Unintended Consequences of Interview Faking: Impact on Perceived Fit and Affective Outcomes

Drawing on signalling theory, we propose that use of deceptive impression management (IM) in the employment interview could produce false signals, and individuals hired based on such signals may incur consequences once they are on the job—such as poor perceived fit. We surveyed job applican...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Charbonneau, Brooke, Powell, Deborah, Spence, Jeffrey, Lyons, Sean
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: International Personnel Assessment Council (IPAC) 2021-05-01
Series:Personnel Assessment and Decisions
Online Access:https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/pad/vol7/iss1/6/
id doaj-e0fbcbb0b1aa4644b87452bcc336ee9e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e0fbcbb0b1aa4644b87452bcc336ee9e2021-05-21T17:56:22Zeng International Personnel Assessment Council (IPAC)Personnel Assessment and Decisions2377-88222021-05-017110.25035/pad.2021.01.006Unintended Consequences of Interview Faking: Impact on Perceived Fit and Affective OutcomesCharbonneau, BrookePowell, DeborahSpence, JeffreyLyons, Sean Drawing on signalling theory, we propose that use of deceptive impression management (IM) in the employment interview could produce false signals, and individuals hired based on such signals may incur consequences once they are on the job—such as poor perceived fit. We surveyed job applicants who recently interviewed and received a job to investigate the relationship between use of deceptive IM in the interview and subsequent perceived personjob and person-organization fit, stress, well-being, and employee engagement. In a twophase study, 206 job applicants self-reported their use of deceptive IM in their interviews at Time 1, and their perceived person–job and person–organization fit, job stress, affective well-being, and employee engagement at Time 2. Deceptive IM had a negative relationship with perceived person–job and person–organization fit. As well, perceived fit accounted for the relationship between deceptive IM and well-being, employee engagement, and job stress. The findings indicate that using deceptive IM in the interview may come at a cost to employees.https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/pad/vol7/iss1/6/
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Charbonneau, Brooke
Powell, Deborah
Spence, Jeffrey
Lyons, Sean
spellingShingle Charbonneau, Brooke
Powell, Deborah
Spence, Jeffrey
Lyons, Sean
Unintended Consequences of Interview Faking: Impact on Perceived Fit and Affective Outcomes
Personnel Assessment and Decisions
author_facet Charbonneau, Brooke
Powell, Deborah
Spence, Jeffrey
Lyons, Sean
author_sort Charbonneau, Brooke
title Unintended Consequences of Interview Faking: Impact on Perceived Fit and Affective Outcomes
title_short Unintended Consequences of Interview Faking: Impact on Perceived Fit and Affective Outcomes
title_full Unintended Consequences of Interview Faking: Impact on Perceived Fit and Affective Outcomes
title_fullStr Unintended Consequences of Interview Faking: Impact on Perceived Fit and Affective Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Unintended Consequences of Interview Faking: Impact on Perceived Fit and Affective Outcomes
title_sort unintended consequences of interview faking: impact on perceived fit and affective outcomes
publisher International Personnel Assessment Council (IPAC)
series Personnel Assessment and Decisions
issn 2377-8822
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Drawing on signalling theory, we propose that use of deceptive impression management (IM) in the employment interview could produce false signals, and individuals hired based on such signals may incur consequences once they are on the job—such as poor perceived fit. We surveyed job applicants who recently interviewed and received a job to investigate the relationship between use of deceptive IM in the interview and subsequent perceived personjob and person-organization fit, stress, well-being, and employee engagement. In a twophase study, 206 job applicants self-reported their use of deceptive IM in their interviews at Time 1, and their perceived person–job and person–organization fit, job stress, affective well-being, and employee engagement at Time 2. Deceptive IM had a negative relationship with perceived person–job and person–organization fit. As well, perceived fit accounted for the relationship between deceptive IM and well-being, employee engagement, and job stress. The findings indicate that using deceptive IM in the interview may come at a cost to employees.
url https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/pad/vol7/iss1/6/
work_keys_str_mv AT charbonneaubrooke unintendedconsequencesofinterviewfakingimpactonperceivedfitandaffectiveoutcomes
AT powelldeborah unintendedconsequencesofinterviewfakingimpactonperceivedfitandaffectiveoutcomes
AT spencejeffrey unintendedconsequencesofinterviewfakingimpactonperceivedfitandaffectiveoutcomes
AT lyonssean unintendedconsequencesofinterviewfakingimpactonperceivedfitandaffectiveoutcomes
_version_ 1721431041020788736