Mutagenicity testing with transgenic mice. Part II: Comparison with the mouse spot test

<p>Abstract</p> <p>The mouse spot test, an <it>in vivo </it>mutation assay, has been used to assess a number of chemicals. It is at present the only <it>in vivo </it>mammalian test system capable of detecting somatic gene mutations according to OECD guidelin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wahnschaffe Ulrich, Bitsch Annette, Kielhorn Janet, Mangelsdorf Inge
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2005-01-01
Series:Journal of Carcinogenesis
Online Access:http://www.carcinogenesis.com/content/4/1/4
id doaj-e3f19ba156094eefbe7b4467bf483df3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e3f19ba156094eefbe7b4467bf483df32020-11-24T22:49:40ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Carcinogenesis0974-67731477-31632005-01-0141410.1186/1477-3163-4-4Mutagenicity testing with transgenic mice. Part II: Comparison with the mouse spot testWahnschaffe UlrichBitsch AnnetteKielhorn JanetMangelsdorf Inge<p>Abstract</p> <p>The mouse spot test, an <it>in vivo </it>mutation assay, has been used to assess a number of chemicals. It is at present the only <it>in vivo </it>mammalian test system capable of detecting somatic gene mutations according to OECD guidelines (OECD guideline 484). It is however rather insensitive, animal consuming and expensive type of test. More recently several assays using transgenic animals have been developed. From data in the literature, the present study compares the results of <it>in vivo </it>testing of over twenty chemicals using the mouse spot test and compares them with results from the two transgenic mouse models with the best data base available, the <it>lacI </it>model (commercially available as the Big Blue<sup>® </sup>mouse), and the <it>lacZ </it>model (commercially available as the Muta™ Mouse). There was agreement in the results from the majority of substances. No differences were found in the predictability of the transgenic animal assays and the mouse spot test for carcinogenicity. However, from the limited data available, it seems that the transgenic mouse assay has several advantages over the mouse spot test and may be a suitable test system replacing the mouse spot test for detection of gene but not chromosome mutations <it>in vivo</it>.</p> http://www.carcinogenesis.com/content/4/1/4
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wahnschaffe Ulrich
Bitsch Annette
Kielhorn Janet
Mangelsdorf Inge
spellingShingle Wahnschaffe Ulrich
Bitsch Annette
Kielhorn Janet
Mangelsdorf Inge
Mutagenicity testing with transgenic mice. Part II: Comparison with the mouse spot test
Journal of Carcinogenesis
author_facet Wahnschaffe Ulrich
Bitsch Annette
Kielhorn Janet
Mangelsdorf Inge
author_sort Wahnschaffe Ulrich
title Mutagenicity testing with transgenic mice. Part II: Comparison with the mouse spot test
title_short Mutagenicity testing with transgenic mice. Part II: Comparison with the mouse spot test
title_full Mutagenicity testing with transgenic mice. Part II: Comparison with the mouse spot test
title_fullStr Mutagenicity testing with transgenic mice. Part II: Comparison with the mouse spot test
title_full_unstemmed Mutagenicity testing with transgenic mice. Part II: Comparison with the mouse spot test
title_sort mutagenicity testing with transgenic mice. part ii: comparison with the mouse spot test
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Carcinogenesis
issn 0974-6773
1477-3163
publishDate 2005-01-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>The mouse spot test, an <it>in vivo </it>mutation assay, has been used to assess a number of chemicals. It is at present the only <it>in vivo </it>mammalian test system capable of detecting somatic gene mutations according to OECD guidelines (OECD guideline 484). It is however rather insensitive, animal consuming and expensive type of test. More recently several assays using transgenic animals have been developed. From data in the literature, the present study compares the results of <it>in vivo </it>testing of over twenty chemicals using the mouse spot test and compares them with results from the two transgenic mouse models with the best data base available, the <it>lacI </it>model (commercially available as the Big Blue<sup>® </sup>mouse), and the <it>lacZ </it>model (commercially available as the Muta™ Mouse). There was agreement in the results from the majority of substances. No differences were found in the predictability of the transgenic animal assays and the mouse spot test for carcinogenicity. However, from the limited data available, it seems that the transgenic mouse assay has several advantages over the mouse spot test and may be a suitable test system replacing the mouse spot test for detection of gene but not chromosome mutations <it>in vivo</it>.</p>
url http://www.carcinogenesis.com/content/4/1/4
work_keys_str_mv AT wahnschaffeulrich mutagenicitytestingwithtransgenicmicepartiicomparisonwiththemousespottest
AT bitschannette mutagenicitytestingwithtransgenicmicepartiicomparisonwiththemousespottest
AT kielhornjanet mutagenicitytestingwithtransgenicmicepartiicomparisonwiththemousespottest
AT mangelsdorfinge mutagenicitytestingwithtransgenicmicepartiicomparisonwiththemousespottest
_version_ 1725675374943141888