What is the impact of rerouting a cancer diagnosis from emergency presentation to GP referral on resource use and survival? Evidence from a population-based study

Abstract Background Studies on alternative routes to diagnosis stimulated successful policy interventions reducing the number of emergency diagnoses and associated mortality risk. A dearth of evidence on the costs of such interventions might prevent new policies from achieving more ambitious targets...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mauro Laudicella, Brendan Walsh, Elaine Burns, Paolo Li Donni, Peter C. Smith
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-04-01
Series:BMC Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-018-4274-0
id doaj-ec76e0f89aad4711a0849ce1963a29a8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ec76e0f89aad4711a0849ce1963a29a82020-11-25T02:25:52ZengBMCBMC Cancer1471-24072018-04-011811910.1186/s12885-018-4274-0What is the impact of rerouting a cancer diagnosis from emergency presentation to GP referral on resource use and survival? Evidence from a population-based studyMauro Laudicella0Brendan Walsh1Elaine Burns2Paolo Li Donni3Peter C. Smith4School of Health Sciences, City, University of LondonSocial Research Division, Economic and Social Research InstituteDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary’s CampusEconomics Department, University of PalermoBusiness School, Imperial College London, South Kensington CampusAbstract Background Studies on alternative routes to diagnosis stimulated successful policy interventions reducing the number of emergency diagnoses and associated mortality risk. A dearth of evidence on the costs of such interventions might prevent new policies from achieving more ambitious targets. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study on the population of colorectal (88,051), breast (90,387), prostate (96,219), and lung (97,696) cancer patients diagnosed after a GP referral or an emergency presentation and reported in the Cancer Registry of England. Resource use and survival were compared 1 year before and 5 years after diagnosis (3 years for lung), including the costs of GP referrals not converted into a positive diagnosis. Risk-adjusted statistical models were used to calculate the effect of rerouting patient’ diagnoses from emergency presentation to GP referral. Results Rerouting a cancer diagnosis results in a relatively small additional costs to the National Health System against additional years of life saved to the patient. The cost per year of life saved is £6456 in colorectal, £1057 in breast, −£662 in prostate (savings), and £819 in lung cancer. Reducing the overall prevalence of emergency presentations to the level achieved by the 20% of Clinical Commissioning Groups with the lowest prevalence would result in £11,481,948 against 1863 years of life saved for Colorectal, £847,750 against 889 years for breast, −£943,434 (cost savings) against 1195 years for prostate, and £609,938 against 1011 years for lung cancer. Conclusion Redirecting diagnoses from emergency presentation to GP referral appears an achievable target that can produce large benefits to patients against modest additional costs to the National Health System.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-018-4274-0Route to diagnosisEmergencyPrimary careHospital costsSurvivalEarly diagnosis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mauro Laudicella
Brendan Walsh
Elaine Burns
Paolo Li Donni
Peter C. Smith
spellingShingle Mauro Laudicella
Brendan Walsh
Elaine Burns
Paolo Li Donni
Peter C. Smith
What is the impact of rerouting a cancer diagnosis from emergency presentation to GP referral on resource use and survival? Evidence from a population-based study
BMC Cancer
Route to diagnosis
Emergency
Primary care
Hospital costs
Survival
Early diagnosis
author_facet Mauro Laudicella
Brendan Walsh
Elaine Burns
Paolo Li Donni
Peter C. Smith
author_sort Mauro Laudicella
title What is the impact of rerouting a cancer diagnosis from emergency presentation to GP referral on resource use and survival? Evidence from a population-based study
title_short What is the impact of rerouting a cancer diagnosis from emergency presentation to GP referral on resource use and survival? Evidence from a population-based study
title_full What is the impact of rerouting a cancer diagnosis from emergency presentation to GP referral on resource use and survival? Evidence from a population-based study
title_fullStr What is the impact of rerouting a cancer diagnosis from emergency presentation to GP referral on resource use and survival? Evidence from a population-based study
title_full_unstemmed What is the impact of rerouting a cancer diagnosis from emergency presentation to GP referral on resource use and survival? Evidence from a population-based study
title_sort what is the impact of rerouting a cancer diagnosis from emergency presentation to gp referral on resource use and survival? evidence from a population-based study
publisher BMC
series BMC Cancer
issn 1471-2407
publishDate 2018-04-01
description Abstract Background Studies on alternative routes to diagnosis stimulated successful policy interventions reducing the number of emergency diagnoses and associated mortality risk. A dearth of evidence on the costs of such interventions might prevent new policies from achieving more ambitious targets. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study on the population of colorectal (88,051), breast (90,387), prostate (96,219), and lung (97,696) cancer patients diagnosed after a GP referral or an emergency presentation and reported in the Cancer Registry of England. Resource use and survival were compared 1 year before and 5 years after diagnosis (3 years for lung), including the costs of GP referrals not converted into a positive diagnosis. Risk-adjusted statistical models were used to calculate the effect of rerouting patient’ diagnoses from emergency presentation to GP referral. Results Rerouting a cancer diagnosis results in a relatively small additional costs to the National Health System against additional years of life saved to the patient. The cost per year of life saved is £6456 in colorectal, £1057 in breast, −£662 in prostate (savings), and £819 in lung cancer. Reducing the overall prevalence of emergency presentations to the level achieved by the 20% of Clinical Commissioning Groups with the lowest prevalence would result in £11,481,948 against 1863 years of life saved for Colorectal, £847,750 against 889 years for breast, −£943,434 (cost savings) against 1195 years for prostate, and £609,938 against 1011 years for lung cancer. Conclusion Redirecting diagnoses from emergency presentation to GP referral appears an achievable target that can produce large benefits to patients against modest additional costs to the National Health System.
topic Route to diagnosis
Emergency
Primary care
Hospital costs
Survival
Early diagnosis
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-018-4274-0
work_keys_str_mv AT maurolaudicella whatistheimpactofreroutingacancerdiagnosisfromemergencypresentationtogpreferralonresourceuseandsurvivalevidencefromapopulationbasedstudy
AT brendanwalsh whatistheimpactofreroutingacancerdiagnosisfromemergencypresentationtogpreferralonresourceuseandsurvivalevidencefromapopulationbasedstudy
AT elaineburns whatistheimpactofreroutingacancerdiagnosisfromemergencypresentationtogpreferralonresourceuseandsurvivalevidencefromapopulationbasedstudy
AT paololidonni whatistheimpactofreroutingacancerdiagnosisfromemergencypresentationtogpreferralonresourceuseandsurvivalevidencefromapopulationbasedstudy
AT petercsmith whatistheimpactofreroutingacancerdiagnosisfromemergencypresentationtogpreferralonresourceuseandsurvivalevidencefromapopulationbasedstudy
_version_ 1724849856329023488