Processing ordinality and quantity: the case of developmental dyscalculia.

In contrast to quantity processing, up to date, the nature of ordinality has received little attention from researchers despite the fact that both quantity and ordinality are embodied in numerical information. Here we ask if there are two separate core systems that lie at the foundations of numerica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Orly Rubinsten, Dana Sury
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2011-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/21935374/pdf/?tool=EBI
id doaj-e49b1cb0d4a0482ab297c228991b17e3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e49b1cb0d4a0482ab297c228991b17e32021-03-03T19:52:22ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032011-01-0169e2407910.1371/journal.pone.0024079Processing ordinality and quantity: the case of developmental dyscalculia.Orly RubinstenDana SuryIn contrast to quantity processing, up to date, the nature of ordinality has received little attention from researchers despite the fact that both quantity and ordinality are embodied in numerical information. Here we ask if there are two separate core systems that lie at the foundations of numerical cognition: (1) the traditionally and well accepted numerical magnitude system but also (2) core system for representing ordinal information. We report two novel experiments of ordinal processing that explored the relation between ordinal and numerical information processing in typically developing adults and adults with developmental dyscalculia (DD). Participants made "ordered" or "non-ordered" judgments about 3 groups of dots (non-symbolic numerical stimuli; in Experiment 1) and 3 numbers (symbolic task: Experiment 2). In contrast to previous findings and arguments about quantity deficit in DD participants, when quantity and ordinality are dissociated (as in the current tasks), DD participants exhibited a normal ratio effect in the non-symbolic ordinal task. They did not show, however, the ordinality effect. Ordinality effect in DD appeared only when area and density were randomized, but only in the descending direction. In the symbolic task, the ordinality effect was modulated by ratio and direction in both groups. These findings suggest that there might be two separate cognitive representations of ordinal and quantity information and that linguistic knowledge may facilitate estimation of ordinal information.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/21935374/pdf/?tool=EBI
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Orly Rubinsten
Dana Sury
spellingShingle Orly Rubinsten
Dana Sury
Processing ordinality and quantity: the case of developmental dyscalculia.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Orly Rubinsten
Dana Sury
author_sort Orly Rubinsten
title Processing ordinality and quantity: the case of developmental dyscalculia.
title_short Processing ordinality and quantity: the case of developmental dyscalculia.
title_full Processing ordinality and quantity: the case of developmental dyscalculia.
title_fullStr Processing ordinality and quantity: the case of developmental dyscalculia.
title_full_unstemmed Processing ordinality and quantity: the case of developmental dyscalculia.
title_sort processing ordinality and quantity: the case of developmental dyscalculia.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2011-01-01
description In contrast to quantity processing, up to date, the nature of ordinality has received little attention from researchers despite the fact that both quantity and ordinality are embodied in numerical information. Here we ask if there are two separate core systems that lie at the foundations of numerical cognition: (1) the traditionally and well accepted numerical magnitude system but also (2) core system for representing ordinal information. We report two novel experiments of ordinal processing that explored the relation between ordinal and numerical information processing in typically developing adults and adults with developmental dyscalculia (DD). Participants made "ordered" or "non-ordered" judgments about 3 groups of dots (non-symbolic numerical stimuli; in Experiment 1) and 3 numbers (symbolic task: Experiment 2). In contrast to previous findings and arguments about quantity deficit in DD participants, when quantity and ordinality are dissociated (as in the current tasks), DD participants exhibited a normal ratio effect in the non-symbolic ordinal task. They did not show, however, the ordinality effect. Ordinality effect in DD appeared only when area and density were randomized, but only in the descending direction. In the symbolic task, the ordinality effect was modulated by ratio and direction in both groups. These findings suggest that there might be two separate cognitive representations of ordinal and quantity information and that linguistic knowledge may facilitate estimation of ordinal information.
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/21935374/pdf/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT orlyrubinsten processingordinalityandquantitythecaseofdevelopmentaldyscalculia
AT danasury processingordinalityandquantitythecaseofdevelopmentaldyscalculia
_version_ 1714825364868431872