Comparative evaluation of wet gluten quantity and quality through different methods

The wet gluten quantity is usually determined by the manual washing or Gluten Index Method (GIM), a fully automatic rapid method. The aim of this study was to compare the GIM with the Romanian methodsused for analysis of wet gluten quantity and quality, and to establish the ratio between wet gluten...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Violeta IONESCU, Georgeta STOENESCU, Ina VASILEAN, Iuliana APRODU, Iuliana BANU
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Galati University Press 2010-12-01
Series:Annals of the University Dunarea de Jos of Galati. Fascicle VI: Food Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ann.ugal.ro/tpa/Anale%202010/vol%202/Full%20paper%20VSIonescu.pdf
id doaj-e99630e1f02f4238b4b131c8a417816b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e99630e1f02f4238b4b131c8a417816b2020-11-25T00:14:43ZengGalati University PressAnnals of the University Dunarea de Jos of Galati. Fascicle VI: Food Technology1843-51572068-259X2010-12-013424448Comparative evaluation of wet gluten quantity and quality through different methods Violeta IONESCUGeorgeta STOENESCUIna VASILEANIuliana APRODUIuliana BANUThe wet gluten quantity is usually determined by the manual washing or Gluten Index Method (GIM), a fully automatic rapid method. The aim of this study was to compare the GIM with the Romanian methodsused for analysis of wet gluten quantity and quality, and to establish the ratio between wet gluten content and grain protein content for different Romanian wheat varieties. The results indicate that there is no statistically significant difference between the tested methods. The linear correlation coefficients calculated for the wet gluten content measured by GIM and manual washing methods were r2 = 0.93, in case of SR ISO 21415-1:2007 method, and r2 = 0.90, in case of the method proposed in 2008 (Manual de gradare pentru seminte de consum). The WG/P ratios ranged between 1.91 and 2.26.http://www.ann.ugal.ro/tpa/Anale%202010/vol%202/Full%20paper%20VSIonescu.pdfwet gluten quantitywheat qualityGluten Index Method
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Violeta IONESCU
Georgeta STOENESCU
Ina VASILEAN
Iuliana APRODU
Iuliana BANU
spellingShingle Violeta IONESCU
Georgeta STOENESCU
Ina VASILEAN
Iuliana APRODU
Iuliana BANU
Comparative evaluation of wet gluten quantity and quality through different methods
Annals of the University Dunarea de Jos of Galati. Fascicle VI: Food Technology
wet gluten quantity
wheat quality
Gluten Index Method
author_facet Violeta IONESCU
Georgeta STOENESCU
Ina VASILEAN
Iuliana APRODU
Iuliana BANU
author_sort Violeta IONESCU
title Comparative evaluation of wet gluten quantity and quality through different methods
title_short Comparative evaluation of wet gluten quantity and quality through different methods
title_full Comparative evaluation of wet gluten quantity and quality through different methods
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of wet gluten quantity and quality through different methods
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of wet gluten quantity and quality through different methods
title_sort comparative evaluation of wet gluten quantity and quality through different methods
publisher Galati University Press
series Annals of the University Dunarea de Jos of Galati. Fascicle VI: Food Technology
issn 1843-5157
2068-259X
publishDate 2010-12-01
description The wet gluten quantity is usually determined by the manual washing or Gluten Index Method (GIM), a fully automatic rapid method. The aim of this study was to compare the GIM with the Romanian methodsused for analysis of wet gluten quantity and quality, and to establish the ratio between wet gluten content and grain protein content for different Romanian wheat varieties. The results indicate that there is no statistically significant difference between the tested methods. The linear correlation coefficients calculated for the wet gluten content measured by GIM and manual washing methods were r2 = 0.93, in case of SR ISO 21415-1:2007 method, and r2 = 0.90, in case of the method proposed in 2008 (Manual de gradare pentru seminte de consum). The WG/P ratios ranged between 1.91 and 2.26.
topic wet gluten quantity
wheat quality
Gluten Index Method
url http://www.ann.ugal.ro/tpa/Anale%202010/vol%202/Full%20paper%20VSIonescu.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT violetaionescu comparativeevaluationofwetglutenquantityandqualitythroughdifferentmethods
AT georgetastoenescu comparativeevaluationofwetglutenquantityandqualitythroughdifferentmethods
AT inavasilean comparativeevaluationofwetglutenquantityandqualitythroughdifferentmethods
AT iulianaaprodu comparativeevaluationofwetglutenquantityandqualitythroughdifferentmethods
AT iulianabanu comparativeevaluationofwetglutenquantityandqualitythroughdifferentmethods
_version_ 1725388887827677184