professor of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, MSc (IMIN) University of Alberta, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Edmonton, AB, CanadaPurpose: Professionalism is a difficult concept to teach to healthcare professionals. Case-studies in written and video format have demonstrated to be effective teaching tools to improve a student’s knowledge, but little is known about their impact on student behaviour. The purpose of this research study was to investigate and compare the impact of the 2 teaching tools on a student’s behaviour during a simulation. Method: A 3-stage mixed method study was conducted with senior Medical Laboratory Science (MLS) undergraduate students. All students were randomly divided into a Written Group or Video Group to attend a mandatory professionalism workshop focused on bullying and gossip. Twenty-six students completed the voluntary assignment and 21 students participated in the voluntary group simulations. Thematic analysis was performed on the assignments and simulation. Frequencies of themes were calculated. A Group Simulation Assessment Rubric was used to score simulations and calculate an adjusted group performance average (AGPA). Results: The assignment demonstrates that students from both groups obtained a theoretical understanding of how to resolve gossip and bullying. From the Written Group and Video Group, 70%/18% of students discouraged/resolved gossiping and 80%/63% prevented bullying. The mean AGPA for the Written Group and Video Group was 5.4 and 4.9 respectively ( t (5)  = 1.5, P  = .2). Discussion: Students can successfully apply knowledge they have gained in written and video case-studies focused on the professionalism topics of bullying and gossip to a hypothetical situation. However, a discrepancy in their actions was found during the simulations. The data from the study suggests that written and video case-studies do not have different impacts on a student’s behaviour.https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205211020740
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christina Wong
Lisa Purdy
spellingShingle Christina Wong
Lisa Purdy
Teaching Professionalism: Comparing Written and Video Case-Studies
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
author_facet Christina Wong
Lisa Purdy
author_sort Christina Wong
title Teaching Professionalism: Comparing Written and Video Case-Studies
title_short Teaching Professionalism: Comparing Written and Video Case-Studies
title_full Teaching Professionalism: Comparing Written and Video Case-Studies
title_fullStr Teaching Professionalism: Comparing Written and Video Case-Studies
title_full_unstemmed Teaching Professionalism: Comparing Written and Video Case-Studies
title_sort teaching professionalism: comparing written and video case-studies
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
issn 2382-1205
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Purpose: Professionalism is a difficult concept to teach to healthcare professionals. Case-studies in written and video format have demonstrated to be effective teaching tools to improve a student’s knowledge, but little is known about their impact on student behaviour. The purpose of this research study was to investigate and compare the impact of the 2 teaching tools on a student’s behaviour during a simulation. Method: A 3-stage mixed method study was conducted with senior Medical Laboratory Science (MLS) undergraduate students. All students were randomly divided into a Written Group or Video Group to attend a mandatory professionalism workshop focused on bullying and gossip. Twenty-six students completed the voluntary assignment and 21 students participated in the voluntary group simulations. Thematic analysis was performed on the assignments and simulation. Frequencies of themes were calculated. A Group Simulation Assessment Rubric was used to score simulations and calculate an adjusted group performance average (AGPA). Results: The assignment demonstrates that students from both groups obtained a theoretical understanding of how to resolve gossip and bullying. From the Written Group and Video Group, 70%/18% of students discouraged/resolved gossiping and 80%/63% prevented bullying. The mean AGPA for the Written Group and Video Group was 5.4 and 4.9 respectively ( t (5)  = 1.5, P  = .2). Discussion: Students can successfully apply knowledge they have gained in written and video case-studies focused on the professionalism topics of bullying and gossip to a hypothetical situation. However, a discrepancy in their actions was found during the simulations. The data from the study suggests that written and video case-studies do not have different impacts on a student’s behaviour.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205211020740
work_keys_str_mv AT christinawong teachingprofessionalismcomparingwrittenandvideocasestudies
AT lisapurdy teachingprofessionalismcomparingwrittenandvideocasestudies
_version_ 1721418789918081024