Model analysis: Representing and assessing the dynamics of student learning

Decades of education research have shown that students can simultaneously possess alternate knowledge frameworks and that the development and use of such knowledge are context dependent. As a result of extensive qualitative research, standardized multiple-choice tests such as Force Concept Inventory...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Edward F. Redish, Lei Bao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Physical Society 2006-02-01
Series:Physical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.aps.org/abstract/PRSTPER/v2/e010103
id doaj-e80d18d916c147048bbec2b6f12c8e27
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e80d18d916c147048bbec2b6f12c8e272020-11-24T22:15:00ZengAmerican Physical SocietyPhysical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research1554-91782006-02-0121Model analysis: Representing and assessing the dynamics of student learningEdward F. RedishLei BaoDecades of education research have shown that students can simultaneously possess alternate knowledge frameworks and that the development and use of such knowledge are context dependent. As a result of extensive qualitative research, standardized multiple-choice tests such as Force Concept Inventory and Force-Motion Concept Evaluation tests provide instructors tools to probe their students’ conceptual knowledge of physics. However, many existing quantitative analysis methods often focus on a binary question of whether a student answers a question correctly or not. This greatly limits the capacity of using the standardized multiple-choice tests in assessing students’ alternative knowledge. In addition, the context dependence issue, which suggests that a student may apply the correct knowledge in some situations and revert to use alternative types of knowledge in others, is often treated as random noise in current analyses. In this paper, we present a model analysis, which applies qualitative research to establish a quantitative representation framework. With this method, students’ alternative knowledge and the probabilities for students to use such knowledge in a range of equivalent contexts can be quantitatively assessed. This provides a way to analyze research-based multiple choice questions, which can generate much richer information than what is available from score-based analysis.http://link.aps.org/abstract/PRSTPER/v2/e010103Student learningModel analysisResearch-based multiple choice questions
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Edward F. Redish
Lei Bao
spellingShingle Edward F. Redish
Lei Bao
Model analysis: Representing and assessing the dynamics of student learning
Physical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research
Student learning
Model analysis
Research-based multiple choice questions
author_facet Edward F. Redish
Lei Bao
author_sort Edward F. Redish
title Model analysis: Representing and assessing the dynamics of student learning
title_short Model analysis: Representing and assessing the dynamics of student learning
title_full Model analysis: Representing and assessing the dynamics of student learning
title_fullStr Model analysis: Representing and assessing the dynamics of student learning
title_full_unstemmed Model analysis: Representing and assessing the dynamics of student learning
title_sort model analysis: representing and assessing the dynamics of student learning
publisher American Physical Society
series Physical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research
issn 1554-9178
publishDate 2006-02-01
description Decades of education research have shown that students can simultaneously possess alternate knowledge frameworks and that the development and use of such knowledge are context dependent. As a result of extensive qualitative research, standardized multiple-choice tests such as Force Concept Inventory and Force-Motion Concept Evaluation tests provide instructors tools to probe their students’ conceptual knowledge of physics. However, many existing quantitative analysis methods often focus on a binary question of whether a student answers a question correctly or not. This greatly limits the capacity of using the standardized multiple-choice tests in assessing students’ alternative knowledge. In addition, the context dependence issue, which suggests that a student may apply the correct knowledge in some situations and revert to use alternative types of knowledge in others, is often treated as random noise in current analyses. In this paper, we present a model analysis, which applies qualitative research to establish a quantitative representation framework. With this method, students’ alternative knowledge and the probabilities for students to use such knowledge in a range of equivalent contexts can be quantitatively assessed. This provides a way to analyze research-based multiple choice questions, which can generate much richer information than what is available from score-based analysis.
topic Student learning
Model analysis
Research-based multiple choice questions
url http://link.aps.org/abstract/PRSTPER/v2/e010103
work_keys_str_mv AT edwardfredish modelanalysisrepresentingandassessingthedynamicsofstudentlearning
AT leibao modelanalysisrepresentingandassessingthedynamicsofstudentlearning
_version_ 1716577208669044736