The governmentality of teaching and learning: acquiescence or resistance?

This article critiques the ethics of teaching and learning (T&L) practices in the university. It argues they consummate contemporary regimes of government through the backdoor of the classroom. To this end, the university is first depicted as an organisation opened up by the imperatives of advan...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bregham Dalgliesh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of the Western Cape 2017-06-01
Series:Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning
Subjects:
Online Access:http://cristal.epubs.ac.za/index.php/cristal/article/view/105
id doaj-e9fd58ec76094b73936bf21467a2c054
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e9fd58ec76094b73936bf21467a2c0542020-11-24T23:05:57ZengUniversity of the Western CapeCritical Studies in Teaching and Learning2310-71032017-06-0151183510.14426/cristal.v5i1.105105The governmentality of teaching and learning: acquiescence or resistance?Bregham Dalgliesh0University of TokyoThis article critiques the ethics of teaching and learning (T&L) practices in the university. It argues they consummate contemporary regimes of government through the backdoor of the classroom. To this end, the university is first depicted as an organisation opened up by the imperatives of advanced liberalism. The article then examines Henry Giroux’s critical pedagogy, which links the cultivation of critical citizens to a democratic polity. However, Giroux’s proposal for student emancipation through juxtaposing knowledge with power is rejected in favour of a Foucauldian framework of governmentality. It understands the teaching and learning regimes (TLRs) of active learning as a solution to the imperatives of the conduct of conduct incited by advanced liberal government, which traditional T&L practices of passive learning are unable to satisfy. The innocuousness of these changes in student conduct is subsequently interpreted in terms of its ethical import. Following Michel Foucault’s demarcation of ethics from morality, four elements of ethics are discerned and mapped onto TLRs: the ethical substance, or what to act on (mind); the ethical work, or how to act upon (individualisation); the mode of subjectification, or who must act (autonomous learners); and the ethical conduct, or why we must act (self-entrepreneurial subjects). Finally, the article suggests the academic’s purgatory between their former identity as a teacher and their current role as an instructor can be resolved in the classroom itself through an agonistic ethical relation to the student, which is simultaneously a form of resistance of TLRs.http://cristal.epubs.ac.za/index.php/cristal/article/view/105Critical pedagogygovernmentalityethicsuniversityteaching and learning regimes
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bregham Dalgliesh
spellingShingle Bregham Dalgliesh
The governmentality of teaching and learning: acquiescence or resistance?
Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning
Critical pedagogy
governmentality
ethics
university
teaching and learning regimes
author_facet Bregham Dalgliesh
author_sort Bregham Dalgliesh
title The governmentality of teaching and learning: acquiescence or resistance?
title_short The governmentality of teaching and learning: acquiescence or resistance?
title_full The governmentality of teaching and learning: acquiescence or resistance?
title_fullStr The governmentality of teaching and learning: acquiescence or resistance?
title_full_unstemmed The governmentality of teaching and learning: acquiescence or resistance?
title_sort governmentality of teaching and learning: acquiescence or resistance?
publisher University of the Western Cape
series Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning
issn 2310-7103
publishDate 2017-06-01
description This article critiques the ethics of teaching and learning (T&L) practices in the university. It argues they consummate contemporary regimes of government through the backdoor of the classroom. To this end, the university is first depicted as an organisation opened up by the imperatives of advanced liberalism. The article then examines Henry Giroux’s critical pedagogy, which links the cultivation of critical citizens to a democratic polity. However, Giroux’s proposal for student emancipation through juxtaposing knowledge with power is rejected in favour of a Foucauldian framework of governmentality. It understands the teaching and learning regimes (TLRs) of active learning as a solution to the imperatives of the conduct of conduct incited by advanced liberal government, which traditional T&L practices of passive learning are unable to satisfy. The innocuousness of these changes in student conduct is subsequently interpreted in terms of its ethical import. Following Michel Foucault’s demarcation of ethics from morality, four elements of ethics are discerned and mapped onto TLRs: the ethical substance, or what to act on (mind); the ethical work, or how to act upon (individualisation); the mode of subjectification, or who must act (autonomous learners); and the ethical conduct, or why we must act (self-entrepreneurial subjects). Finally, the article suggests the academic’s purgatory between their former identity as a teacher and their current role as an instructor can be resolved in the classroom itself through an agonistic ethical relation to the student, which is simultaneously a form of resistance of TLRs.
topic Critical pedagogy
governmentality
ethics
university
teaching and learning regimes
url http://cristal.epubs.ac.za/index.php/cristal/article/view/105
work_keys_str_mv AT breghamdalgliesh thegovernmentalityofteachingandlearningacquiescenceorresistance
AT breghamdalgliesh governmentalityofteachingandlearningacquiescenceorresistance
_version_ 1725624673234845696