Language policy and the disengagement of the international academic elite
This paper explores the phenomena of academic multiliteracy (the habit of writing academically in more than one language) and of L2 monoliteracy (that of only writing academically in a language that is not one’s own) and their impact on policy. Based on interviews and surveys conducted with 33 multi...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Korean Council of Science Editors
2018-02-01
|
Series: | Science Editing |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.escienceediting.org/upload/se-5-1-32.pdf |
id |
doaj-f20bc28fdff14b50919428fb5a7e320a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f20bc28fdff14b50919428fb5a7e320a2021-09-02T06:14:10ZengKorean Council of Science EditorsScience Editing2288-80632288-74742018-02-0151323810.6087/kcse.115126Language policy and the disengagement of the international academic eliteJohn HarbordThis paper explores the phenomena of academic multiliteracy (the habit of writing academically in more than one language) and of L2 monoliteracy (that of only writing academically in a language that is not one’s own) and their impact on policy. Based on interviews and surveys conducted with 33 multiliterate and 15 L2 monoliterate scholars connected to one university in Central Europe between 2010 and 2014, I show how incentives to publish in English constructed by educational policies often push ambitious young researchers whose first language is not English away from engaging in academic and societal debates in their first language community. They may thus disengage from the national community, with negative consequences for the interaction between global and local that is essential for good governance. To overcome the difficulty young scholars encounter in writing in their native languages, they should be taught writing both in their native language and in English. Furthermore, university and state policies should reward scholars for writing not only for the international community but also for local society.http://www.escienceediting.org/upload/se-5-1-32.pdfLanguageMotivationPublishingResearch personnelReward |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
John Harbord |
spellingShingle |
John Harbord Language policy and the disengagement of the international academic elite Science Editing Language Motivation Publishing Research personnel Reward |
author_facet |
John Harbord |
author_sort |
John Harbord |
title |
Language policy and the disengagement of the international academic elite |
title_short |
Language policy and the disengagement of the international academic elite |
title_full |
Language policy and the disengagement of the international academic elite |
title_fullStr |
Language policy and the disengagement of the international academic elite |
title_full_unstemmed |
Language policy and the disengagement of the international academic elite |
title_sort |
language policy and the disengagement of the international academic elite |
publisher |
Korean Council of Science Editors |
series |
Science Editing |
issn |
2288-8063 2288-7474 |
publishDate |
2018-02-01 |
description |
This paper explores the phenomena of academic multiliteracy (the habit of writing academically in more than one language) and of L2 monoliteracy (that of only writing academically in a language that is not one’s own) and their impact on policy. Based on interviews and surveys conducted with 33 multiliterate and 15 L2 monoliterate scholars connected to one university in Central Europe between 2010 and 2014, I show how incentives to publish in English constructed by educational policies often push ambitious young researchers whose first language is not English away from engaging in academic and societal debates in their first language community. They may thus disengage from the national community, with negative consequences for the interaction between global and local that is essential for good governance. To overcome the difficulty young scholars encounter in writing in their native languages, they should be taught writing both in their native language and in English. Furthermore, university and state policies should reward scholars for writing not only for the international community but also for local society. |
topic |
Language Motivation Publishing Research personnel Reward |
url |
http://www.escienceediting.org/upload/se-5-1-32.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT johnharbord languagepolicyandthedisengagementoftheinternationalacademicelite |
_version_ |
1721179233687961600 |