Composition of the editorial boards of leading medical education journals

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Researchers from the developing world contribute only a limited proportion to the total research output published in leading medical education journals. Some of them believe that there is a substantial editorial bias against their wo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tutarel Oktay
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2004-01-01
Series:BMC Medical Research Methodology
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/4/3
id doaj-e12e4edfd54a4d04845185ab704ae0e9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e12e4edfd54a4d04845185ab704ae0e92020-11-24T22:09:21ZengBMCBMC Medical Research Methodology1471-22882004-01-0141310.1186/1471-2288-4-3Composition of the editorial boards of leading medical education journalsTutarel Oktay<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Researchers from the developing world contribute only a limited proportion to the total research output published in leading medical education journals. Some of them believe that there is a substantial editorial bias against their work. To obtain an objective basis for further discussion the present study was designed to assess the composition of the editorial boards of leading medical education journals.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The editorial boards of the three leading medical education journals according to their impact factor were retrieved from the respective January issue of the year 2003. We evaluated in which countries the editorial board members were based and classified these countries using the World Bank income criteria.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Individuals from a number of countries can be found on the editorial boards of the investigated journals, but most of them are based in high-income countries.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The percentage of editorial board members which are based in developing world countries is higher for the leading medical education journals than in most of their psychiatry and general medicine counterparts. But it is still too low.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/4/3
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tutarel Oktay
spellingShingle Tutarel Oktay
Composition of the editorial boards of leading medical education journals
BMC Medical Research Methodology
author_facet Tutarel Oktay
author_sort Tutarel Oktay
title Composition of the editorial boards of leading medical education journals
title_short Composition of the editorial boards of leading medical education journals
title_full Composition of the editorial boards of leading medical education journals
title_fullStr Composition of the editorial boards of leading medical education journals
title_full_unstemmed Composition of the editorial boards of leading medical education journals
title_sort composition of the editorial boards of leading medical education journals
publisher BMC
series BMC Medical Research Methodology
issn 1471-2288
publishDate 2004-01-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Researchers from the developing world contribute only a limited proportion to the total research output published in leading medical education journals. Some of them believe that there is a substantial editorial bias against their work. To obtain an objective basis for further discussion the present study was designed to assess the composition of the editorial boards of leading medical education journals.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The editorial boards of the three leading medical education journals according to their impact factor were retrieved from the respective January issue of the year 2003. We evaluated in which countries the editorial board members were based and classified these countries using the World Bank income criteria.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Individuals from a number of countries can be found on the editorial boards of the investigated journals, but most of them are based in high-income countries.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The percentage of editorial board members which are based in developing world countries is higher for the leading medical education journals than in most of their psychiatry and general medicine counterparts. But it is still too low.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/4/3
work_keys_str_mv AT tutareloktay compositionoftheeditorialboardsofleadingmedicaleducationjournals
_version_ 1725812363157831680