Disclosure of medical errors: physicians’ knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) in an oncology center

Abstract Background Between the need for transparency in healthcare, widely promoted by patient’s safety campaigns, and the fear of negative consequences and malpractice threats, physicians face challenging decisions on whether or not disclosing medical errors to patients and families is a valid opt...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Razan Mansour, Khawlah Ammar, Amal Al-Tabba, Thalia Arawi, Asem Mansour, Maysa Al-Hussaini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-08-01
Series:BMC Medical Ethics
Subjects:
Law
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12910-020-00513-2
id doaj-f76ab220f060446fb67adca07f41d344
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f76ab220f060446fb67adca07f41d3442020-11-25T03:35:02ZengBMCBMC Medical Ethics1472-69392020-08-012111810.1186/s12910-020-00513-2Disclosure of medical errors: physicians’ knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) in an oncology centerRazan Mansour0Khawlah Ammar1Amal Al-Tabba2Thalia Arawi3Asem Mansour4Maysa Al-Hussaini5University of Jordan, School of MedicineOffice of Scientific Affair and Research, King Hussein Cancer CenterOffice of Human Research Protection Program, King Hussein Cancer CenterSalim EL Hoss Bioethics and Professionalism Program, American University of Beirut Medical CenterOffice of Human Research Protection Program, King Hussein Cancer CenterOffice of Human Research Protection Program, King Hussein Cancer CenterAbstract Background Between the need for transparency in healthcare, widely promoted by patient’s safety campaigns, and the fear of negative consequences and malpractice threats, physicians face challenging decisions on whether or not disclosing medical errors to patients and families is a valid option. We aim to assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) of physicians in our center regarding medical error disclosure. Methods This is a cross-sectional self-administered questionnaire study. The questionnaire was piloted and no major modifications were made. A day-long training workshop consisting of didactic lectures, short and long case scenarios with role playing and feedback from the instructors, were conducted. Physicians who attended these training workshops were invited to complete the questionnaire at the end of the training, and physicians who did not attend any training were sent a copy of the questionnaire to their offices to complete. To assure anonymity and transparency of responses, we did not query names or departments. Descriptive statistics were used to present demographics and KAP. The differences between response\s of physicians who received the training and those who did not were analyzed with t-test and descriptive statistics. The 0.05 level of significance was used as a cutoff measure for statistical significance. Results Eighty-eight physicians completed the questionnaire (55 attended training (62.50%), and 33 did not (37.50%)). Sixty Five percent of physicians were males and the mean number of years of experience was 16.5 years. Eighty-Seven percent (n = 73) of physicians were more likely to report major harm, compared to minor harm or no harm. Physicians who attended the workshop were more knowledgeable of articles of Jordan’s Law on Medical and Health Liability (66.7% vs 45.5%, p-value = 0.017) and the Law was more likely to affect their decision on error disclosure (61.8% vs 36.4%, p-value = 0.024). Conclusion Formal training workshops on disclosing medical errors have the power to positively influence physicians’ KAP toward disclosing medical errors to patients and possibly promoting a culture of transparency in the health care system.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12910-020-00513-2Medical errorDisclosureLawTraining
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Razan Mansour
Khawlah Ammar
Amal Al-Tabba
Thalia Arawi
Asem Mansour
Maysa Al-Hussaini
spellingShingle Razan Mansour
Khawlah Ammar
Amal Al-Tabba
Thalia Arawi
Asem Mansour
Maysa Al-Hussaini
Disclosure of medical errors: physicians’ knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) in an oncology center
BMC Medical Ethics
Medical error
Disclosure
Law
Training
author_facet Razan Mansour
Khawlah Ammar
Amal Al-Tabba
Thalia Arawi
Asem Mansour
Maysa Al-Hussaini
author_sort Razan Mansour
title Disclosure of medical errors: physicians’ knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) in an oncology center
title_short Disclosure of medical errors: physicians’ knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) in an oncology center
title_full Disclosure of medical errors: physicians’ knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) in an oncology center
title_fullStr Disclosure of medical errors: physicians’ knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) in an oncology center
title_full_unstemmed Disclosure of medical errors: physicians’ knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) in an oncology center
title_sort disclosure of medical errors: physicians’ knowledge, attitudes and practices (kap) in an oncology center
publisher BMC
series BMC Medical Ethics
issn 1472-6939
publishDate 2020-08-01
description Abstract Background Between the need for transparency in healthcare, widely promoted by patient’s safety campaigns, and the fear of negative consequences and malpractice threats, physicians face challenging decisions on whether or not disclosing medical errors to patients and families is a valid option. We aim to assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) of physicians in our center regarding medical error disclosure. Methods This is a cross-sectional self-administered questionnaire study. The questionnaire was piloted and no major modifications were made. A day-long training workshop consisting of didactic lectures, short and long case scenarios with role playing and feedback from the instructors, were conducted. Physicians who attended these training workshops were invited to complete the questionnaire at the end of the training, and physicians who did not attend any training were sent a copy of the questionnaire to their offices to complete. To assure anonymity and transparency of responses, we did not query names or departments. Descriptive statistics were used to present demographics and KAP. The differences between response\s of physicians who received the training and those who did not were analyzed with t-test and descriptive statistics. The 0.05 level of significance was used as a cutoff measure for statistical significance. Results Eighty-eight physicians completed the questionnaire (55 attended training (62.50%), and 33 did not (37.50%)). Sixty Five percent of physicians were males and the mean number of years of experience was 16.5 years. Eighty-Seven percent (n = 73) of physicians were more likely to report major harm, compared to minor harm or no harm. Physicians who attended the workshop were more knowledgeable of articles of Jordan’s Law on Medical and Health Liability (66.7% vs 45.5%, p-value = 0.017) and the Law was more likely to affect their decision on error disclosure (61.8% vs 36.4%, p-value = 0.024). Conclusion Formal training workshops on disclosing medical errors have the power to positively influence physicians’ KAP toward disclosing medical errors to patients and possibly promoting a culture of transparency in the health care system.
topic Medical error
Disclosure
Law
Training
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12910-020-00513-2
work_keys_str_mv AT razanmansour disclosureofmedicalerrorsphysiciansknowledgeattitudesandpracticeskapinanoncologycenter
AT khawlahammar disclosureofmedicalerrorsphysiciansknowledgeattitudesandpracticeskapinanoncologycenter
AT amalaltabba disclosureofmedicalerrorsphysiciansknowledgeattitudesandpracticeskapinanoncologycenter
AT thaliaarawi disclosureofmedicalerrorsphysiciansknowledgeattitudesandpracticeskapinanoncologycenter
AT asemmansour disclosureofmedicalerrorsphysiciansknowledgeattitudesandpracticeskapinanoncologycenter
AT maysaalhussaini disclosureofmedicalerrorsphysiciansknowledgeattitudesandpracticeskapinanoncologycenter
_version_ 1724555946056744960