Evaluation of an Innovative Model for Teaching an LLB Program

In 1993 the Faculty of Law and Criminal Justice at Southern Cross University developed an innovative “block or “intensive teaching” model for the delivery of the first and second years of its three-year graduate LLB program. This model represented a significant departure from the standard format for...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Helen Saenger, Martin Hayden, Sam Garkawe, Jim Jackson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Bond University
Series:Legal Education Review
Online Access:http://ler.scholasticahq.com/article/6064-evaluation-of-an-innovative-model-for-teaching-an-llb-program.pdf
id doaj-e037fe71ea2c45a7a3c929a3c7d30492
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e037fe71ea2c45a7a3c929a3c7d304922020-11-25T01:25:02ZengBond UniversityLegal Education Review1033-2839Evaluation of an Innovative Model for Teaching an LLB ProgramHelen SaengerMartin HaydenSam GarkaweJim JacksonIn 1993 the Faculty of Law and Criminal Justice at Southern Cross University developed an innovative “block or “intensive teaching” model for the delivery of the first and second years of its three-year graduate LLB program. This model represented a significant departure from the standard format for the teaching of LLB programs in Australia. In this article, we report an evaluation of the effectiveness of the model. The results of the evaluation shed light on its potential strengths and weaknesses and provide insights into what some Australian law students value in teaching and program design. Although the block model was largely discontinued in 1996 for pragmatic reasons, it was generally found to have been a successful innovation. The findings from the evaluation should, therefore, be of considerable interest to other law schools, particularly those actively exploring options to increase their flexibility in program delivery. There is an emerging trend for law schools to offer Masters courses over short intensive teaching periods, and to offer LLB units (mainly later-year ones) during summer semesters within time frames that are more intensive than in the normal semester. Staff administering these courses should find the evaluation results especially relevant, particularly as the students undertaking the block program at Southern Cross University were all graduate students whose reactions to an intensive teaching program are more likely to be comparable with those of LLM and later-year LLB students.http://ler.scholasticahq.com/article/6064-evaluation-of-an-innovative-model-for-teaching-an-llb-program.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Helen Saenger
Martin Hayden
Sam Garkawe
Jim Jackson
spellingShingle Helen Saenger
Martin Hayden
Sam Garkawe
Jim Jackson
Evaluation of an Innovative Model for Teaching an LLB Program
Legal Education Review
author_facet Helen Saenger
Martin Hayden
Sam Garkawe
Jim Jackson
author_sort Helen Saenger
title Evaluation of an Innovative Model for Teaching an LLB Program
title_short Evaluation of an Innovative Model for Teaching an LLB Program
title_full Evaluation of an Innovative Model for Teaching an LLB Program
title_fullStr Evaluation of an Innovative Model for Teaching an LLB Program
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of an Innovative Model for Teaching an LLB Program
title_sort evaluation of an innovative model for teaching an llb program
publisher Bond University
series Legal Education Review
issn 1033-2839
description In 1993 the Faculty of Law and Criminal Justice at Southern Cross University developed an innovative “block or “intensive teaching” model for the delivery of the first and second years of its three-year graduate LLB program. This model represented a significant departure from the standard format for the teaching of LLB programs in Australia. In this article, we report an evaluation of the effectiveness of the model. The results of the evaluation shed light on its potential strengths and weaknesses and provide insights into what some Australian law students value in teaching and program design. Although the block model was largely discontinued in 1996 for pragmatic reasons, it was generally found to have been a successful innovation. The findings from the evaluation should, therefore, be of considerable interest to other law schools, particularly those actively exploring options to increase their flexibility in program delivery. There is an emerging trend for law schools to offer Masters courses over short intensive teaching periods, and to offer LLB units (mainly later-year ones) during summer semesters within time frames that are more intensive than in the normal semester. Staff administering these courses should find the evaluation results especially relevant, particularly as the students undertaking the block program at Southern Cross University were all graduate students whose reactions to an intensive teaching program are more likely to be comparable with those of LLM and later-year LLB students.
url http://ler.scholasticahq.com/article/6064-evaluation-of-an-innovative-model-for-teaching-an-llb-program.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT helensaenger evaluationofaninnovativemodelforteachinganllbprogram
AT martinhayden evaluationofaninnovativemodelforteachinganllbprogram
AT samgarkawe evaluationofaninnovativemodelforteachinganllbprogram
AT jimjackson evaluationofaninnovativemodelforteachinganllbprogram
_version_ 1725115619649519616