Analyzing false positives of four questions in the Force Concept Inventory
In this study, we analyze the systematic error from false positives of the Force Concept Inventory (FCI). We compare the systematic errors of question 6 (Q.6), Q.7, and Q.16, for which clearly erroneous reasoning has been found, with Q.5, for which clearly erroneous reasoning has not been found. We...
Main Authors: | Jun-ichiro Yasuda, Naohiro Mae, Michael M. Hull, Masa-aki Taniguchi |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
American Physical Society
2018-03-01
|
Series: | Physical Review Physics Education Research |
Online Access: | http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.010112 |
Similar Items
-
Validating two questions in the Force Concept Inventory with subquestions
by: Jun-ichiro Yasuda, et al.
Published: (2013-04-01) -
Optimizing the length of computerized adaptive testing for the Force Concept Inventory
by: Jun-ichiro Yasuda, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01) -
Validating the Force Concept Inventory with Sub-Questions: Preliminary Results of the Second Year Survey
by: Jun-ichiro Yasuda, et al.
Published: (2017-04-01) -
Validating the Force Concept Inventory with Sub-Questions: Preliminary Results of the Second Year Survey
by: Jun-ichiro Yasuda, et al.
Published: (2017-04-01) -
Validating the Force Concept Inventory with Sub-Questions: Preliminary Results of the Second Year Survey
by: Jun-ichiro Yasuda, et al.
Published: (2017-04-01)