The Complexity of Comparative Judgments in Assessing Argumentative Writing: An Eye Tracking Study
Comparative judgment (CJ) has been recently introduced in the educational field as a means of assessing competences. In this judgement process, assessors are presented with two pieces of student work and are asked to choose which one is better in relation to the competencies being assessed. However,...
Main Authors: | Marijn Gijsen, Tine van Daal, Marije Lesterhuis, David Gijbels, Sven De Maeyer |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-02-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Education |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2020.582800/full |
Similar Items
-
Applying Criteria to Examples or Learning by Comparison: Effects on Students' Evaluative Judgment and Performance in Writing
by: Renske Bouwer, et al.
Published: (2018-10-01) -
Rationality, Judgment, and Argument Assessment
by: Paul Healy
Published: (1994-01-01) -
Eye tracking in Educational Science: Theoretical frameworks and research agendas
by: Halszka Jarodzka, et al.
Published: (2017-02-01) -
Gaze tracking dataset for comparison of smooth and saccadic eye tracking
by: Adam Pantanowitz, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01) -
A Recurrent Neural Network for Attenuating Non-cognitive Components of Pupil Dynamics
by: Sharath Koorathota, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01)