Insulin/IGF1 signalling mediates the effects of β2‐adrenergic agonist on muscle proteostasis and growth

Abstract Background Stimulation of β2‐adrenoceptors can promote muscle hypertrophy and fibre type shift, and it can counteract atrophy and weakness. The underlying mechanisms remain elusive. Methods Fed wild type (WT), 2‐day fasted WT, muscle‐specific insulin (INS) receptor (IR) knockout (M‐IR−/−),...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dawit A. Gonçalves, Wilian A. Silveira, Leandro H. Manfredi, Flávia A. Graça, Andrea Armani, Enrico Bertaggia, Brian T. O´Neill, Natalia Lautherbach, Juliano Machado, Leonardo Nogara, Marcelo G. Pereira, Diletta Arcidiacono, Stefano Realdon, C. Ronald Kahn, Marco Sandri, Isis C. Kettelhut, Luiz Carlos C. Navegantes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-04-01
Series:Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12395
id doaj-f341a8776db04f97b5771d9cee49e3e4
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dawit A. Gonçalves
Wilian A. Silveira
Leandro H. Manfredi
Flávia A. Graça
Andrea Armani
Enrico Bertaggia
Brian T. O´Neill
Natalia Lautherbach
Juliano Machado
Leonardo Nogara
Marcelo G. Pereira
Diletta Arcidiacono
Stefano Realdon
C. Ronald Kahn
Marco Sandri
Isis C. Kettelhut
Luiz Carlos C. Navegantes
spellingShingle Dawit A. Gonçalves
Wilian A. Silveira
Leandro H. Manfredi
Flávia A. Graça
Andrea Armani
Enrico Bertaggia
Brian T. O´Neill
Natalia Lautherbach
Juliano Machado
Leonardo Nogara
Marcelo G. Pereira
Diletta Arcidiacono
Stefano Realdon
C. Ronald Kahn
Marco Sandri
Isis C. Kettelhut
Luiz Carlos C. Navegantes
Insulin/IGF1 signalling mediates the effects of β2‐adrenergic agonist on muscle proteostasis and growth
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
β2‐adrenoceptor
Insulin/IGF1 signalling
Protein metabolism
Skeletal muscle function
Skeletal muscle plasticity
Autophagy‐lysosomal system
author_facet Dawit A. Gonçalves
Wilian A. Silveira
Leandro H. Manfredi
Flávia A. Graça
Andrea Armani
Enrico Bertaggia
Brian T. O´Neill
Natalia Lautherbach
Juliano Machado
Leonardo Nogara
Marcelo G. Pereira
Diletta Arcidiacono
Stefano Realdon
C. Ronald Kahn
Marco Sandri
Isis C. Kettelhut
Luiz Carlos C. Navegantes
author_sort Dawit A. Gonçalves
title Insulin/IGF1 signalling mediates the effects of β2‐adrenergic agonist on muscle proteostasis and growth
title_short Insulin/IGF1 signalling mediates the effects of β2‐adrenergic agonist on muscle proteostasis and growth
title_full Insulin/IGF1 signalling mediates the effects of β2‐adrenergic agonist on muscle proteostasis and growth
title_fullStr Insulin/IGF1 signalling mediates the effects of β2‐adrenergic agonist on muscle proteostasis and growth
title_full_unstemmed Insulin/IGF1 signalling mediates the effects of β2‐adrenergic agonist on muscle proteostasis and growth
title_sort insulin/igf1 signalling mediates the effects of β2‐adrenergic agonist on muscle proteostasis and growth
publisher Wiley
series Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
issn 2190-5991
2190-6009
publishDate 2019-04-01
description Abstract Background Stimulation of β2‐adrenoceptors can promote muscle hypertrophy and fibre type shift, and it can counteract atrophy and weakness. The underlying mechanisms remain elusive. Methods Fed wild type (WT), 2‐day fasted WT, muscle‐specific insulin (INS) receptor (IR) knockout (M‐IR−/−), and MKR mice were studied with regard to acute effects of the β2‐agonist formoterol (FOR) on protein metabolism and signalling events. MKR mice express a dominant negative IGF1 receptor, which blocks both INS/IGF1 signalling. All received one injection of FOR (300 μg kg−1 subcutaneously) or saline. Skeletal muscles and serum samples were analysed from 30 to 240 min. For the study of chronic effects of FOR on muscle plasticity and function as well as intracellular signalling pathways, fed WT and MKR mice were treated with formoterol (300 μg kg−1 day−1) for 30 days. Results In fed and fasted mice, one injection of FOR inhibited autophagosome formation (LC3‐II content, 65%, P ≤ 0.05) that was paralleled by an increase in serum INS levels (4‐fold to 25‐fold, P ≤ 0.05) and the phosphorylation of Akt (4.4‐fold to 6.5‐fold, P ≤ 0.05) and ERK1/2 (50% to two‐fold, P ≤ 0.05). This led to the suppression (40–70%, P ≤ 0.05) of the master regulators of atrophy, FoxOs, and the mRNA levels of their target genes. FOR enhanced (41%, P ≤ 0.05) protein synthesis only in fed condition and stimulated (4.4‐fold to 35‐fold, P ≤ 0.05) the prosynthetic Akt/mTOR/p70S6K pathway in both fed and fasted states. FOR effects on Akt signalling during fasting were blunted in both M‐IR−/− and MKR mice. Inhibition of proteolysis markers by FOR was prevented only in MKR mice. Blockade of PI3K/Akt axis and mTORC1, but not ERK1/2, in fasted mice also suppressed the acute FOR effects on proteolysis and autophagy. Chronic stimulation of β2‐adrenoceptors in fed WT mice increased body (11%, P ≤ 0.05) and muscle (15%, P ≤ 0.05) growth and downregulated atrophy‐related genes (30–40%, P ≤ 0.05), but these effects were abolished in MKR mice. Increases in muscle force caused by FOR (WT, 24%, P ≤ 0.05) were only partially impaired in MKR mice (12%, P ≤ 0.05), and FOR‐induced slow‐to‐fast fibre type shift was not blocked at all in these animals. In MKR mice, FOR also restored the lower levels of muscle SDH activity to basal WT values and caused a marked reduction (57%, P ≤ 0.05) in the number of centrally nucleated fibers. Conclusions NS/IGF1 signalling is necessary for the anti‐proteolytic and hypertrophic effects of in vivo β2‐adrenergic stimulation and appears to mediate FOR‐induced enhancement of protein synthesis. INS/IGF1 signalling only partially contributes to gain in strength and does not mediate fibre type transition induced by FOR.
topic β2‐adrenoceptor
Insulin/IGF1 signalling
Protein metabolism
Skeletal muscle function
Skeletal muscle plasticity
Autophagy‐lysosomal system
url https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12395
work_keys_str_mv AT dawitagoncalves insulinigf1signallingmediatestheeffectsofb2adrenergicagonistonmuscleproteostasisandgrowth
AT wilianasilveira insulinigf1signallingmediatestheeffectsofb2adrenergicagonistonmuscleproteostasisandgrowth
AT leandrohmanfredi insulinigf1signallingmediatestheeffectsofb2adrenergicagonistonmuscleproteostasisandgrowth
AT flaviaagraca insulinigf1signallingmediatestheeffectsofb2adrenergicagonistonmuscleproteostasisandgrowth
AT andreaarmani insulinigf1signallingmediatestheeffectsofb2adrenergicagonistonmuscleproteostasisandgrowth
AT enricobertaggia insulinigf1signallingmediatestheeffectsofb2adrenergicagonistonmuscleproteostasisandgrowth
AT briantoneill insulinigf1signallingmediatestheeffectsofb2adrenergicagonistonmuscleproteostasisandgrowth
AT natalialautherbach insulinigf1signallingmediatestheeffectsofb2adrenergicagonistonmuscleproteostasisandgrowth
AT julianomachado insulinigf1signallingmediatestheeffectsofb2adrenergicagonistonmuscleproteostasisandgrowth
AT leonardonogara insulinigf1signallingmediatestheeffectsofb2adrenergicagonistonmuscleproteostasisandgrowth
AT marcelogpereira insulinigf1signallingmediatestheeffectsofb2adrenergicagonistonmuscleproteostasisandgrowth
AT dilettaarcidiacono insulinigf1signallingmediatestheeffectsofb2adrenergicagonistonmuscleproteostasisandgrowth
AT stefanorealdon insulinigf1signallingmediatestheeffectsofb2adrenergicagonistonmuscleproteostasisandgrowth
AT cronaldkahn insulinigf1signallingmediatestheeffectsofb2adrenergicagonistonmuscleproteostasisandgrowth
AT marcosandri insulinigf1signallingmediatestheeffectsofb2adrenergicagonistonmuscleproteostasisandgrowth
AT isisckettelhut insulinigf1signallingmediatestheeffectsofb2adrenergicagonistonmuscleproteostasisandgrowth
AT luizcarloscnavegantes insulinigf1signallingmediatestheeffectsofb2adrenergicagonistonmuscleproteostasisandgrowth
_version_ 1724911742244356096
spelling doaj-f341a8776db04f97b5771d9cee49e3e42020-11-25T02:11:56ZengWileyJournal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle2190-59912190-60092019-04-0110245547510.1002/jcsm.12395Insulin/IGF1 signalling mediates the effects of β2‐adrenergic agonist on muscle proteostasis and growthDawit A. Gonçalves0Wilian A. Silveira1Leandro H. Manfredi2Flávia A. Graça3Andrea Armani4Enrico Bertaggia5Brian T. O´Neill6Natalia Lautherbach7Juliano Machado8Leonardo Nogara9Marcelo G. Pereira10Diletta Arcidiacono11Stefano Realdon12C. Ronald Kahn13Marco Sandri14Isis C. Kettelhut15Luiz Carlos C. Navegantes16Department of Physiology Ribeirão Preto Medical School/University of São Paulo Ribeirão Preto SP BrazilDepartment of Physiology Ribeirão Preto Medical School/University of São Paulo Ribeirão Preto SP BrazilDepartment of Physiology Ribeirão Preto Medical School/University of São Paulo Ribeirão Preto SP BrazilDepartment of Physiology Ribeirão Preto Medical School/University of São Paulo Ribeirão Preto SP BrazilDepartment of Biomedical Sciences University of Padova Padova ItalyDepartment of Biomedical Sciences University of Padova Padova ItalySection on Integrative Physiology and Metabolism, Joslin Diabetes Center Harvard Medical School Boston MA USADepartment of Physiology Ribeirão Preto Medical School/University of São Paulo Ribeirão Preto SP BrazilDepartment of Physiology Ribeirão Preto Medical School/University of São Paulo Ribeirão Preto SP BrazilDepartment of Biomedical Sciences University of Padova Padova ItalyDepartment of Biomedical Sciences University of Padova Padova ItalyDigestive Endoscopy Unit Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV‐IRCCS Padova ItalyDigestive Endoscopy Unit Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV‐IRCCS Padova ItalySection on Integrative Physiology and Metabolism, Joslin Diabetes Center Harvard Medical School Boston MA USADepartment of Biomedical Sciences University of Padova Padova ItalyDepartment of Physiology Ribeirão Preto Medical School/University of São Paulo Ribeirão Preto SP BrazilDepartment of Physiology Ribeirão Preto Medical School/University of São Paulo Ribeirão Preto SP BrazilAbstract Background Stimulation of β2‐adrenoceptors can promote muscle hypertrophy and fibre type shift, and it can counteract atrophy and weakness. The underlying mechanisms remain elusive. Methods Fed wild type (WT), 2‐day fasted WT, muscle‐specific insulin (INS) receptor (IR) knockout (M‐IR−/−), and MKR mice were studied with regard to acute effects of the β2‐agonist formoterol (FOR) on protein metabolism and signalling events. MKR mice express a dominant negative IGF1 receptor, which blocks both INS/IGF1 signalling. All received one injection of FOR (300 μg kg−1 subcutaneously) or saline. Skeletal muscles and serum samples were analysed from 30 to 240 min. For the study of chronic effects of FOR on muscle plasticity and function as well as intracellular signalling pathways, fed WT and MKR mice were treated with formoterol (300 μg kg−1 day−1) for 30 days. Results In fed and fasted mice, one injection of FOR inhibited autophagosome formation (LC3‐II content, 65%, P ≤ 0.05) that was paralleled by an increase in serum INS levels (4‐fold to 25‐fold, P ≤ 0.05) and the phosphorylation of Akt (4.4‐fold to 6.5‐fold, P ≤ 0.05) and ERK1/2 (50% to two‐fold, P ≤ 0.05). This led to the suppression (40–70%, P ≤ 0.05) of the master regulators of atrophy, FoxOs, and the mRNA levels of their target genes. FOR enhanced (41%, P ≤ 0.05) protein synthesis only in fed condition and stimulated (4.4‐fold to 35‐fold, P ≤ 0.05) the prosynthetic Akt/mTOR/p70S6K pathway in both fed and fasted states. FOR effects on Akt signalling during fasting were blunted in both M‐IR−/− and MKR mice. Inhibition of proteolysis markers by FOR was prevented only in MKR mice. Blockade of PI3K/Akt axis and mTORC1, but not ERK1/2, in fasted mice also suppressed the acute FOR effects on proteolysis and autophagy. Chronic stimulation of β2‐adrenoceptors in fed WT mice increased body (11%, P ≤ 0.05) and muscle (15%, P ≤ 0.05) growth and downregulated atrophy‐related genes (30–40%, P ≤ 0.05), but these effects were abolished in MKR mice. Increases in muscle force caused by FOR (WT, 24%, P ≤ 0.05) were only partially impaired in MKR mice (12%, P ≤ 0.05), and FOR‐induced slow‐to‐fast fibre type shift was not blocked at all in these animals. In MKR mice, FOR also restored the lower levels of muscle SDH activity to basal WT values and caused a marked reduction (57%, P ≤ 0.05) in the number of centrally nucleated fibers. Conclusions NS/IGF1 signalling is necessary for the anti‐proteolytic and hypertrophic effects of in vivo β2‐adrenergic stimulation and appears to mediate FOR‐induced enhancement of protein synthesis. INS/IGF1 signalling only partially contributes to gain in strength and does not mediate fibre type transition induced by FOR.https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12395β2‐adrenoceptorInsulin/IGF1 signallingProtein metabolismSkeletal muscle functionSkeletal muscle plasticityAutophagy‐lysosomal system