Philosophy of teaching: When win-argument pedagogy is a loss for the composition classroom
Despite the effort educators put into developing in students the critical writing and thinking skills needed to compose effective arguments, undergraduate college students are often accused of churning out essays lacking in creative and critical thought, arguments too obviously formulated and with s...
Main Author: | Wendy LEE GROSSKOPF |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Pedagogical University of Cracow
2015-06-01
|
Series: | Argument : Biannual Philosophical Journal |
Online Access: | http://argumentwp.vipserv.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/pdfv5n1/argument_v5_n1_phil-of-teach_Grosskopf.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Pedagogy of Argumentation: Teaching the Skills of Argumentation to Older Teens
by: Luydmyla Moskalyova, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01) -
The Generic Argument for teaching philosophy
by: Philip Cam
Published: (2018-04-01) -
AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY TO ASSESS THE ABILITY OF EVIDENCE, ARGUMENT, AND DELIVERY TO DISCRIMINATE FOR WIN/LOSS IN A DEBATE.
by: SMITH-DONALDSON, JACQUELINE JILL.
Published: (1983) -
Arctic Development: How to Avoid Loss of Quality when Winning Speed?
by: Sergei V. Kuznetsov, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01) -
Pedagogies of Noise: Black Women’s Teaching Efficacy and Pedagogical Approaches in Composition Classrooms
by: Roundtree, Sherita Vaungh
Published: (2019)