Electrofusion Stimulation Is an Independent Factor of Chromosome Abnormality in Mice Oocytes Reconstructed via Spindle Transfer

Oocytes reconstructed by spindle transfer (ST) are prone to chromosome abnormality, which is speculated to be caused by mechanical interference or premature activation, the mechanism is controversial. In this study, C57BL/6N oocytes were used as the model, and electrofusion ST was performed under no...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wei Wang, Suxia Shao, Wei Chen, Weizhou Wang, Yunhai Chuai, Yunfei Li, Yiming Guo, Shujie Han, Mingming Shu, Qihang Wang, Lei Zhang, Wei Shang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Endocrinology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2021.705837/full
id doaj-e46974a294e14083a6e5c47e7780d490
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wei Wang
Wei Wang
Wei Wang
Wei Wang
Suxia Shao
Wei Chen
Weizhou Wang
Weizhou Wang
Yunhai Chuai
Yunhai Chuai
Yunfei Li
Yunfei Li
Yunfei Li
Yiming Guo
Shujie Han
Shujie Han
Shujie Han
Mingming Shu
Mingming Shu
Qihang Wang
Lei Zhang
Wei Shang
Wei Shang
Wei Shang
spellingShingle Wei Wang
Wei Wang
Wei Wang
Wei Wang
Suxia Shao
Wei Chen
Weizhou Wang
Weizhou Wang
Yunhai Chuai
Yunhai Chuai
Yunfei Li
Yunfei Li
Yunfei Li
Yiming Guo
Shujie Han
Shujie Han
Shujie Han
Mingming Shu
Mingming Shu
Qihang Wang
Lei Zhang
Wei Shang
Wei Shang
Wei Shang
Electrofusion Stimulation Is an Independent Factor of Chromosome Abnormality in Mice Oocytes Reconstructed via Spindle Transfer
Frontiers in Endocrinology
spindle transfer
electrofusion
electrofusion stimulation
premature activation
chromosome abnormality
author_facet Wei Wang
Wei Wang
Wei Wang
Wei Wang
Suxia Shao
Wei Chen
Weizhou Wang
Weizhou Wang
Yunhai Chuai
Yunhai Chuai
Yunfei Li
Yunfei Li
Yunfei Li
Yiming Guo
Shujie Han
Shujie Han
Shujie Han
Mingming Shu
Mingming Shu
Qihang Wang
Lei Zhang
Wei Shang
Wei Shang
Wei Shang
author_sort Wei Wang
title Electrofusion Stimulation Is an Independent Factor of Chromosome Abnormality in Mice Oocytes Reconstructed via Spindle Transfer
title_short Electrofusion Stimulation Is an Independent Factor of Chromosome Abnormality in Mice Oocytes Reconstructed via Spindle Transfer
title_full Electrofusion Stimulation Is an Independent Factor of Chromosome Abnormality in Mice Oocytes Reconstructed via Spindle Transfer
title_fullStr Electrofusion Stimulation Is an Independent Factor of Chromosome Abnormality in Mice Oocytes Reconstructed via Spindle Transfer
title_full_unstemmed Electrofusion Stimulation Is an Independent Factor of Chromosome Abnormality in Mice Oocytes Reconstructed via Spindle Transfer
title_sort electrofusion stimulation is an independent factor of chromosome abnormality in mice oocytes reconstructed via spindle transfer
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Endocrinology
issn 1664-2392
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Oocytes reconstructed by spindle transfer (ST) are prone to chromosome abnormality, which is speculated to be caused by mechanical interference or premature activation, the mechanism is controversial. In this study, C57BL/6N oocytes were used as the model, and electrofusion ST was performed under normal conditions, Ca2+ free, and at room temperature, respectively. The effect of enucleation and electrofusion stimulation on MPF activity, spindle morphology, γ-tubulin localization and chromosome arrangement was compared. We found that electrofusion stimulation could induce premature chromosome separation and abnormal spindle morphology and assembly by decreasing the MPF activity, leading to premature activation, and thus resulting in chromosome abnormality in oocytes reconstructed via ST. Electrofusion stimulation was an independent factor of chromosome abnormality in oocytes reconstructed via ST, and was not related to enucleation, fusion status, temperature, or Ca2+. The electrofusion stimulation number should be minimized, with no more than 2 times being appropriate. As the electrofusion stimulation number increased, several typical abnormalities in chromosome arrangement and spindle assembly occurred. Although blastocyst culture could eliminate embryos with chromosomal abnormalities, it would significantly decrease the number of normal embryos and reduce the availability of embryos. The optimum operating condition for electrofusion ST was the 37°C group without Ca2+.
topic spindle transfer
electrofusion
electrofusion stimulation
premature activation
chromosome abnormality
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2021.705837/full
work_keys_str_mv AT weiwang electrofusionstimulationisanindependentfactorofchromosomeabnormalityinmiceoocytesreconstructedviaspindletransfer
AT weiwang electrofusionstimulationisanindependentfactorofchromosomeabnormalityinmiceoocytesreconstructedviaspindletransfer
AT weiwang electrofusionstimulationisanindependentfactorofchromosomeabnormalityinmiceoocytesreconstructedviaspindletransfer
AT weiwang electrofusionstimulationisanindependentfactorofchromosomeabnormalityinmiceoocytesreconstructedviaspindletransfer
AT suxiashao electrofusionstimulationisanindependentfactorofchromosomeabnormalityinmiceoocytesreconstructedviaspindletransfer
AT weichen electrofusionstimulationisanindependentfactorofchromosomeabnormalityinmiceoocytesreconstructedviaspindletransfer
AT weizhouwang electrofusionstimulationisanindependentfactorofchromosomeabnormalityinmiceoocytesreconstructedviaspindletransfer
AT weizhouwang electrofusionstimulationisanindependentfactorofchromosomeabnormalityinmiceoocytesreconstructedviaspindletransfer
AT yunhaichuai electrofusionstimulationisanindependentfactorofchromosomeabnormalityinmiceoocytesreconstructedviaspindletransfer
AT yunhaichuai electrofusionstimulationisanindependentfactorofchromosomeabnormalityinmiceoocytesreconstructedviaspindletransfer
AT yunfeili electrofusionstimulationisanindependentfactorofchromosomeabnormalityinmiceoocytesreconstructedviaspindletransfer
AT yunfeili electrofusionstimulationisanindependentfactorofchromosomeabnormalityinmiceoocytesreconstructedviaspindletransfer
AT yunfeili electrofusionstimulationisanindependentfactorofchromosomeabnormalityinmiceoocytesreconstructedviaspindletransfer
AT yimingguo electrofusionstimulationisanindependentfactorofchromosomeabnormalityinmiceoocytesreconstructedviaspindletransfer
AT shujiehan electrofusionstimulationisanindependentfactorofchromosomeabnormalityinmiceoocytesreconstructedviaspindletransfer
AT shujiehan electrofusionstimulationisanindependentfactorofchromosomeabnormalityinmiceoocytesreconstructedviaspindletransfer
AT shujiehan electrofusionstimulationisanindependentfactorofchromosomeabnormalityinmiceoocytesreconstructedviaspindletransfer
AT mingmingshu electrofusionstimulationisanindependentfactorofchromosomeabnormalityinmiceoocytesreconstructedviaspindletransfer
AT mingmingshu electrofusionstimulationisanindependentfactorofchromosomeabnormalityinmiceoocytesreconstructedviaspindletransfer
AT qihangwang electrofusionstimulationisanindependentfactorofchromosomeabnormalityinmiceoocytesreconstructedviaspindletransfer
AT leizhang electrofusionstimulationisanindependentfactorofchromosomeabnormalityinmiceoocytesreconstructedviaspindletransfer
AT weishang electrofusionstimulationisanindependentfactorofchromosomeabnormalityinmiceoocytesreconstructedviaspindletransfer
AT weishang electrofusionstimulationisanindependentfactorofchromosomeabnormalityinmiceoocytesreconstructedviaspindletransfer
AT weishang electrofusionstimulationisanindependentfactorofchromosomeabnormalityinmiceoocytesreconstructedviaspindletransfer
_version_ 1721223172119855104
spelling doaj-e46974a294e14083a6e5c47e7780d4902021-08-03T14:21:32ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Endocrinology1664-23922021-07-011210.3389/fendo.2021.705837705837Electrofusion Stimulation Is an Independent Factor of Chromosome Abnormality in Mice Oocytes Reconstructed via Spindle TransferWei Wang0Wei Wang1Wei Wang2Wei Wang3Suxia Shao4Wei Chen5Weizhou Wang6Weizhou Wang7Yunhai Chuai8Yunhai Chuai9Yunfei Li10Yunfei Li11Yunfei Li12Yiming Guo13Shujie Han14Shujie Han15Shujie Han16Mingming Shu17Mingming Shu18Qihang Wang19Lei Zhang20Wei Shang21Wei Shang22Wei Shang23Department of Histology and Embryology, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Sixth Medical Center of Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Harrison International Peace Hospital, Hengshui, ChinaDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, ChinaDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Sixth Medical Center of Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Sixth Medical Center of Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Sixth Medical Center of Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Biology, Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Art & Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United StatesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Sixth Medical Center of Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, ChinaNavy Clinical Medical School, Anhui Medical University, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Sixth Medical Center of Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, First Hospital of Tsinghua University, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Sixth Medical Center of Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, ChinaNavy Clinical Medical School, Anhui Medical University, Beijing, ChinaOocytes reconstructed by spindle transfer (ST) are prone to chromosome abnormality, which is speculated to be caused by mechanical interference or premature activation, the mechanism is controversial. In this study, C57BL/6N oocytes were used as the model, and electrofusion ST was performed under normal conditions, Ca2+ free, and at room temperature, respectively. The effect of enucleation and electrofusion stimulation on MPF activity, spindle morphology, γ-tubulin localization and chromosome arrangement was compared. We found that electrofusion stimulation could induce premature chromosome separation and abnormal spindle morphology and assembly by decreasing the MPF activity, leading to premature activation, and thus resulting in chromosome abnormality in oocytes reconstructed via ST. Electrofusion stimulation was an independent factor of chromosome abnormality in oocytes reconstructed via ST, and was not related to enucleation, fusion status, temperature, or Ca2+. The electrofusion stimulation number should be minimized, with no more than 2 times being appropriate. As the electrofusion stimulation number increased, several typical abnormalities in chromosome arrangement and spindle assembly occurred. Although blastocyst culture could eliminate embryos with chromosomal abnormalities, it would significantly decrease the number of normal embryos and reduce the availability of embryos. The optimum operating condition for electrofusion ST was the 37°C group without Ca2+.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2021.705837/fullspindle transferelectrofusionelectrofusion stimulationpremature activationchromosome abnormality