Explaining Chinese Learners’ Errors in the Phonological Representations of Latinate Derivatives in English: A Psycholinguistic Perspective

Abstract Investigations of ESL pronunciation have focused on segments, syllable structure and prosody. This study examines the phonological representations of English Latinate derivatives of 32 Cantonese speakers and 32 native speakers (NS) from the perspectives of morphophonemics and word associ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Siok H. Lee, Stephen Carey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Carleton University 2002-06-01
Series:Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics
Online Access:https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/CJAL/article/view/19840
id doaj-e4bf130a8bc741fbb0ebba821c3f8498
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e4bf130a8bc741fbb0ebba821c3f84982021-03-02T00:41:25ZengCarleton UniversityCanadian Journal of Applied Linguistics1481-868X1920-18182002-06-01516591Explaining Chinese Learners’ Errors in the Phonological Representations of Latinate Derivatives in English: A Psycholinguistic PerspectiveSiok H. Lee0Stephen Carey1Burnaby School District and Simon Fraser UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaAbstract Investigations of ESL pronunciation have focused on segments, syllable structure and prosody. This study examines the phonological representations of English Latinate derivatives of 32 Cantonese speakers and 32 native speakers (NS) from the perspectives of morphophonemics and word association. The subjects (Grade 12) performed tests on listening, pronunciation and semantic rating of word pairs. The results confirmed the hypothesis that in the absence of analogous morphological and morphophonemic features in the L1, base-word pronunciation was the dominant error type for both learners and the NS subjects. As both groups showed comparable rates of recognition of the semantic association between morphologically related words, this recognition seems to account for the dominant error type of both ESL and NS groups.https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/CJAL/article/view/19840
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Siok H. Lee
Stephen Carey
spellingShingle Siok H. Lee
Stephen Carey
Explaining Chinese Learners’ Errors in the Phonological Representations of Latinate Derivatives in English: A Psycholinguistic Perspective
Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics
author_facet Siok H. Lee
Stephen Carey
author_sort Siok H. Lee
title Explaining Chinese Learners’ Errors in the Phonological Representations of Latinate Derivatives in English: A Psycholinguistic Perspective
title_short Explaining Chinese Learners’ Errors in the Phonological Representations of Latinate Derivatives in English: A Psycholinguistic Perspective
title_full Explaining Chinese Learners’ Errors in the Phonological Representations of Latinate Derivatives in English: A Psycholinguistic Perspective
title_fullStr Explaining Chinese Learners’ Errors in the Phonological Representations of Latinate Derivatives in English: A Psycholinguistic Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Explaining Chinese Learners’ Errors in the Phonological Representations of Latinate Derivatives in English: A Psycholinguistic Perspective
title_sort explaining chinese learners’ errors in the phonological representations of latinate derivatives in english: a psycholinguistic perspective
publisher Carleton University
series Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics
issn 1481-868X
1920-1818
publishDate 2002-06-01
description Abstract Investigations of ESL pronunciation have focused on segments, syllable structure and prosody. This study examines the phonological representations of English Latinate derivatives of 32 Cantonese speakers and 32 native speakers (NS) from the perspectives of morphophonemics and word association. The subjects (Grade 12) performed tests on listening, pronunciation and semantic rating of word pairs. The results confirmed the hypothesis that in the absence of analogous morphological and morphophonemic features in the L1, base-word pronunciation was the dominant error type for both learners and the NS subjects. As both groups showed comparable rates of recognition of the semantic association between morphologically related words, this recognition seems to account for the dominant error type of both ESL and NS groups.
url https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/CJAL/article/view/19840
work_keys_str_mv AT siokhlee explainingchineselearnerserrorsinthephonologicalrepresentationsoflatinatederivativesinenglishapsycholinguisticperspective
AT stephencarey explainingchineselearnerserrorsinthephonologicalrepresentationsoflatinatederivativesinenglishapsycholinguisticperspective
_version_ 1724245269813395456