The Impact of Minority Status in the Application of Affirmative Action: NAIDOO v MINISTER of SAFETY and SECURITY 2013 5 BLLR 490 (LC)

Affirmative action measures within the workplace seek to ensure equal employment opportunities and create a workforce that is representative of South African society. Accordingly, employers need to ensure that the substantive goal of equality is achieved when implementing affirmative action. One of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Helen Papacostantis, Muriel Mushariwa
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: North-West University 2016-05-01
Series:Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.assaf.org.za/per/article/view/1160/1090
id doaj-f0101edfbd5744f297941048ee24e487
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f0101edfbd5744f297941048ee24e4872020-11-25T02:58:16ZafrNorth-West UniversityPotchefstroom Electronic Law Journal1727-37812016-05-0119125http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2016/v19i0a1160The Impact of Minority Status in the Application of Affirmative Action: NAIDOO v MINISTER of SAFETY and SECURITY 2013 5 BLLR 490 (LC)Helen Papacostantis0Muriel Mushariwa1University of the WitwatersrandUniversity of the WitwatersrandAffirmative action measures within the workplace seek to ensure equal employment opportunities and create a workforce that is representative of South African society. Accordingly, employers need to ensure that the substantive goal of equality is achieved when implementing affirmative action. One of the challenges faced by employers is the choice of beneficiary from designated groups which is diverse and unequal within itself. This paper seeks to address this challenge by looking at the definition given to beneficiaries of affirmative action and the concept of multi layered disadvantage within the Employment Equity Act. The paper will focus on the decision in Naidoo v Minister of Safety and Security and National Commissioner of the South African Police Service which is an example of the disadvantages experienced by members of the designated groups who are also part of a minority group within the designated groups. Particular focus will be placed on the disadvantages experienced by a black female who is also part of a minority. This paper highlights the multi-layered nature of disadvantage experienced by such members of the designated groups and the need to ensure that new forms of disadvantage are not created in the implementation of affirmative action policies by using a situation sensitive approach. It argues that affirmative action as a means to an end needs to evolve with the understanding that it functions within an ever changing social and economic environment. If such changes are ignored the true beneficiaries of affirmative action will not be given recognition and the desired end of creating a workforce representative of South African society together with the goal of substantive equality cannot be realised.http://journals.assaf.org.za/per/article/view/1160/1090Affirmative actionminority groupmulti layered disadvantagesituation sensitivedesignated groupsequalityemployment equity.
collection DOAJ
language Afrikaans
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Helen Papacostantis
Muriel Mushariwa
spellingShingle Helen Papacostantis
Muriel Mushariwa
The Impact of Minority Status in the Application of Affirmative Action: NAIDOO v MINISTER of SAFETY and SECURITY 2013 5 BLLR 490 (LC)
Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
Affirmative action
minority group
multi layered disadvantage
situation sensitive
designated groups
equality
employment equity.
author_facet Helen Papacostantis
Muriel Mushariwa
author_sort Helen Papacostantis
title The Impact of Minority Status in the Application of Affirmative Action: NAIDOO v MINISTER of SAFETY and SECURITY 2013 5 BLLR 490 (LC)
title_short The Impact of Minority Status in the Application of Affirmative Action: NAIDOO v MINISTER of SAFETY and SECURITY 2013 5 BLLR 490 (LC)
title_full The Impact of Minority Status in the Application of Affirmative Action: NAIDOO v MINISTER of SAFETY and SECURITY 2013 5 BLLR 490 (LC)
title_fullStr The Impact of Minority Status in the Application of Affirmative Action: NAIDOO v MINISTER of SAFETY and SECURITY 2013 5 BLLR 490 (LC)
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Minority Status in the Application of Affirmative Action: NAIDOO v MINISTER of SAFETY and SECURITY 2013 5 BLLR 490 (LC)
title_sort impact of minority status in the application of affirmative action: naidoo v minister of safety and security 2013 5 bllr 490 (lc)
publisher North-West University
series Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
issn 1727-3781
publishDate 2016-05-01
description Affirmative action measures within the workplace seek to ensure equal employment opportunities and create a workforce that is representative of South African society. Accordingly, employers need to ensure that the substantive goal of equality is achieved when implementing affirmative action. One of the challenges faced by employers is the choice of beneficiary from designated groups which is diverse and unequal within itself. This paper seeks to address this challenge by looking at the definition given to beneficiaries of affirmative action and the concept of multi layered disadvantage within the Employment Equity Act. The paper will focus on the decision in Naidoo v Minister of Safety and Security and National Commissioner of the South African Police Service which is an example of the disadvantages experienced by members of the designated groups who are also part of a minority group within the designated groups. Particular focus will be placed on the disadvantages experienced by a black female who is also part of a minority. This paper highlights the multi-layered nature of disadvantage experienced by such members of the designated groups and the need to ensure that new forms of disadvantage are not created in the implementation of affirmative action policies by using a situation sensitive approach. It argues that affirmative action as a means to an end needs to evolve with the understanding that it functions within an ever changing social and economic environment. If such changes are ignored the true beneficiaries of affirmative action will not be given recognition and the desired end of creating a workforce representative of South African society together with the goal of substantive equality cannot be realised.
topic Affirmative action
minority group
multi layered disadvantage
situation sensitive
designated groups
equality
employment equity.
url http://journals.assaf.org.za/per/article/view/1160/1090
work_keys_str_mv AT helenpapacostantis theimpactofminoritystatusintheapplicationofaffirmativeactionnaidoovministerofsafetyandsecurity20135bllr490lc
AT murielmushariwa theimpactofminoritystatusintheapplicationofaffirmativeactionnaidoovministerofsafetyandsecurity20135bllr490lc
AT helenpapacostantis impactofminoritystatusintheapplicationofaffirmativeactionnaidoovministerofsafetyandsecurity20135bllr490lc
AT murielmushariwa impactofminoritystatusintheapplicationofaffirmativeactionnaidoovministerofsafetyandsecurity20135bllr490lc
_version_ 1724707481724125184