What is the impact of rerouting a cancer diagnosis from emergency presentation to GP referral on resource use and survival? Evidence from a population-based study
Abstract Background Studies on alternative routes to diagnosis stimulated successful policy interventions reducing the number of emergency diagnoses and associated mortality risk. A dearth of evidence on the costs of such interventions might prevent new policies from achieving more ambitious targets...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-04-01
|
Series: | BMC Cancer |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-018-4274-0 |
id |
doaj-ec76e0f89aad4711a0849ce1963a29a8 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ec76e0f89aad4711a0849ce1963a29a82020-11-25T02:25:52ZengBMCBMC Cancer1471-24072018-04-011811910.1186/s12885-018-4274-0What is the impact of rerouting a cancer diagnosis from emergency presentation to GP referral on resource use and survival? Evidence from a population-based studyMauro Laudicella0Brendan Walsh1Elaine Burns2Paolo Li Donni3Peter C. Smith4School of Health Sciences, City, University of LondonSocial Research Division, Economic and Social Research InstituteDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary’s CampusEconomics Department, University of PalermoBusiness School, Imperial College London, South Kensington CampusAbstract Background Studies on alternative routes to diagnosis stimulated successful policy interventions reducing the number of emergency diagnoses and associated mortality risk. A dearth of evidence on the costs of such interventions might prevent new policies from achieving more ambitious targets. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study on the population of colorectal (88,051), breast (90,387), prostate (96,219), and lung (97,696) cancer patients diagnosed after a GP referral or an emergency presentation and reported in the Cancer Registry of England. Resource use and survival were compared 1 year before and 5 years after diagnosis (3 years for lung), including the costs of GP referrals not converted into a positive diagnosis. Risk-adjusted statistical models were used to calculate the effect of rerouting patient’ diagnoses from emergency presentation to GP referral. Results Rerouting a cancer diagnosis results in a relatively small additional costs to the National Health System against additional years of life saved to the patient. The cost per year of life saved is £6456 in colorectal, £1057 in breast, −£662 in prostate (savings), and £819 in lung cancer. Reducing the overall prevalence of emergency presentations to the level achieved by the 20% of Clinical Commissioning Groups with the lowest prevalence would result in £11,481,948 against 1863 years of life saved for Colorectal, £847,750 against 889 years for breast, −£943,434 (cost savings) against 1195 years for prostate, and £609,938 against 1011 years for lung cancer. Conclusion Redirecting diagnoses from emergency presentation to GP referral appears an achievable target that can produce large benefits to patients against modest additional costs to the National Health System.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-018-4274-0Route to diagnosisEmergencyPrimary careHospital costsSurvivalEarly diagnosis |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mauro Laudicella Brendan Walsh Elaine Burns Paolo Li Donni Peter C. Smith |
spellingShingle |
Mauro Laudicella Brendan Walsh Elaine Burns Paolo Li Donni Peter C. Smith What is the impact of rerouting a cancer diagnosis from emergency presentation to GP referral on resource use and survival? Evidence from a population-based study BMC Cancer Route to diagnosis Emergency Primary care Hospital costs Survival Early diagnosis |
author_facet |
Mauro Laudicella Brendan Walsh Elaine Burns Paolo Li Donni Peter C. Smith |
author_sort |
Mauro Laudicella |
title |
What is the impact of rerouting a cancer diagnosis from emergency presentation to GP referral on resource use and survival? Evidence from a population-based study |
title_short |
What is the impact of rerouting a cancer diagnosis from emergency presentation to GP referral on resource use and survival? Evidence from a population-based study |
title_full |
What is the impact of rerouting a cancer diagnosis from emergency presentation to GP referral on resource use and survival? Evidence from a population-based study |
title_fullStr |
What is the impact of rerouting a cancer diagnosis from emergency presentation to GP referral on resource use and survival? Evidence from a population-based study |
title_full_unstemmed |
What is the impact of rerouting a cancer diagnosis from emergency presentation to GP referral on resource use and survival? Evidence from a population-based study |
title_sort |
what is the impact of rerouting a cancer diagnosis from emergency presentation to gp referral on resource use and survival? evidence from a population-based study |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Cancer |
issn |
1471-2407 |
publishDate |
2018-04-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Studies on alternative routes to diagnosis stimulated successful policy interventions reducing the number of emergency diagnoses and associated mortality risk. A dearth of evidence on the costs of such interventions might prevent new policies from achieving more ambitious targets. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study on the population of colorectal (88,051), breast (90,387), prostate (96,219), and lung (97,696) cancer patients diagnosed after a GP referral or an emergency presentation and reported in the Cancer Registry of England. Resource use and survival were compared 1 year before and 5 years after diagnosis (3 years for lung), including the costs of GP referrals not converted into a positive diagnosis. Risk-adjusted statistical models were used to calculate the effect of rerouting patient’ diagnoses from emergency presentation to GP referral. Results Rerouting a cancer diagnosis results in a relatively small additional costs to the National Health System against additional years of life saved to the patient. The cost per year of life saved is £6456 in colorectal, £1057 in breast, −£662 in prostate (savings), and £819 in lung cancer. Reducing the overall prevalence of emergency presentations to the level achieved by the 20% of Clinical Commissioning Groups with the lowest prevalence would result in £11,481,948 against 1863 years of life saved for Colorectal, £847,750 against 889 years for breast, −£943,434 (cost savings) against 1195 years for prostate, and £609,938 against 1011 years for lung cancer. Conclusion Redirecting diagnoses from emergency presentation to GP referral appears an achievable target that can produce large benefits to patients against modest additional costs to the National Health System. |
topic |
Route to diagnosis Emergency Primary care Hospital costs Survival Early diagnosis |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-018-4274-0 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT maurolaudicella whatistheimpactofreroutingacancerdiagnosisfromemergencypresentationtogpreferralonresourceuseandsurvivalevidencefromapopulationbasedstudy AT brendanwalsh whatistheimpactofreroutingacancerdiagnosisfromemergencypresentationtogpreferralonresourceuseandsurvivalevidencefromapopulationbasedstudy AT elaineburns whatistheimpactofreroutingacancerdiagnosisfromemergencypresentationtogpreferralonresourceuseandsurvivalevidencefromapopulationbasedstudy AT paololidonni whatistheimpactofreroutingacancerdiagnosisfromemergencypresentationtogpreferralonresourceuseandsurvivalevidencefromapopulationbasedstudy AT petercsmith whatistheimpactofreroutingacancerdiagnosisfromemergencypresentationtogpreferralonresourceuseandsurvivalevidencefromapopulationbasedstudy |
_version_ |
1724849856329023488 |